LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

383 clearence issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 05:40 PM
  #1  
ThirdGenLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 47
From: Minnesota
383 clearence issues

I was talking to a guy at work who is building a 383 stroker, non LT1, tradtional GM block. He was explaining how he had to have his block notched for clearence issues. I am wondering if this is an issue when building a 383 LT1.

He was also talkig about having the crank cross drilled to help oiling, something about it will get oil on both sides of the crank as opposed to one... anyone framilier with this? Said it was something to consider when building a high reving engine.

Thanks, Matt
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 05:52 PM
  #2  
Josh-'04 GTO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,697
From: Petersham, MA
Re: 383 clearence issues

Originally posted by ThirdGenLT1
I was talking to a guy at work who is building a 383 stroker, non LT1, tradtional GM block. He was explaining how he had to have his block notched for clearence issues. I am wondering if this is an issue when building a 383 LT1.
Yep, it usually is. I needed to clearance the pan rail with a die grinder, and my oil pan needed "massaging" with a ball pean hammer.
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 06:06 PM
  #3  
AndyB's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 258
From: Usa
Yup you need about .060 clearance on the pan rails and bottom the the cylinders. You also might have to clearance the rods for cam clearance.
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 06:20 PM
  #4  
ThirdGenLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 47
From: Minnesota
This is probably a stupid question, but what does "clearence the rods" exactly mean? Would the shop that will be balancing my parts take care of this?

If it helps, My engine will be N/A with stock casting ported heads:

SRP pistons, P/N 138103, -16 cc dome volume
Scat 9000 crank, 3.750 stroke
eagle H-beam 6" rods, unless I beam will be strong enough.

Thanks again, Matt.
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 11:44 PM
  #5  
S.J.S.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,201
From: HI.
Just did mine with Eagle H-beams and they definately had a clearance issue. The machine shop will have to clearance the block. If you can picture this.....the rods are longer and the stroke is bigger so when the rods rotate aroung the crank it will hit the lower walls of the cylinders. When they talk about clearancing there just making sure nothing is hitting. You'll need to do this. The Eagle rods will definately hit the oil pan and windage tray. I ended up going with the Canton pan with built in windage tray. It fits like a glove.
Old Nov 5, 2003 | 01:41 AM
  #6  
Dave88LX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,168
From: AACO, MD
Same pistons and crank I'm got! Why are you going with Eagle rods though? Scat has an LT1 package...

383IPS or something. Email a guy named Brian Adams: scatstroker@hotmail.com about seeing what kind of deal he can work out for you...might be worth your while. If you're going N/A, 4340 Forged I-beams will be fine.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
Drtryder
LT1 Based Engine Tech
10
Apr 22, 2015 04:17 PM
cheapchevy
LT1 Based Engine Tech
11
Apr 8, 2015 08:48 PM
Chevyguy358
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
Jan 28, 2015 08:04 PM
Jesse_Boyer
LS1 Based Engine Tech
0
Jul 9, 2002 04:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM.