LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

355 n/a rwhp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 02:45 PM
  #16  
atljar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,068
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Ya thats why i asked about the ECM. YOu hit 7k with obd1, and it shuts the car off totally. Ive been there, done that too. You cant program around it.

Fuel system.... My buddies ran out of line at 580 rwhp with big intank and inline booster. Just telling it how i have seen it
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 03:17 PM
  #17  
BadBirdLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 30
From: Indiana
If you have a 96-97 ecm then you could rev to 7500. I just learned that today.
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 03:23 PM
  #18  
atljar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,068
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
OK so...

You are running a $5k 355. (from another posts) Billet rods, mag crank, forged pistons blah blah.

Running $3k heads, (AFR 220) with 2.02/1.60 valves. Funny because those come with 2.08/1.60 STANDARD.

Running a 150 shot of n20, which gave you EXACTLY 150 rwhp.

Spinning the stock 94 ecm to 7500rpms, when thats impossible.

You dont have enough fuel (lines or pump) to support those N20 numbers.

Those Tq numbers are beyond bogus.

That solid roller cam with only low 600 lift? You could have used those profiles on a hydro cam easily.

In other posts
i use a set up like you want.355 callies billet crank,oliver billet rods
je pistons 11.5.1,i use nitrous have put a 250 shot on it no problems.
At that time your set up was 11.5:1 and you sprayed a 250 on it. Now its 12:1 and only a 150.

Other posts i have seen (dont make me quote them too) have had your engine at 465 fly wheel, 465 rwhp, and then this post.

Also you have run, spec, mcCloud, McCloud street twin, lt4 clutches all within 4 months.

You are 6'4, 300 lbs, and bench 300lbs.

Get outta here troll.

Last edited by atljar; Feb 10, 2004 at 03:50 PM.
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 03:25 PM
  #19  
BadBirdLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 30
From: Indiana
Yeah I noticed he had a 94 but a OBD1 to OBD2 conversion is not hard.

Troll this
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 03:28 PM
  #20  
ssbowtie1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 631
From: LA/SD, CA
That's nothing dude I'm running a 283 Lt1 with an ls1 intake and a sbc dist with 4.3 liter heads and 15.1 compression making 732 hp.


You're so stupid you have a 40k vette and a camaro with easy 20k invested in it, yet you can't furnish an 80 dollar digi cam or 30 dollar scanner to show us proof? I can't wait until your parents cut off your internet once they realize how much of a dumbass you are.
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 03:35 PM
  #21  
atljar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,068
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally posted by BadBirdLT1
Yeah I noticed he had a 94 but a OBD1 to OBD2 conversion is not hard.

Troll this
Oh dont get me started on your 383 In all honesty, i think that thing is going to SCREAM once it gets healthy.
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #22  
JZ 97 SS 1500's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 762
From: Huntsville, Alabama
He made good power.....you have to give credit where credit is due. That LT4 Hotcam and Airfoil are a monster
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 03:46 PM
  #23  
BadBirdLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 30
From: Indiana
Yeah Jared I have had some abd luck lately getting this thing running right. The new opti should hopefully be on tommorow night and Dave thinks it should freakin rip. I cant wait I have never driven this thing when it is 100% it has always been something, gears, opti, header gaskets, etc...
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 10:34 PM
  #24  
brain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 746
From: Columbia, SC, USA
Curious, those cam specs seemed big to me. My friend just got his cam specs for his Windsor (436 CID), and they are very close -

259/268 duration .640/.650 lift

Its a solid roller, and he asked the builder for some serious power with a peak of around 6500. Seems reasonable to me that 100 less cubic inches would peak about 1000 rpms higher. Is there a reason at all to go solid on a cam like that tho? I would figure for a cam like that spring pressure would certainly be more than a hydro lifter would like, at least a Chevrolet lifter. Springs are almost 250 seat pressure.

I'm not gonna call BS on it, simply cause I really HOPE that the numbers are real, and with the listed parts, I would presume it to be possible.
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 02:20 AM
  #25  
zjet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 221
You guys i did post a error (at the time i didnt have my sheet),it started to peak when it shut off,it did shut off at 7000,i thought it had just hit the rev limit.found out today on here and after i spoke to a guy at work the stock pcm will only let it go 7000.YES, i did make a mistake.....

Last edited by JEREMYHERMAN; Feb 18, 2004 at 12:07 AM.
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 12:17 AM
  #26  
zjet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 221
After researching my stock rev limiter problem,I found out that lt-1 edit will remove the factory limiters,So this weekend I am have it redone.When it was dyno'ed i kept moving the rev limiter is my msd up it kept hitting so i thought...Honestly never read the sheet i looked at the hp..

I am thinking about taking the car with me to my sister's in houston next month and have mti or somebody dyno it,down there.Anybody like or dislike mti...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
Mar 13, 2016 03:37 PM
95chwagon
Parts For Sale
5
Oct 16, 2015 12:24 PM
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Sep 19, 2015 11:19 PM
DelSoto
Forced Induction
4
Sep 19, 2015 05:31 AM
94ZinEdgewater
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
Sep 8, 2015 09:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 PM.