LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

355 LE Dyno tune this Friday...Guess my numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 07:10 PM
  #256  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Originally Posted by 1redTA
damn speed demon If I knew your cam was going to be such a problem.... Any way it pulls to 6800 on my car.... NO tune, stock 24lb fuel system. The plugs look a little lean, but the car pulls hard. The motor has approx 400 miles as of yet I will keep a close look out on the behavior fo the motor now. Art
Welcome to the party, what valve springs and ratio rockers do you have Red?
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 08:35 PM
  #257  
dangalla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,092
From: lakeville, pa
Originally Posted by 1redTA
damn speed demon If I knew your cam was going to be such a problem.... Any way it pulls to 6800 on my car.... NO tune, stock 24lb fuel system. The plugs look a little lean, but the car pulls hard. The motor has approx 400 miles as of yet I will keep a close look out on the behavior fo the motor now. Art
setting things up correctly and proper geometry are key, you will be fine as will the rest of the people running this set up
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 09:06 PM
  #258  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
Originally Posted by wrd1972
The golds are a good bit stronger than the beehives. I want to avoid overdoing things any more than at all possible even if it costs another set. Things are overdone enough right now.

Again I can see the float in the Datamaster logs and I can check #1 cylinder's spring pressures and have the car back together in 20 minutes. If I have to check the 3-4 times a year so be it to ensure things hold up.

If the my beehives were simply just slightly under par for my combonation of components then the golds should provide the valve control I need. Thats the plan right now. The Comp 921 KIT I got for free, I might make $600.00. These spring swaps are costing me nothing but my time.
If you are going to a double spring you need to setup up the pressure. If you are going to go with the golds I would go with the new 918's instead since they have an increased spring rate over the old 918's/pac springs. They are also nitraded unlike the 1218's.
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #259  
marshall93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,639
From: Mooresville, NC
I doubt he'll run 918s anytime soon!
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 10:22 PM
  #260  
marshall93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,639
From: Mooresville, NC
Originally Posted by wrd1972
Well we have tapped every angle to every valve related topic in this thread but this one, so here goes.

I cant see the weight of the spring being as much a concern as a moving object like the lifter, push rod, rocker and valve. The spring does not really reciprocate in the same manner as those components. I would even tend to think that springs factor little into the equation in terms of weight. The acceleration and decel forces seem to be to me much different. The whole inertia law seems different.

Maybe I am wrong.



The weight on the cam side of rocker is nowhere near as important as the valve side, so don't be worried too much with lifter or pushrod weights.

With the beehives, you have a smaller retainer than regular springs PLUS the top coils are smaller then typical springs and that is the part of the spring that is constantly moving, therefore equaling less weight moving.

Last edited by marshall93z; Apr 3, 2008 at 10:25 PM.
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 06:27 AM
  #261  
1redTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 144
From: mobile al
re

wrd1972 I am running nsa pro mag 1.6 with springs that were on the heads when I got them, uuuhhh so I don't know. Traded a motor that went 10.40 for these heads and cash. I just wanted to put something on that should be real fun. If the springs wear out I guess this will be real fun.Art
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 08:25 AM
  #262  
Yeahdoug's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 51
From: Detroit
Did you swap springs? Any results?
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 08:42 AM
  #263  
black96z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 193
From: Prestonsburg, Ky
He has changed his springs should know very soon the results and I am changing my springs too so we should know on mine by the first of next week if its fixed too.......
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 08:45 AM
  #264  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
http://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=901593
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #265  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Update:
I installed the PSI LS1511ML beehives at 1.765" install height. Pressures are 130#/360#.

Went out and hammered on it and logged everything on datamaster.
NO IMPROVEMENT PERIOD.

The AFGS is still falling off at 6K RPM and the motor sounds very rough. Drop under 6K then everything is golden.

Lloyd and Brett state that the PAC 1218's are sufficient with this cam setup at 1.750". The PSI's are stronger especially open so it appears that even more pressure is needed.

Next options to consider short of replacing the cam are dropping to 1.5 ratio rockers to get the lift down to the .560's, installing a rev kit, pray for a miracle. This makes no damn sense. Again Brett and lloyd claim this works and there are guys on this board running the same cam with no issues.

Last edited by wrd1972; Apr 27, 2008 at 07:09 AM.
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #266  
black96z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 193
From: Prestonsburg, Ky
Now this has me worried that my springs I bought is not going to work either......
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #267  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Like I said on the other forum the springs you used are stronger over the nose but weaker on the seat and it is possible to bounce the valve off the seat so there is still possibility it is float.

If you have access to a set of 1.5s that would be probably the easiest way to check it.
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #268  
marshall93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,639
From: Mooresville, NC
What I said on ls1tech...

Wow, less on the seat! With aggressive ramps, less seat pressure will make valve bounce more of a possibility! When that valve closes, you want it to STAY closed.
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #269  
ulakovic22's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,872
From: Lantana, TX
Just saw that you had 146 on the seat with the other springs and you dropped down to 130? Definitely shim them up and check your clearances to get that back up.
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 11:57 AM
  #270  
Stl94LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,083
From: O'Fallon, MO
Here's something to look into. I thought I had a valve float problem. Tried reshimming the valve springs amongst a few other things. Nothing worked. Finally one day I thought I had bent a valve. I put air in the cylinder that I thought was affected, and you could hear air coming back through the intake. Pulled the head knowing I had a bent valve, took it to the local machine shop. No bent valve. The heads had been machined wrong when I had them ported, and the valves weren't sealing properly. The valve seats had been machined off center to the valves. CNC Cylinder HEADS was the original head porter.

I wouldn't hurt to do a leakdown test on a few cylinders, to eliminate the possibilty of a case of bad machining.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 AM.