LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

Difference in HP in LS1's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2002 | 03:11 PM
  #1  
RinoSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5
Question Difference in HP in LS1's

I drive a 2000 SVT Contour, but my real love is camaros. I know that the LS1 motor can be very different. I have heard stories of cars rolling off the line with 12+ rwhp more than the car ahead of it or behind it. I looked thorugh the site and didn't find much, so i was wondering if anybody knew why this happens?
Old Dec 2, 2002 | 03:40 PM
  #2  
PhantomTA's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,881
From: Chelsea, MI
Build and casting tolerances... thats the only explaination. Otherwise they make more power the newer the year in stock trim. But ive seen #'s + - 20hp. No real reason
Old Dec 2, 2002 | 03:47 PM
  #3  
RinoSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5
Thanx Dave i appreciate the input.

PS: Anybody wanna trade a 2000 SVT Contour for an LS1 Camaro
Old Dec 2, 2002 | 04:00 PM
  #4  
PhantomTA's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,881
From: Chelsea, MI
camaro? all i have is a firebird.. sorry its not what ya want
Old Dec 2, 2002 | 05:24 PM
  #5  
tomslawsky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 96
From: St. pete, Fl
The differences in the same model year are due to dyno tuning coupled with the fact that the SAE correction factors aren't perfect. Other than that, GM has QC and I'm willing to bet that all LS1s being pumped out in the same year put out within plus, minus 10-HP, which is about 3 percent. that is why Chevy has a QC dept, to make sure there is a low amount of varrience in the motor. for what it is worth, the Vette MOTOR and the F-body MOTOr for 2001 and 2002 are identical
Old Dec 2, 2002 | 07:30 PM
  #6  
redz_02's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 390
From: Corpus Christi, Texas, US
I think it mainly has to do with how the owner drives. I drive my car like a rape ape and i pulled the numbers in my sig, My freind dynoed his 02 z with dynamouth exhaust and he only pulled 305 rwhp, and they are both m6's
Old Dec 2, 2002 | 07:32 PM
  #7  
redz_02's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 390
From: Corpus Christi, Texas, US
he dynoed right after mine, and he drives his car pretty easy.
Old Dec 2, 2002 | 08:19 PM
  #8  
RinoSVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5
Originally posted by redz_02
I think it mainly has to do with how the owner drives. I drive my car like a rape ape and i pulled the numbers in my sig, My freind dynoed his 02 z with dynamouth exhaust and he only pulled 305 rwhp, and they are both m6's
I wasn't aware that how hard you drive your car had anything to do with the power you put out on the dyno. Please correct me if I am wrong
Old Dec 3, 2002 | 06:56 AM
  #9  
96fbirdA4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 221
From: Marysville, OH
Originally posted by RinoSVT
I wasn't aware that how hard you drive your car had anything to do with the power you put out on the dyno. Please correct me if I am wrong
You're not wrong. There are many things that can affect power output of a car, even similar year cars. How hard you drive it is not one of them.

If the guy with the 02 was getting knock retard that is just one simple explanation for the power difference.
Old Dec 3, 2002 | 04:42 PM
  #10  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Arrow

Originally posted by tomslawsky
The differences in the same model year are due to dyno tuning coupled with the fact that the SAE correction factors aren't perfect. Other than that, GM has QC and I'm willing to bet that all LS1s being pumped out in the same year put out within plus, minus 10-HP, which is about 3 percent. that is why Chevy has a QC dept, to make sure there is a low amount of varrience in the motor. for what it is worth, the Vette MOTOR and the F-body MOTOr for 2001 and 2002 are identical
I'd like to agree with you on this, but I have to go with PhantomTA on this one .....................not all motors are built equal --- regardless of GM's Q.C. department. Unfortunately, not every piece is exactly the same size, shape or weight .................there are differences --- it's a fact of life, and very unrealistic to believe otherwise. Now are these differences huge?? Well, no..............but they're enough to make >10 HP difference between two "identical" cars + motors. Just a slight over-bore, or slight under-bore could mean the difference between a little more friction, or a little more compression, or a little more displacement in the engine, right?? While it may be almost negligable, it's certainly measureable. How about when a crankshaft is made .................what if one particular crank requires a little more "meat" to be removed to balance it than another crank --- this would leave it lighter, which in turn is less rotating mass, right?? .......................so, point being, even small differences can eventually add up to some motors putting out more power than others. THEN, once you add in transmissions with different tolerances, gears/differentials with different tolerances, lighter/heavier driveshafts, axles, tires, rims, etc., you can see where rear-wheel horsepower #'s can be very different.
Old Dec 3, 2002 | 05:10 PM
  #11  
psychocabbage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,901
From: Houston, Tx USA
you also have to bring into consideration, location, dyno model, software used, weather.. lots of stuff..

it is very rare that I see anyone who has done bone stock runs..
I have done two at two different shops on two different days.. I got similar numbers .. but they werent the exact same.. I know for a fact that my car should show btw. a 305-310 on a dyno...

I have pulled 307 and 305 a few thousand miles later.. I dont baby the car but I dont beat on her either.. Heck, the type of gas you use can make a difference as well.. For example, I find that Mobil gas (which is owned by Exxon) feels better in my car than Exxon.. And I use Exxon 9 times out of 10 here.. I only use Exxon Shell or Mobil. Thats it.. Just a preference and a cost thing..

I will dyno with Exxon in it in a couple of weeks.. Will see from there.

But I really think that along with all of this "dynoing" you should also go to the track and have a cross comparison....

I will go to the track as soon as I get tubes installed on these ET Streets.
Old Dec 3, 2002 | 06:48 PM
  #12  
Silver02Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 90
From: San Antonio TX
Hey Redz, dont forget that your friend still had the factory lid, either way, I hear he is a really cool dude.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
Sergio
LT1 Based Engine Tech
11
Jan 27, 2016 04:27 PM
LETZRIDE
Outside of United States
8
Jul 9, 2015 07:17 AM
Aneurysm
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
12
Sep 10, 2002 05:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM.