0-60 in 5.1secs with 2002 SS A4???
#16
Originally posted by mPoRtSsUcK
sorry man, unless your car is seriously modded, there's no way it's making the 0-60 jaunt in 4.1 seconds, aint happenin. stock z's run around 5.3. jchrisos your times are right on.
sorry man, unless your car is seriously modded, there's no way it's making the 0-60 jaunt in 4.1 seconds, aint happenin. stock z's run around 5.3. jchrisos your times are right on.
Jim
#20
Originally posted by DanBUCF
Psychocabbage, what would you say my 0-60 times are with your calculator? 12.57 @111mph 1.86 60' 3800 lbs approximately.
Psychocabbage, what would you say my 0-60 times are with your calculator? 12.57 @111mph 1.86 60' 3800 lbs approximately.
I weigh my car after every run.. each of my timeslips will have the time of day, date, who I raced against, and the weight of the car.
#21
Here's how you calcualate 0-60. Find a cop with a stopwatch, tell him to time you from when you take off till his radar gun reads 60MPH, and then you can do the same thing for 70,80,90,100, 110,120, 130
Seriously, I think the car magazines use a radar gun to calculate 0-60 times.
Seriously, I think the car magazines use a radar gun to calculate 0-60 times.
#22
Originally posted by AronZ28
Here's how you calcualate 0-60. Find a cop with a stopwatch, tell him to time you from when you take off till his radar gun reads 60MPH, and then you can do the same thing for 70,80,90,100, 110,120, 130
Seriously, I think the car magazines use a radar gun to calculate 0-60 times.
Here's how you calcualate 0-60. Find a cop with a stopwatch, tell him to time you from when you take off till his radar gun reads 60MPH, and then you can do the same thing for 70,80,90,100, 110,120, 130
Seriously, I think the car magazines use a radar gun to calculate 0-60 times.
It attaches to the rear of the car and will calculate this info.
They have recently started using more expensive accelerometers to record more data but what many people dont often account for is weather, elevation, driver and state of the car.. New cars rarely have the same performance once they are broken in.. LS1's in particular must be broken in to truely see their full potential.. way too often the car is modded before it is even broken in..
#24
Originally posted by MightyMouse98Z
Using that calculator my old 95Z's 8.48 @ 85 MPH 1/8 time adds up to a 4.23 0-60 time. Not too shabby!
Using that calculator my old 95Z's 8.48 @ 85 MPH 1/8 time adds up to a 4.23 0-60 time. Not too shabby!
My LT1 was great to the 1/8th mile.. then dropped off as LS1s would then start to walk on me..
My LS1 is linear and seamlessly pulls but it sill gets to 60 faster than it does 60-100.. or even 60-85..
#25
Well, considering it only pulled 105.5 in the 1/4 after 85 in the 1/8, I'd say the top end was terrible! Pretty much any other 4.2 0-60 car out there would hand me my *** if it was 0-120!
My current 98 Z M6 only pulls 82.XX in the 1/8 but 106+ in the 1/4.
Gotta love the LS1!
My current 98 Z M6 only pulls 82.XX in the 1/8 but 106+ in the 1/4.
Gotta love the LS1!
#26
Originally posted by psychocabbage
car magazines use whats termed a "5th wheel".
It attaches to the rear of the car and will calculate this info.
They have recently started using more expensive accelerometers to record more data but what many people dont often account for is weather, elevation, driver and state of the car.. New cars rarely have the same performance once they are broken in.. LS1's in particular must be broken in to truely see their full potential.. way too often the car is modded before it is even broken in..
car magazines use whats termed a "5th wheel".
It attaches to the rear of the car and will calculate this info.
They have recently started using more expensive accelerometers to record more data but what many people dont often account for is weather, elevation, driver and state of the car.. New cars rarely have the same performance once they are broken in.. LS1's in particular must be broken in to truely see their full potential.. way too often the car is modded before it is even broken in..
#28
There is no way that a stock fbody can do 0 to 60 that fast. Since you are fond of calculators, have you plugged in your gearing/horse power to one to see what that type projects? I will tell you right now, if anyone but fbody guys read this they would crack up laughing. If this were possible, don't you think there woul be more guys saying they can do this? A car with that type of performance for the price would not have gone out of production!
#29
Originally posted by falchulk
There is no way that a stock fbody can do 0 to 60 that fast. Since you are fond of calculators, have you plugged in your gearing/horse power to one to see what that type projects? I will tell you right now, if anyone but fbody guys read this they would crack up laughing. If this were possible, don't you think there woul be more guys saying they can do this? A car with that type of performance for the price would not have gone out of production!
There is no way that a stock fbody can do 0 to 60 that fast. Since you are fond of calculators, have you plugged in your gearing/horse power to one to see what that type projects? I will tell you right now, if anyone but fbody guys read this they would crack up laughing. If this were possible, don't you think there woul be more guys saying they can do this? A car with that type of performance for the price would not have gone out of production!
so lets get this perfectly straight because somewhere you find it hard to believe..
you are stating that since magazines everywhere state that the stock fbods are only capable of 5 sec 0-60 times then I too must be in there.. so saying that and knowing my track times in the 1/8th mile we are going to feel fully comfortable with an fbod accellerating from 60mph-85.25mph in 3.6 sec with a shift in there..? (thats 8.6 @ 85.25mph) So that means that we can also state that the car somehow gains 7.01 miles per second average after 60...
So what sounds more believeable to you? 4.4 0-60 would leave me 4.2 seconds to get a shift in and accelerate 6.01 miles per second which sounds much more reasonable than 7 or even 8... with a shift mind you!
Now for more stats.. heheh this is too fun.. now keep in mind I am old and bored so I love over explaining this stuff to people..
A 1/4 mile calculator based off weight and hp
Aother based off weight and flywheel hp
this calculates flywheel and rear wheel hp.. pretty accurate if you ask me
Now if you happen to know of a calculator that makes you feel all warm and fuzzy post it up..
Till then know that my car is still bone stock save for the following:
*Oil has been changed like 4 times.. maybe 5.. 38k+ miles now..
*Front disc brake rotors changed yesterday 4/26/04 and new pads as well..
*Air filter replaced with AC Delco replacement air filter at 38K+ miles 04/02/04 for my birthday
*Gas .. added weekly!
*Tires.. changed the stock GSCs after driving 28K miles on them for Yokohama AVS ES100's.. Street tire with similar ratings..
Now do you really think I dont know what I am talking about?
Geesh...
[Jonny5 voice] Need Input! More Input! [/Jonny5 voice]
Last edited by psychocabbage; 04-27-2004 at 03:58 PM.
#30
Originally posted by psychocabbage
not of gone out of production? hmm.. lemme see.. 427 Shelby Cobra comes to mind.. it didnt sell.. it went out of production..
not of gone out of production? hmm.. lemme see.. 427 Shelby Cobra comes to mind.. it didnt sell.. it went out of production..