Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

scanmaster and datamaster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2002 | 06:16 PM
  #1  
lt4 fd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,429
From: plano texas
scanmaster and datamaster

whats the difference?
Old Dec 17, 2002 | 10:54 PM
  #2  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,104
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Scanmaster = "hardware". A LED display "scanner" that you attach to the ALDL connector, allowing you to pull the values of about 20 different sensors and PCM parameters out of the PCM, generally limited to one at a time. Provides real time data on an LED display. Offers limited "record" capability, retaining only max knock retard and minimum O2 volts (and corresponding MPH) for a single WOT pass. Displays trouble (DTC) codes. For the details:

SCANMASTER

DataMaster = "software". You load the software on your laptop, get the correct interface cable, and observe the real time data on the laptop screen.... multiple sensors and parameters simultaneously, and also continuously log the data for an extended period of time. Displays trouble codes. Includes some "diagnostic" capability, e.g. color codes magnitude of long term fuel corrections by cell, calculates injector duty cycle, etc.

For details:

TTS POWER SYSTEMS
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 06:38 PM
  #3  
lt4 fd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,429
From: plano texas
Sounds like datamaster is better if you alredy have the laptop... basically they do the same thing though?
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 08:38 PM
  #4  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,104
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
If I had to choose, I'd say "both". I have a ScanMaster mounted on top of the steering column. Instantaneous data in a bright display that you can read as you make a pass. The laptop stuff is better for saving a file, and analyzing the entire system at a later time. I can record more than 15 minutes of data internal to my MoTeC computer (the one that runs my engine) and replay the entire time from the pits, through the staging lanes, burnout, staging, full pass and shutdown. You can reconstruct the entire run.... knowing what the sensors were reading at each point.
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 08:51 PM
  #5  
94 NO TOP Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 393
From: NASHVILLE, TN
I've got both also. Datamaster is great for logging runs, etc.... looking step by step through your run. The Scanmaster is good for day to day stuff when you don't want to drag the laptop around.
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 03:07 AM
  #6  
lt4 fd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,429
From: plano texas
Well I am on a budget and I certainly dont mind dragging the laptop around so thanks for the advice.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
marlar98
LT1 Based Engine Tech
15
Sep 12, 2018 07:18 AM
marlar98
LT1 Based Engine Tech
13
Sep 19, 2015 07:53 AM
Bails098
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Aug 17, 2015 05:15 PM
jdelaprida
Forced Induction
8
Jul 4, 2015 03:02 AM
jdelaprida
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
1
Jun 27, 2015 08:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 PM.