Terrible gas milage outa my 67
Terrible gas milage outa my 67
im only gettin 8-12 mpg city. its terrible and i dont know why. my engine is nothin really spectacular.
heres what i got
1967 camaro ss. 350, th - 350 tranny. 2.02 heads, bored .030, holley 600 cfm carb, weiand intake(dual plane). uhhh 3.08 gears, no posi, no conveter.
i figured i should be aorund 15 mpg. im puttin in 3.73's and a eaton posi this friday. and then if im not getting any wheelspin at the track im puttin in a 10" 2800 conveter. i know itll kill my mpg a lil more. but im aimin for low 13's.
what can i do to get better gas milage. oh yeah i got a #70 jet in my carb. i know its a bit big. but i ran 2 tenths faster with a 70 than a 65. and it runs a lil better.
heres what i got
1967 camaro ss. 350, th - 350 tranny. 2.02 heads, bored .030, holley 600 cfm carb, weiand intake(dual plane). uhhh 3.08 gears, no posi, no conveter.
i figured i should be aorund 15 mpg. im puttin in 3.73's and a eaton posi this friday. and then if im not getting any wheelspin at the track im puttin in a 10" 2800 conveter. i know itll kill my mpg a lil more. but im aimin for low 13's.
what can i do to get better gas milage. oh yeah i got a #70 jet in my carb. i know its a bit big. but i ran 2 tenths faster with a 70 than a 65. and it runs a lil better.
Well, the fact that your mileage sucks, and you were having cooling issues before, leads me to ask:
What are your initial and total timing numbers?
What octane gas are you running?
The gears should help out, but I wouldn't expect anything better than around 15 around town with a carb, depending on your driving habits.
What are your initial and total timing numbers?
What octane gas are you running?
The gears should help out, but I wouldn't expect anything better than around 15 around town with a carb, depending on your driving habits.
I hate Holleys... plain and simple. I've never heard of any problems with performance on well built small block and a 750-cfm Q-jet. The best part is just like the Ronco Cooker... "you set it, and forget it!"
Try that with a Holley.
Try that with a Holley.
Originally posted by shocker45
how much would the q-jet hurt my performance tho?
how much would the q-jet hurt my performance tho?
Jet builds some pretty nice Quadrajets. You can get them through summit or jegs. I wish I had spent the money to have gotten one when I was buying instead of the Edeltrash carb I'm running now, but I was hoping to have sold the car by now too.
Ok, I want to hear more... I was about to buy an Edlebrock Q-jet. Are they that bad?
Up until now, I've always just bought OEM rebuilt replacements for my street cars. If I needed anything trick, I'd just have them rebuilt professionally.
As for performance, a lot of people prefer Q-jets over Holleys because they're more reliable and are more consistant. Isn't that what you want for racing?
Up until now, I've always just bought OEM rebuilt replacements for my street cars. If I needed anything trick, I'd just have them rebuilt professionally.
As for performance, a lot of people prefer Q-jets over Holleys because they're more reliable and are more consistant. Isn't that what you want for racing?
Originally posted by jg95z28
As for performance, a lot of people prefer Q-jets over Holleys because they're more reliable and are more consistant. Isn't that what you want for racing?
As for performance, a lot of people prefer Q-jets over Holleys because they're more reliable and are more consistant. Isn't that what you want for racing?

Holleys aren't ALL bad, though. They do seem to have more things that can be more easily adjusted - the really fine-tune stuff like air bleeds and such. Might help a pro-level bracket team with good data logging be able to tune the car to a great variety of weather conditions quickly.
Of course, so many adjustments probably contribute to them falling OUT of tune more often...
Holleys also have a slight benefit for all-out WOT performance. Having 4 equal barrels theoretically leads to better fuel distribution, especially on a single-plane, or tunnel-ram. The Q-jet with small primaries and large secondaries would in theory tend to put more fuel to the rear cylinders. Of course, most of the time you're only on the primaries where you get the benefit of finer throttle response and better fuel economy that the small primary bores give.
Plus, a Q-jet just adds to the 'sleeper' look!
Ok, I want to hear more... I was about to buy an Edlebrock Q-jet. Are they that bad?
I've never ran their quadrajets, but why would you pay $50- 100 more for an Edelbrock Q-jet (calibrated to OEM specs) over a Jet built Q-jet that you can get in 3 stages of performance?
Originally posted by Greed4Speed
I've never ran their quadrajets, but why would you pay $50- 100 more for an Edelbrock Q-jet (calibrated to OEM specs) over a Jet built Q-jet that you can get in 3 stages of performance?
I've never ran their quadrajets, but why would you pay $50- 100 more for an Edelbrock Q-jet (calibrated to OEM specs) over a Jet built Q-jet that you can get in 3 stages of performance?


