Whats the future of GM's 3.6L?
I think of the 3.6L as the 3.8L part 2.
Whats going on? I know they are migrating to the DI for all the models now it seems however what is the reason the CTS now uses the 3.0L as the base engine or the SRX/ equinox use the 2.8L and 3.0L? Is it emissions? I dont think it's fuel economy... What gives? I've enjoyed every car/ suv the 3.6L has been in and find it to be a great engine. |
3.6L is in the Camaro, CTS, Enclave, Acadia, Traverse, Lacrosse, and Malibu.
GM has always had multiple V6's. 3.0L with be their new small V6 while the 3.6L is their large V6. Not every vehicle needs a ~300HP engine. |
The 3.6L V6 in the Malibu is non-Direct Injection and a completely different engine than the 3.6L Direct Injected engine in the Camaro, right?
|
Originally Posted by JeremyNYR
(Post 6304694)
The 3.6L V6 in the Malibu is non-Direct Injection and a completely different engine than the 3.6L Direct Injected engine in the Camaro, right?
2.8L in the SRX does not have DI either. |
Originally Posted by Z28x
(Post 6304701)
They are basically the same engine, just one has DI and one doesn't.
2.8L in the SRX does not have DI either. |
Originally Posted by Chrisz24
(Post 6304709)
Isnt that one turbo charged?
|
Doesn't the SRX use the LP9 which is an HFV6?
|
With Ford's 3.7L making more power in non-DI form than the DI3.6, I can't help but wonder if there's some higher-powered variant of this engine coming down the pipeline.
|
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
(Post 6304719)
With Ford's 3.7L making more power in non-DI form than the DI3.6, I can't help but wonder if there's some higher-powered variant of this engine coming down the pipeline.
|
Originally Posted by Jake Robb
(Post 6304719)
With Ford's 3.7L making more power in non-DI form than the DI3.6, I can't help but wonder if there's some higher-powered variant of this engine coming down the pipeline.
|
Originally Posted by jg95z28
(Post 6304731)
Ford determined that DI saw about a 1% benefit on N/A engines and left if out
|
Originally Posted by jg95z28
(Post 6304731)
Interesting article in Hot Rod Magazine on the new Mustang 5.0. Ford determined that DI saw about a 1% benefit on N/A engines and left if out, but open for adding to future turbo/supercharged versions where it would see real benefits. Perhaps that's why it was left off the 3.7L. Which again, makes you wonder what GM has in store for the LLT. :D
|
Originally Posted by Chrisz24
(Post 6304678)
=Whats going on? I know they are migrating to the DI for all the models now it seems however what is the reason the CTS now uses the 3.0L as the base engine or the SRX/ equinox use the 2.8L and 3.0L? Is it emissions? I dont think it's fuel economy...
|
Originally Posted by jg95z28
(Post 6304731)
Interesting article in Hot Rod Magazine on the new Mustang 5.0. Ford determined that DI saw about a 1% benefit on N/A engines and left if out, but open for adding to future turbo/supercharged versions where it would see real benefits. Perhaps that's why it was left off the 3.7L. Which again, makes you wonder what GM has in store for the LLT. :D
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
(Post 6304738)
Okay, then why is GM getting close to 20% increase in power with the 3.6DI vs. the port-injection version? Is GM doing something wrong with PI, or is Ford doing something wrong with DI?
I think the small percentage is a gain in fuel economy. |
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
(Post 6304738)
Okay, then why is GM getting close to 20% increase in power with the 3.6DI vs. the port-injection version? Is GM doing something wrong with PI, or is Ford doing something wrong with DI?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands