Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 12:31 PM
  #1  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

I give credit to Toyota for doing this on the Tacoma, not sure if anyone else does it.....

Make a factory installed, sprayed in bedliner standard, or at the very least an option...
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 12:42 PM
  #2  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

Originally Posted by Darth Xed
I give credit to Toyota for doing this on the Tacoma, not sure if anyone else does it.....

Make a factory installed, sprayed in bedliner standard, or at the very least an option...
Beleive it or not a lot of people don't want a spray on liner.

I love my Line-X liner, but Rhino liner is a little different material. Also if you get a factory spay on you can't get it colored.

But I will definatly agree that it should be an option
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 12:49 PM
  #3  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

Originally Posted by Z28x
Beleive it or not a lot of people don't want a spray on liner.

I love my Line-X liner, but Rhino liner is a little different material. Also if you get a factory spay on you can't get it colored.

But I will definatly agree that it should be an option
A good case for making it optional... I can understand the colored liner, I suppose, but I can't think of many good reasons to NOT have a liner... maybe weight if you were going to race the truck or something.... maybe I just hit on something there... maybe the extra weight would play with fuel economy a little bit... I dunno.


I just think it'd be really convenient to get it from the factory... also, it'd be GREAT for lease customers.

If I lease a vehicle, I don't want to drop a couple hundred bucks or more on something that I can't keep...
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #4  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

A lot of people would rather have drop in

It definatly should be a option. Some dealers let you finance in a spray on by mine couldn't
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 01:53 PM
  #5  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

Originally Posted by Z28x
A lot of people would rather have drop in
I'll never understand that...

I had a drop-in on my ZR-2 way back when (spray-ins were new, the ZR-2 was a 97, bought it new)... it was noisy when it "shuttered" over bumps... it scratched the hell out of the paint underneath.... the plastic warped up front where the bed meets the cab...

A spray in wins easily over drop ins... so much so that I really can't believe why anyone would want a drop-in anymore.

"Removablility" is basically a non-issue, since the bed is all scratched to hell when you remove it... and that's about the only thing I could come up with as a reason to get a drop-in....
Old Jun 6, 2005 | 11:32 PM
  #6  
Red89GTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 589
From: Flounderville, MI, USA
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

I know that nissan has spray in liners on the Titan and I think the Frontier too. Don't know one way or another about any others. Even though I'm not a truck guy, I don't see why anyone wouldn't want a spray in. It helps with NVH, (all that rubber absorbs sound in the otherwise hollow bed area) stops your bed from getting scratched and with no scratches, rust is also reduced. Seems like a good idea to me. Weight might be about the only downside I can think of, but are you really going to notice 30-40lbs in a 5000lb truck?
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 07:41 AM
  #7  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

Drop-in's are better for impact protection.
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 09:37 AM
  #8  
Mervz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 240
From: Weare, NH
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

Originally Posted by Darth Xed
I'll never understand that...

I had a drop-in on my ZR-2 way back when (spray-ins were new, the ZR-2 was a 97, bought it new)... it was noisy when it "shuttered" over bumps... it scratched the hell out of the paint underneath.... the plastic warped up front where the bed meets the cab...
I feel the same way Darth. My ZR2 is all scratched up with an over the rail bedliner. Its too late now to do anything about it, but now that the liner is all warping on the edges, you can see all the scratched paint under it. Ugh...
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 10:03 AM
  #9  
Chrome383Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,043
From: Shelbyville, IN
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

Originally Posted by Z28x
Drop-in's are better for impact protection.
Maybe so - but most I've ever seen are those slick plastic so it needs to have "impact protection."

The spray-ons have an excellent Coeffecient of Friction so if your object has any weight to it at all - it won't move.
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #10  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

What about a composit inner bed? Didn't the Silverado or Av offer it?

<--- not caught up on trucks
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 11:56 AM
  #11  
AronZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,276
From: Chattanoga & Franklin
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

I think a spray in liner is a great option. GM doesn't have to waist money painting a bed that will get scratched up anyways.

Maybe GM will make composite plastic beds optional. I know it was an option on the GMT-800, and the new Tacoma comes with a composite bed too.
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 12:23 PM
  #12  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

Originally Posted by AronZ28
Maybe GM will make composite plastic beds optional.
Maybe composite armor, too...
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 09:40 AM
  #13  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

Originally Posted by Z28x
Drop-in's are better for impact protection.
Yeah, and better to drive your 1995 Ford Taurus into as it blends into the night after it flew out of the back of a Ranger....
I hate drop in liners....
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 09:42 AM
  #14  
falchulk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,881
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

Nissan was the first to offer the factory spray in liner. Toyota was the first to off the composite bed that never rusts or dents.
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #15  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Re: Something I'd like to see from GM on the GMT-900 trucks...

Originally Posted by falchulk
Nissan was the first to offer the factory spray in liner. Toyota was the first to off the composite bed that never rusts or dents.
What year was the Toyo and what year did the Silverado start offering it?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45 AM.