Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Official Picture of the new GTR and info. Corvette Killer

Old 10-16-2007, 04:02 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
skorpion317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
I can do math on power/weight ratios.
The Z06 has a 6.13 power-to-weight ratio - 505 HP, 3100 lbs.

The top-level GT-R has been hyped (I won't even say rumor) as having 530 HP, and lots of carbon fiber. From a base weight of 3800 lbs., I figure a realistic weight drop would be to around 3600 lbs. The GT-R's power to weight ratio, using those figures, is 6.79. If we go a little more extreme with the weight reduction, say another two hundred pounds (down to 3400), the GT-R's power-to-weight ratio goes to 6.41.

The base-model GT-R is supposed to have 450 HP, carrying 3800 lbs. That's a power-to-weight ratio of 8.44.

I don't know about you, but that hardly screams "Corvette-Killer" to me.
skorpion317 is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 04:27 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
My Red 93Z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE, Ohio
Posts: 1,504
Originally Posted by Russ99TA
Of course it was stock. lol like aftermarket companies have even gotten there hands on it.
Yeah, because the engineers at nissan have no idea how to turn up the boost and add more fuel than stock

Not saying they did or didn't...just saying
My Red 93Z-28 is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 04:59 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
Evilfrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Alton IL
Posts: 751
Originally Posted by Russ99TA
Of course it was stock. lol like aftermarket companies have even gotten there hands on it.
Maybe a better question would be if the car was equipe as it will be when it is sold as a production car.
Evilfrog is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 05:25 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
RussStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Exton, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,011
Originally Posted by Russ99TA
Of course it was stock. lol like aftermarket companies have even gotten there hands on it.
He means was it as it will be from the factory? I bet it wasn't. There are no official times yet, so there is no reason to compare your bogus time for the Nissan to other production ready cars. Nissan is just trying to build hype, and the fanboys are getting hard ons over it. I don't see Z06 killer written anywhere on any of this information. I like how they mention its "staggering" 192 mph top speed.

My money is on the top end version being much more than $76,000. An extremely low volume, carbon fiber intensive car is not going to be cheap. Again, Nissan is just trying to spread the hype. As far as your stupid comment about GTR+chip>Z06 with procharger. Even if that were true, and I don't think it is, the Blue Devil/ZR1 Corvette will be out shortly, and it is boosted from the factory, just like the GTR. Wonder which one will hand the other one their ***?

And just to clarify, I may own a Camaro, but I am not a domestic guy. I am simply a guy who is tired of being told how awesome these cars are from every internet fanboy who has probably never even been around a Skyline in his life. One of the most overrated cars of all time.
RussStang is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 05:36 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
GRNcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: albany, ny
Posts: 666
the thing that pisses me off about this thread is how pushy the op is being about the car like where all supposed to jump on board and love it. Like he is trying to sell us the damn car. Its great he loves it but no need to be so pushy about it.
GRNcamaro is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 05:38 PM
  #51  
Registered User
 
91Z28350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
It's ugly. For 80k, I don't want to drive an ugly car.
Sounds like it is as much of a vette killer as the GT500 was. And please, drop the "They can turn up the boost" BS. You run what ya brung, as the saying goes, and I am betting on the Z06 until proven otherwise.
91Z28350 is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 06:20 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
99SilverSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,463
I'm not crazy about the nose or the headlights but the nack looks good. Interior is nice but the opposite speedo and tach lines kinda clash. Wheels are ok. Brakes are kick azz. Engine looks sweet! The pic showing the trunk makes the rear tires looked tubbed, kinda cool.

Interested to hear the curb weight and official pricing on all variants.
99SilverSS is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 06:25 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
centric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Newhall, CA USA
Posts: 1,023
On seeing the interior, let me amend my position:

Quick or not, that's one fugly bastard, *inside and out.*

Seriously, that may be the most boring, square, workaday interior in any sports car, period. Looks like an early 80s Renault.
centric is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 07:26 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: TX Med Ctr
Posts: 4,000
The 530HP Evo variant might do a 7:38. Honestly I would be more surprised if that version cost only $80,000 rather than if it ran a 7:38 at the Ring.
HAZ-Matt is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 07:33 PM
  #55  
Registered User
 
Z28Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 6,166
Blue Devil Corvette......Procharged Z06......Skyline with chip....
Internet vaporware racing FTW!!!!

I'm not a big fan of the car inside or out, but why not wait to see some tests before making assumptions? And it's pretty amazing that a top speed of 192 MPH is looked down on (I know, I know, the Z06 almost touches 200 but at those speeds what's 5-7 MPH more?).
Z28Wilson is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 07:45 PM
  #56  
Registered User
 
Raven99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lincolnwood IL
Posts: 224
Is it OK to LOVE both cars? I do
Raven99 is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 08:02 PM
  #57  
Registered User
 
RussStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Exton, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,011
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
Internet vaporware racing FTW!!!!

I'm not a big fan of the car inside or out, but why not wait to see some tests before making assumptions? And it's pretty amazing that a top speed of 192 MPH is looked down on (I know, I know, the Z06 almost touches 200 but at those speeds what's 5-7 MPH more?).

Sure, the arguement is vaporware, but the OP made it. A 192mph top speed is great, however it is lost on me how it can be written in such an earth shattering context, given the Vette is already out and will do it faster for a supposedly similiar pricetag.


On another note, why did Nissan decide to hike the price of this new Skyline up over the R34 iterations? Correct me if I am wrong, but roughly translated, the R34 GTR sold for about $45 in Japan I believe.
RussStang is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 08:06 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
Eric Bryant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Michigan's left coast
Posts: 2,405
Originally Posted by Raven99
Is it OK to LOVE both cars?
Nope - I'm pretty sure that's against the rules of this message board. You should pick one or the other to defend, and eschew objectivity.
Eric Bryant is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 08:38 PM
  #59  
Registered User
 
91Z28350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
Man, it may be the best thing since sliced bread. But, IMO, it is ugly. If it beats the Z06, hats off to it, BUT it is still an unattractive car IMO. It is not unfeasible for me to buy a Z06, in the end, my pocket book will do the talking(though I am far more likely to buy a top end Challenger and maybe a camaro or 'z51 Vette).
91Z28350 is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 08:44 PM
  #60  
Registered User
 
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Middle of Kansas
Posts: 2,688
Interesting.

I don't like the view of the roofline from the side.
OutsiderIROC-Z is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Official Picture of the new GTR and info. Corvette Killer



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 PM.