Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

I officially decided that I am against the Bailout...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2008, 04:48 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
formula79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 3,698
I officially decided that I am against the Bailout...

At this point...the bailout is starting to not make sense. It is like you have a sick patient and you keep dangling medicine as long as you can then chop their knees off. The hoops are getting ridiculous, and it is wasting energy GM could be using to plan either another way to get cash..or how to survive bankrupty. It's kinda like when Donald Trump was almost bankrupt. He basically sat all his creditors down and said.."Hey you have a way better chance of getting your money back if I am not ruined and can make things right". I think this bail out mess has pushed the unions and everyone envolved to realize it is serious, and everyone could be on the streets..so GM does have more negotiating room now. Even if they file bankrupty...IF they can make it out..at least they will not have the government telling it what to make.

I mean the thing that hits me most is..I just can't think of a way GM can take this government money..and come out better...or the kind of company that can compete with Toyota.

Last edited by formula79; 12-11-2008 at 04:51 PM.
formula79 is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 05:18 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
And what about Chrysler? It's owner (Cerberus) has over $20 billion in liquid cash and generates revenues of $100 billion per year.

Cerberus shouldn't get a free ride here...
Z284ever is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 05:26 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
SSbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,123
Originally Posted by Z284ever
And what about Chrysler? It's owner (Cerberus) has over $20 billion in liquid cash and generates revenues of $100 billion per year.

Cerberus shouldn't get a free ride here...
Absolutely! Cerberus doesn't deserve a cent! They're not in any financial trouble.

Btw I read it would take years for GM to restructure under Ch11?
SSbaby is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 05:32 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
onebadponcho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Shelton, WA
Posts: 954
Originally Posted by formula79
At this point...the bailout is starting to not make sense. It is like you have a sick patient and you keep dangling medicine as long as you can then chop their knees off. The hoops are getting ridiculous, and it is wasting energy GM could be using to plan either another way to get cash..or how to survive bankrupty. It's kinda like when Donald Trump was almost bankrupt. He basically sat all his creditors down and said.."Hey you have a way better chance of getting your money back if I am not ruined and can make things right". I think this bail out mess has pushed the unions and everyone envolved to realize it is serious, and everyone could be on the streets..so GM does have more negotiating room now. Even if they file bankrupty...IF they can make it out..at least they will not have the government telling it what to make.

I mean the thing that hits me most is..I just can't think of a way GM can take this government money..and come out better...or the kind of company that can compete with Toyota.
Are you drunk? Did someone steal your username/access to this site? It seems like up until this, you were a strong proponent of this bailout/loan/whatever.

So now you're seeing the logic for not letting ol' Uncle Sam put his "dick-skinners" where they don't belong huh?

I see one of 3 scenarios occurring:
1. The Detroit 3/2.8/whatever dies a "natural death" (bankruptcy kills them).
2. The Detroit 3/2.8/whatever survives bankruptcy.
3. The Detroit 3/2.8/whatever dies from hanging/strangulation.

If the bailout/loan/whatever is in fact approved, it will have so many strings attached to it that scenario #3 becomes a near certainty.
I think scenario #2 is the best we can hope for.
onebadponcho is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 05:33 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
formula79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 3,698
Yup...I almost wish Mercedes had not sold Chrysler.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
And what about Chrysler? It's owner (Cerberus) has over $20 billion in liquid cash and generates revenues of $100 billion per year.

Cerberus shouldn't get a free ride here...

Last edited by formula79; 12-11-2008 at 05:39 PM.
formula79 is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 05:34 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by formula79
Yup...I almost wish Mercedes had no sold Chrysler.
Yeah, at least they were already done raping Chrysler.....
Z284ever is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 05:38 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
formula79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 3,698
I am for a "low interest loan" along the lines of what Wall Street got.with common sense strings. I AM NOT for what is about to be agreed on...which is not enough money to fix the issue, and makes the big 3 essentially puppets of the government forced to make what Uncle Sam wants and not what i want. Not when import makers don't have to play by the same rules.

Originally Posted by onebadponcho
Are you drunk? Did someone steal your username/access to this site? It seems like up until this, you were a strong proponent of this bailout/loan/whatever.

So now you're seeing the logic for not letting ol' Uncle Sam put his "dick-skinners" where they don't belong huh?

I see one of 3 scenarios occurring:
1. The Detroit 3/2.8/whatever dies a "natural death" (bankruptcy kills them).
2. The Detroit 3/2.8/whatever survives bankruptcy.
3. The Detroit 3/2.8/whatever dies from hanging/strangulation.

If the bailout/loan/whatever is in fact approved, it will have so many strings attached to it that scenario #3 becomes a near certainty.
I think scenario #2 is the best we can hope for.
formula79 is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 05:50 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
scott9050's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Panhandle of West Virginia
Posts: 1,548
I am starting to agree with this. The strings are getting ridiculous, the money not what they said they needed and the car Czar provision is giving a lot of power away.
scott9050 is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 07:17 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
My Red 93Z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE, Ohio
Posts: 1,504
Originally Posted by scott9050
I am starting to agree with this. The strings are getting ridiculous, the money not what they said they needed and the car Czar provision is giving a lot of power away.
I'm not going to lie, I haven't been paying a lot of attention to this the last couple of days...the $14 or $15b that is in this bailout...is it coming from the $25b they were already supposed to get? I did see that this was supposed to help GM until March...is that when they may or may not get the rest of the $34b that they asked for? Ford is out now correct? I did see where the Car Czar could force the automaker into bankruptcy if he/she thought they weren't on the right path.
My Red 93Z-28 is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 07:53 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
ForYourMalice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Filthydelphia, PA
Posts: 204
Not to mention that Lutz, without even flinching, came out and said they're going to turn around and ask for more next year. I mean I like and respect the man because of his no BS approach, but the fact that they're publicly saying this before this one even gets through is testament to how pointless it is. This would be just the tip of the iceberg. Its an effing joke, it has to stop. If we as a country were told to imagine the audacity of these bailouts 10-15 years ago it would be beyond comprehension. Yet here we are - thanks, Fed

You can call it a "loan" if you want to try and justify it, but its still a bailout.
ForYourMalice is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 08:11 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
flowmotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Originally Posted by ForYourMalice
Not to mention that Lutz, without even flinching, came out and said they're going to turn around and ask for more next year. I mean I like and respect the man because of his no BS approach, but the fact that they're publicly saying this before this one even gets through is testament to how pointless it is. This would be just the tip of the iceberg. Its an effing joke, it has to stop. If we as a country were told to imagine the audacity of these bailouts 10-15 years ago it would be beyond comprehension. Yet here we are - thanks, Fed

You can call it a "loan" if you want to try and justify it, but its still a bailout.
Everyone knows they're coming back for more money. These are just the "bridge" loans to get them over until next year when Obama can worry about how much money they really need.

However the GOP will be significantly less powerful next year, so they are trying to get the concessions while they can.
flowmotion is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 08:37 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
CLEAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 2,576
Originally Posted by formula79
I AM NOT for what is about to be agreed on...which is not enough money to fix the issue, and makes the big 3 essentially puppets of the government forced to make what Uncle Sam wants and not what i want.
That, in a nutshell, is exactly how I feel. I'm getting a big urge to get all the GM stuff that I like now (Camaro, G8, maybe a CTS for the wife) because I just have this bad feeling that the "car czar" and I won't agree on what is a desireable product. Kind of like if you were in the market in about '70, and you saw the writing on the wall, in just a few short years, the product coming out of Detroid was VASTLY different.
CLEAN is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 08:39 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
CLEAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 2,576
Originally Posted by ForYourMalice
Not to mention that Lutz, without even flinching, came out and said they're going to turn around and ask for more next year. I mean I like and respect the man because of his no BS approach, but the fact that they're publicly saying this before this one even gets through is testament to how pointless it is. This would be just the tip of the iceberg. Its an effing joke, it has to stop. If we as a country were told to imagine the audacity of these bailouts 10-15 years ago it would be beyond comprehension. Yet here we are - thanks, Fed

You can call it a "loan" if you want to try and justify it, but its still a bailout.
The way this round is being packaged, its pretty widely accepted that it's a bridge until the new president/congress is in place to hook them up w/ the rest.
CLEAN is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 08:45 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
My Red 93Z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE, Ohio
Posts: 1,504
Originally Posted by CLEAN
The way this round is being packaged, its pretty widely accepted that it's a bridge until the new president/congress is in place to hook them up w/ the rest.
That's kind of what I was thinking since its less than half of what they were asking for.
My Red 93Z-28 is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 08:58 PM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
formula79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 3,698
Thats a even more ominous prospect. For instance, congress wanted Detroit to agree to never sue states again over emissions laws (something to that effect)...and Bush ran block and got that pulled from the language.

Originally Posted by CLEAN
The way this round is being packaged, its pretty widely accepted that it's a bridge until the new president/congress is in place to hook them up w/ the rest.
formula79 is offline  


Quick Reply: I officially decided that I am against the Bailout...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.