GM To Ax 25K Jobs By '08?
GM To Ax 25K Jobs By '08?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...700478_pf.html
Apparently Wagoner plans to cut costs by downsizing approximately 25,000 jobs
in an attempt to save about $2.5B annually. Also of interest his emphasis on the high health care cost of its union employees. GM's NA unit must be worse off long term than I thought. Do any of you feel that this move is a harbinger of worse things to come or rather a good strategic move to shore up a sagging business unit? IOW's, are these cuts enought to right the ship and stop the bleeding or is something more drastic in order?
Apparently Wagoner plans to cut costs by downsizing approximately 25,000 jobs
in an attempt to save about $2.5B annually. Also of interest his emphasis on the high health care cost of its union employees. GM's NA unit must be worse off long term than I thought. Do any of you feel that this move is a harbinger of worse things to come or rather a good strategic move to shore up a sagging business unit? IOW's, are these cuts enought to right the ship and stop the bleeding or is something more drastic in order?
Re: GM To Ax 25K Jobs By '08?
Also, all those jobs might not be lost. The positions may be eliminaed but workers moved to diffrent positions. Either that or they are going to move even more production offshore. That would suck. I agree with the health costs, something has to be done to bring them into alignment with the rest of the world.
Re: GM To Ax 25K Jobs By '08?
http://money.cnn.com/2005/06/07/news...ex.htm?cnn=yes
Note the quick pole and the results at the bottom.
Randy
Note the quick pole and the results at the bottom.
Randy
Re: GM To Ax 25K Jobs By '08?
HAHA. Thats one way for GM to cut health insurance.
Sometime the UAW will learn in a hurry. They are not competing for jobs just here in america. They are competing for Jobs across the world. Everyone in IT knows what this is like. As a resault we dont nearly make as much money was we did in the mid 90s. If the UAW cares about its members it will adjust its demands accordenly. But they dont, and they wont. 10 years from now all american cars will be made in Korea.
Sometime the UAW will learn in a hurry. They are not competing for jobs just here in america. They are competing for Jobs across the world. Everyone in IT knows what this is like. As a resault we dont nearly make as much money was we did in the mid 90s. If the UAW cares about its members it will adjust its demands accordenly. But they dont, and they wont. 10 years from now all american cars will be made in Korea.
Last edited by Evilfrog; Jun 7, 2005 at 12:28 PM.
Re: GM To Ax 25K Jobs By '08?
GM is doing their cuts over a pretty long period of time. Compare that with Daimler's slaghter of Chrysler's workforce a few years ago, almost all concentrated within 2 years. 
Don't cry for the workers. They get extremely good packages, and alot of benefits base on how long they were with the company, so they are hardly going to end up on the streets.
One thing that does intrest me in all this. If GM is cutting about 20% of it's North American workforce, that means that GM is adjusting for a smaller permanent market share, not a growth. In other words, they are setting up to be profitable selling at the current level or less as they are now.

Don't cry for the workers. They get extremely good packages, and alot of benefits base on how long they were with the company, so they are hardly going to end up on the streets.
One thing that does intrest me in all this. If GM is cutting about 20% of it's North American workforce, that means that GM is adjusting for a smaller permanent market share, not a growth. In other words, they are setting up to be profitable selling at the current level or less as they are now.
Re: GM To Ax 25K Jobs By '08?
Originally Posted by guionM
One thing that does intrest me in all this. If GM is cutting about 20% of it's North American workforce, that means that GM is adjusting for a smaller permanent market share, not a growth. In other words, they are setting up to be profitable selling at the current level or less as they are now.

I guess it all depends on if they have enough to do the work now...... or waaaaaaaay to many hands in the pot (which, at least from a decision makers standpoint, it seems like there is ALWAYS too many hands in the pot...)
Re: GM To Ax 25K Jobs By '08?
Originally Posted by guionM
GM is doing their cuts over a pretty long period of time. Compare that with Daimler's slaghter of Chrysler's workforce a few years ago, almost all concentrated within 2 years. 
Don't cry for the workers. They get extremely good packages, and alot of benefits base on how long they were with the company, so they are hardly going to end up on the streets.
One thing that does intrest me in all this. If GM is cutting about 20% of it's North American workforce, that means that GM is adjusting for a smaller permanent market share, not a growth. In other words, they are setting up to be profitable selling at the current level or less as they are now.

Don't cry for the workers. They get extremely good packages, and alot of benefits base on how long they were with the company, so they are hardly going to end up on the streets.
One thing that does intrest me in all this. If GM is cutting about 20% of it's North American workforce, that means that GM is adjusting for a smaller permanent market share, not a growth. In other words, they are setting up to be profitable selling at the current level or less as they are now.

Re: GM To Ax 25K Jobs By '08?
Originally Posted by guionM
One thing that does intrest me in all this. If GM is cutting about 20% of it's North American workforce, that means that GM is adjusting for a smaller permanent market share, not a growth. In other words, they are setting up to be profitable selling at the current level or less as they are now. 

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache...&hl=en&start=1
I'll bet that they planning for this eventual outcome with this recent announcement.
Re: GM To Ax 25K Jobs By '08?
Originally Posted by guionM
GM is doing their cuts over a pretty long period of time. Compare that with Daimler's slaghter of Chrysler's workforce a few years ago, almost all concentrated within 2 years. 
Don't cry for the workers. They get extremely good packages, and alot of benefits base on how long they were with the company, so they are hardly going to end up on the streets.
One thing that does intrest me in all this. If GM is cutting about 20% of it's North American workforce, that means that GM is adjusting for a smaller permanent market share, not a growth. In other words, they are setting up to be profitable selling at the current level or less as they are now.

Don't cry for the workers. They get extremely good packages, and alot of benefits base on how long they were with the company, so they are hardly going to end up on the streets.
One thing that does intrest me in all this. If GM is cutting about 20% of it's North American workforce, that means that GM is adjusting for a smaller permanent market share, not a growth. In other words, they are setting up to be profitable selling at the current level or less as they are now.



