Cellulosic ethanol coming.
Re: Cellulosic ethanol coming.
Very interesting stuff - though I've come to start ignoring news articles on alternative fuels as I tend to read about 10 times as much hype as I *ever* see actually show up at a gas station near me. In other words, I'll believe it when I see it.
Re: Cellulosic ethanol coming.
Originally Posted by Threxx
Very interesting stuff - though I've come to start ignoring news articles on alternative fuels as I tend to read about 10 times as much hype as I *ever* see actually show up at a gas station near me. In other words, I'll believe it when I see it.

Re: Cellulosic ethanol coming.
Originally Posted by guionM
Sewage sludge or coal? 
Makes alot more sense than taking food (corn) and using it to power our vehicles.

Makes alot more sense than taking food (corn) and using it to power our vehicles.

Re: Cellulosic ethanol coming.
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Yeah, I know what you mean. But this seems more promising than corn based ethanol.
The US imports 58% of its oil, so we don't need to shift to 100% Ethanol, Canada and Mexico are safe friends so we really only need about 30-40% of our fuel to come from Ethanol.
Re: Cellulosic ethanol coming.
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Especially since corn uses about a gallon of fossil fuel to get a gallon of ethanol.
Unless you're using nothing but fossil fuels to power all equipment used in the process of growing, harvesting, and converting... that just doesn't make sense.
Re: Cellulosic ethanol coming.
Originally Posted by Threxx
Got a source for that statement?
Unless you're using nothing but fossil fuels to power all equipment used in the process of growing, harvesting, and converting... that just doesn't make sense.
Unless you're using nothing but fossil fuels to power all equipment used in the process of growing, harvesting, and converting... that just doesn't make sense.
This comes directly from the story:
First, it takes a lot of energy to make it. According to the Department of Energy, most studies put the ratio as low as 1:1.4 - meaning that for every one unit of energy spent, only 1.4 units of ethanol energy are created. Indeed, there are some camps who believe producing corn-based ethanol actually results in a net loss of energy.
Re: Cellulosic ethanol coming.
Originally Posted by Threxx
Very interesting stuff - though I've come to start ignoring news articles on alternative fuels as I tend to read about 10 times as much hype as I *ever* see actually show up at a gas station near me. In other words, I'll believe it when I see it.

Re: Cellulosic ethanol coming.
Originally Posted by Z284ever
There are all kinds of sources which say all kinds of things.
This comes directly from the story:
But I remember reading another story where they calculated that for every 1 unit of fossil fuel energy used, corn based ethanol yielded .9 unit of energy.
This comes directly from the story:
But I remember reading another story where they calculated that for every 1 unit of fossil fuel energy used, corn based ethanol yielded .9 unit of energy.
You cannot create energy - you can only assist it in moving from one form of energy to another and assist in its transportation and utilization, so the only way we'll ever be able to come close to cheating that rule of thumb short of nuclear power, is by, for example, 'capturing' energy from the sun via corn crops.
Last edited by Threxx; Jun 23, 2006 at 11:22 AM.
Re: Cellulosic ethanol coming.
Originally Posted by Z28x
There is a company that already does stuff like this, they take old food waste and make Ethanol. I can't remember the co. name.
Re: Cellulosic ethanol coming.
http://www.livescience.com/environme...ol_better.html
"Producing a gallon of ethanol gas from corn requires 95 percent less petroleum than producing a gallon from fossil fuels, a new study finds."
"Producing a gallon of ethanol gas from corn requires 95 percent less petroleum than producing a gallon from fossil fuels, a new study finds."
Re: Cellulosic ethanol coming.
Originally Posted by Threxx
You do realize that units of energy does not necessarily mean fossil fuels, right? Quite a bit of it is just using electricity which yes, some comes from fossil fuels (though mostly coal, which is not what we're in short supply of), some comes from other sources - natural energy, nuclear power, etc...
This new process however, at first look, seems much more promising.
You cannot create energy


