2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Suggestions for the camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 09:27 PM
  #1  
SSRich's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 151
Suggestions for the camaro

I dont know if this thread already exists or not but sorry if it does. Lets give some suggestions for the 5th gen camaro and maybe scott will read them and maybe pass them on.
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #2  
SSRich's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 151
Some of my suggestions is the RS and the Red inteior at this thread http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...=468516&page=2 dont know if it will get them RS grille but love if it does. One other thing i would like to see that i loved on the 1st gen on the RS Z28 SS is the emblems right beside the headlights on the front fender. I hope both rims from the coupe and convertable will be a option not as big but still offered.
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 11:35 PM
  #3  
CamaroZ282008's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 222
From: FLORIDA
How about color matching panels on interior. Example- A Black Camaro's interior panel pieces would be made of a high quality smooth plastic w/clearcoat. The pieces would be like the centerconsole/door trim/and certain parts of the dash. They would be painted the same color as the exterior color with a clearcoat finish. The PT Cruiser and VW beetle have this already I believe. This could be an option for higher models I would suspect like the Z28/SS models as it would be more expensive to produce then a conventional gray/tan/black interior. Also how about to add to this exterior/interior color matching trim what about Ambiencolor by this I mean the interior colored panels would house very small l.e.d.s or led strips that would cast a Ambient color shade on the panels. My idea would be a Black color panel would recieve a shade of blue ambient light to highlight these unique panels. You could also have an option of having like 20 primary color/variations. My point is this would be a little different then a neon light system. Where most neons shine too the dark floor area, or down the side of a door or cieling , the Ambiencolor system would highlight the panels only in a controlled manor. One More Idea...going with the colored interior trim for the second time- how about having trim pieces with the exterior body color painted on them/ a clear over that and on top of the clear coat how about a top cover piece for each interior piece made of a high grade clear lexan about a 1/4 inch above the painted pieces. This clear lexan top housing would hold leds also but since the light is captured, the panels would be highlighted alot more accuratley and you woulden't have scattered light throughout the cabin. Sorry for the long post just a few ideas/suggestions-rob One last thing the lighting features would only be intended for night use for such things as night driving/carshows/dragstrip pit lane and car cruises

Last edited by CamaroZ282008; Jan 29, 2007 at 11:37 PM.
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 09:06 AM
  #4  
HOUSE OF DOOM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15
From: Somerset, MA
Hey whats up guys, been away from the forum ahwhile. Well the convertible concept is exactly what I think this car should be. The interior is absolutely right on. the only thing i would recommend would be adjustable pedals. I know most people dont cars about that, but hey I'm 5'3". I love sports cars but they are uncomfortable to short guys. I had a 04 svt cobra and it was great. The only problem was that I had to push the seat so far forward to be comfortable with the pedals. therfore I couldn't even rest my elbow on the center console. Also getting out was a pain because my seat was so far forward. Besides the pedals I wouldn't touch a thing with that interior, even the colors and seats are slammin.

The exterior looks fine. I think they should offer different grilles for different models. hope they keep the mirrors down to a good size. The stripes if they come with it, hopefully are painted. Maybe like I said if there is different models SS, Z28, Special editions Yenko, COPO, that there would be a similar design in paint as to those cars of the past. All in all the vert concept hit it on the nail. I would just drive that car, except maybe some motor mods. Visually I wouldn't do a thing to it.
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 10:02 AM
  #5  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by HOUSE OF DOOM
Maybe like I said if there is different models SS, Z28, Special editions Yenko, COPO, that there would be a similar design in paint as to those cars of the past.
SS? Yes.

Z/28? Yes.

Yenko? No.

COPO? No.

ZL1? No. (Sorry I added that one. )

SS and Z/28 speak for themselves. As I have said numerous times in the past, SS as the do-it-all performance model. Top end performance, luxury, coupe or convertible, 6-speed manual or auto. The choices are up to you. Z/28 as the road-racer ultra performance model. Coupe only. 6-speed manual only. Limited options, however, its not a stripper. (Think Z06.)

Yenko (Baldwin-Motion, Dana, Nickey, etc.) just doesn't fly. Here is why. Yenkos were special dealer prep cars. Sure some were available outside of the Yenko dealership, however for the most part they were mostly dealer prep cars. That is not to say that I am against dealers making special upgraded performance packages available. However they should be based off the SS and Z/28 packages already available through GM. Besides, the names are all copyrights of various individuals and companies outside of GM. If you think the royalties GM paid for IROC and Trans Am are steep, think of what they'd have to use "Yenko" or "sYc" on their cars. (If anyone doesn't even know what "sYc" signifies, end of discussion right there. )

COPO? Since COPO stands for Central Office Production Order and since COPOs still exist today, that is a mute point. (In otherwords, not for a regular production model.) ZL-1? Not unless it has an aluminum big block. (You can argue all you want about the GMMG Phase III 427 LSx cars by the same name, I still don't think the name fits, nor is it appropriate to resurrect it again.)

Personally I'd rather see GM expand the options on as few of models as possible. Offer a "base" Camaro with several engine options. Start with a base V6, a slightly warmer performance V6 and a base V8 with AFM. Offer a sport package which adds bigger wheels, stiffer suspension and maybe ground effects. (Call it RS if you need to call it anything.) Offer one or two "LT" packages with leather, deluxe interior accoutrements, sunroof, chrome trim etc. Offer various levels of sound systems. Offer various aftermarket wheel and tire choices. Offer various stripe or paint packages so each individual can customize their new Camaro as they see fit.

Then offer the SS and Z/28 with their own set of options as well.

If you do it right, you really don't need more than three models of Camaro. (Not including the convertible, which would be available in "base" and SS only.)

Then leave the supercar versions to the folks like Saleen, Baldwin-Motion (Who have already hinted they would do a LS7 version) and GMMG.

You can keep it simple and still offer a slew of choices at the same time.

Anyway, that's my 2¢.
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 05:21 PM
  #6  
Mjolnir's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 150
Originally Posted by jg95z28
SS? Yes.

Z/28? Yes.

Yenko? No.

COPO? No.

ZL1? No. (Sorry I added that one. )

ZL-1? Not unless it has an aluminum big block. (You can argue all you want about the GMMG Phase III 427 LSx cars by the same name, I still don't think the name fits, nor is it appropriate to resurrect it again.)
I'm not sure I agree with that. For certain hard-core fans and rich wanna-be's a "limited edition" super car has appeal. You have to admit- a ZL1 badged Camaro with an aluminum 427 would be cool, even if the 7.0 isn't a big block. You could sell a bunch of them to the same people that buy Hemi clones for $100,000.

Originally Posted by jg95z28
Then leave the supercar versions to the folks like Saleen, Baldwin-Motion (Who have already hinted they would do a LS7 version) and GMMG.
No arguments here. A new Camaro styled to look like one of the world's most iconic muscle cars? This car is a speed-shop marketing managers wet dream.
Do you smell that? That's the odor of every tuner company in the world wetting themselves over the thought of this car with their graphics at SEMA. Any idiot can crank out 600 horse with an LSx motor, so now they just have to market it right.
Old Jan 31, 2007 | 10:09 AM
  #7  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Mjolnir
I'm not sure I agree with that. For certain hard-core fans and rich wanna-be's a "limited edition" super car has appeal. You have to admit- a ZL1 badged Camaro with an aluminum 427 would be cool, even if the 7.0 isn't a big block. You could sell a bunch of them to the same people that buy Hemi clones for $100,000.
For the record, GM has never built a ZL1 badged Camaro. The original ZL1s had no badges. Kind of like the 1st year Z/28s (no badges and no engine displacement outside the hood) which actually looked like 6-cylinder plain Janes to which someone added runway stripes.

A limited edition super car is cool, and what I am saying and have been saying for quite sometime along with several others here is that Camaro should be the Z/28. However I'm not talking about a $100k super Camaro. (The market for that would be quite small.) I'm talking about a $40k+ Camaro that can smoke the Shelby GT500 and the Challenger. GMMG, Saleen and Baldwin-Motion can then build the $100k ultra-super Camaros then if they like, and sell less than 100 a year at that price.
Old Jan 31, 2007 | 05:34 PM
  #8  
Silver2009's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 157
From: Phoenix AZ
Pontiac paid the SCCA $20 per car. Not earth shattering. Never heard what IROC got for the Camaro, but I'm sure that it was reasonable at the time.

I think the point is that there will surely be "tuner" versions of the 5th gen AKA Saleen, Rousch, GMMC, etc. It's unfathomable that those guys won't get involved for what will most likely be the final glory days of internal combustion engine performance.
Old Feb 1, 2007 | 12:37 PM
  #9  
blue 79 Z/28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,000
From: Richmond B.C.
i said it before and ill say it again, quality modern interior thats alot different then the concepts thats for sure!
Old Feb 1, 2007 | 02:37 PM
  #10  
Good Ph.D's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,597
From: Mack and Bewick
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Since COPO stands for Central Office Production Order and since COPOs still exist today, that is a mute point.
The word you are looking for is "moot".

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/moot
Old Feb 1, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #11  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Good Ph.D
The word you are looking for is "moot".

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/moot
Thank you kind sir. You are correct. I am merely a humble engineer.
Old Feb 1, 2007 | 04:38 PM
  #12  
Hawk312's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 225
From: York, Pa

Body color matching guages.
Body color matching guages.
Body color matching guages.


You know, like the ones in the GTO.

Also, please have a tan interior option.
Old Feb 1, 2007 | 05:37 PM
  #13  
Mjolnir's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 150
Originally Posted by jg95z28
For the record, GM has never built a ZL1 badged Camaro. The original ZL1s had no badges. Kind of like the 1st year Z/28s (no badges and no engine displacement outside the hood) which actually looked like 6-cylinder plain Janes to which someone added runway stripes.

A limited edition super car is cool, and what I am saying and have been saying for quite sometime along with several others here is that Camaro should be the Z/28. However I'm not talking about a $100k super Camaro. (The market for that would be quite small.) I'm talking about a $40k+ Camaro that can smoke the Shelby GT500 and the Challenger. GMMG, Saleen and Baldwin-Motion can then build the $100k ultra-super Camaros then if they like, and sell less than 100 a year at that price.
I'm not saying GM did badge a car ZL1. I'm also not saying they should build a $100k Super Camaro.

I'm saying they should build a $50,000+ Camaro, they shouldbadge it ZL1, and they should sell it to people with more money than brains. A 427 and some badging shouldn't cost $15,000 more than an SS, but people would pay $15,000 more for it. Maybe.
Old Feb 1, 2007 | 06:21 PM
  #14  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Thank you kind sir. You are correct. I am merely a humble engineer.
It's a moo point. You know, like a cow makes. That's why it's not important.

Old Feb 1, 2007 | 11:37 PM
  #15  
camarolvr69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 138
From: San Diego, CA
my suggestion-1.offer a stripper model with a big motor (ie. dodge dart with 383)
2.offer either a bolt in solid axle,or have as an option
3.slap the supervette motor (6.2L supercharged) into some version of the camaro



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 PM.