JCS30TH

I was going to say pretty much the same thing.

Plague

well, maybe a better question would be, who would not buy a camaro if it had a rear seat for 3? wouldn't rule it out for me. I think I might even like it.

blackrat

the car cant be everything to everyone. theres a reason they made cars like the bbody impalas and thats for situations like this. any comparisons to the first gens having 3 seatbelts is null because they had to abide to 40 year old regs. its a little differant now.

Plague

what current sedan would compare to a camaro through with 3 seats? an 303hp certainly would not.

blackrat

charger rt or srt. and it could fit 5 comfortable too. you trade off with the weight gain and handling loss though.

dave_z28

its funny you say this, because my moms bf has a 2002 ss vert (35th ann) but anywayz, hes got one kid, and i have a sister (so a total of 5) and when we all go out together, his kid sits on the hump, and we cross the 2 belts in the back, to the opposite buckle, and it works.

skibbez93z

u have had a hump rider before (in the 30th)... the most to ever fit has been 6 in the 93 once.... that will never happen again......

romoranger

i put four girls in the back of mine one time when my car was still there for DD duty..... it was sweet

PaintBallR

I think a bench in the back is a better idea in general. If you have 2+2 seating, the 2 in the back will be alot more comfotable with a bench rather than 2 little seats that thier butts just fit in. Or You could have a add on that you can place on top of the hump to make it a bench when you have to take that 5th person.

I'm all for a bench in the back.

Mjolnir

+1
Although I have five kids, so it would mostly just cut down on the arguing about who goes with dad in the Camaro and who goes with mom in the soccer van.

User56898

67's have seatbelts!

guess i forgot to put them in......

camarolvr69

whats the point of a bench seat? the people who sit on it would fly around at any sort of speed.