V6 Tech 1967-2002 V6 Engine Related

3.8 supercharger

Old 06-30-2011, 02:37 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chevys89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Buckner,Missouri
Posts: 25
3.8 supercharger

I was wondering if a supercharger from a Grand am 3.8 would fix on my 96 camaro 3.8
chevys89 is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 05:47 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Evolution223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 470
Re: 3.8 supercharger

that question has been asked a million times. unfortunatly it won't, only because there is not enough room for the intake since the Grand Am was a FWD car. Might as well just buy the Grand Am.
Evolution223 is offline  
Old 07-01-2011, 03:15 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chevys89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Buckner,Missouri
Posts: 25
Re: 3.8 supercharger

damn I was hoping it would. I was going to put some header on it then try to find a 3.8 supercharger to see if it would have fit that would be bad *** a v-6 with headers and a supercharger
chevys89 is offline  
Old 07-04-2011, 03:01 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
transamtom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: niagara falls ont. canada
Posts: 906
Re: 3.8 supercharger

Originally Posted by chevys89
damn I was hoping it would. I was going to put some header on it then try to find a 3.8 supercharger to see if it would have fit that would be bad *** a v-6 with headers and a supercharger
It will fit but there are a few things you need to do.

Here are couple of links:

http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread.php?t=81049

http://forum.camarov6.com/showthread.php?t=102815
transamtom is offline  
Old 07-11-2011, 09:01 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Need4Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,459
Re: 3.8 supercharger

Originally Posted by chevys89
damn I was hoping it would. I was going to put some header on it then try to find a 3.8 supercharger to see if it would have fit that would be bad *** a v-6 with headers and a supercharger
It fits, but you have to cut into the S/C and there's a good bit of modification / custom fabrication involved. Im not sure to the degree of expenses but I know most people who have done it say it's not worth it.
Need4Camaro is offline  
Old 07-20-2011, 12:01 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
94sabreslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32
Re: 3.8 supercharger

that's not entirely accurate. In the early 90's, pontiac did a test TA with a 3800 supercharged in it, and while yes there was some fancy fabrication, they managed to make it fit without having to cut the cowl or significantly modify the firewall. GM DID IT!!! so it is absolutely possible to make one fit without cutting anything bodywise. Sure, you need a trick intake elbow, but if you know what your are doing, that's it. GM also had it tuned to roughly 300 hp in 93 or 94 when they did the concept cars.

Also, unless you have the complete motor, you will need to swap everything from the heads up, as the injector bosses on the supercharged motors are in the heads, not the intake as per a naturally aspirated motors.
94sabreslinger is offline  
Old 07-23-2011, 07:49 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Evolution223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 470
Re: 3.8 supercharger

there are companies that make kits to supercharge a RWD 3800 but be prepared to pay about $2500 just for the kit,

can someone link to one of those companies again?
Evolution223 is offline  
Old 07-31-2011, 07:04 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
rv93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 563
Re: 3.8 supercharger

Originally Posted by 94sabreslinger
that's not entirely accurate. In the early 90's, pontiac did a test TA with a 3800 supercharged in it, and while yes there was some fancy fabrication, they managed to make it fit without having to cut the cowl or significantly modify the firewall. GM DID IT!!! so it is absolutely possible to make one fit without cutting anything bodywise. Sure, you need a trick intake elbow, but if you know what your are doing, that's it. GM also had it tuned to roughly 300 hp in 93 or 94 when they did the concept cars.

Also, unless you have the complete motor, you will need to swap everything from the heads up, as the injector bosses on the supercharged motors are in the heads, not the intake as per a naturally aspirated motors.
anything is technically possible. gm has a ridiculous budget to blow if they wish to do so. hell, if they really wanted to, they could stick a Lamborghini V12 in my camaro. does that mean its possible for me to do it? no, it doesnt.
rv93 is offline  
Old 07-31-2011, 07:10 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Evolution223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 470
Re: 3.8 supercharger

never the less, I think it was stupid for GM not to put the super charger on the 3.8's since they were already making them for other cars it would have been really easy, I guess they wanted to make everyone to shell out an extra $6k for the Z28.
Evolution223 is offline  
Old 08-01-2011, 02:28 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chevys89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Buckner,Missouri
Posts: 25
Re: 3.8 supercharger

true
chevys89 is offline  
Old 08-01-2011, 09:59 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Need4Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,459
Re: 3.8 supercharger

Originally Posted by 94sabreslinger
that's not entirely accurate. In the early 90's, pontiac did a test TA with a 3800 supercharged in it, and while yes there was some fancy fabrication, they managed to make it fit without having to cut the cowl or significantly modify the firewall. GM DID IT!!! so it is absolutely possible to make one fit without cutting anything bodywise. Sure, you need a trick intake elbow, but if you know what your are doing, that's it. GM also had it tuned to roughly 300 hp in 93 or 94 when they did the concept cars.

Also, unless you have the complete motor, you will need to swap everything from the heads up, as the injector bosses on the supercharged motors are in the heads, not the intake as per a naturally aspirated motors.
Not bashing, but I didnt say you had to modify the body or firewall, I said you have to cut the S/C intake off and redirect it to the side instead of the back or it simply put wont clear the firewall. There's no way around that.

Originally Posted by Evolution223
never the less, I think it was stupid for GM not to put the super charger on the 3.8's since they were already making them for other cars it would have been really easy, I guess they wanted to make everyone to shell out an extra $6k for the Z28.
I agree but in reality if they did that, it would have slaughtered Z28 and SS sales. Think of it...you can have a sporty / quick stout base model V6 capable of stomping on V8's by just adding a Pulley and Intercooler for half the price of a V8 WHILE saving gas too... the V8's would have been slaughtered.

Now...what would have been interesting is to have offered a "performance S/C'd V6" about 3k less than the V8's and 3k more than the V6's....
Need4Camaro is offline  
Old 08-06-2011, 05:37 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Bluechevyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tampa, Fla.
Posts: 63
Re: 3.8 supercharger

Originally Posted by Evolution223
never the less, I think it was stupid for GM not to put the super charger on the 3.8's since they were already making them for other cars it would have been really easy, I guess they wanted to make everyone to shell out an extra $6k for the Z28.
GM didn't want to have a v6 Camaro compete with the Z28
Bluechevyz28 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hal Fisher
Parts For Sale
0
09-30-2015 09:03 PM
SergheiS
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
09-29-2015 08:56 PM
HAWG
Drag Racing Technique
2
09-25-2015 11:41 AM
DelSoto
Forced Induction
4
09-19-2015 05:31 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 3.8 supercharger



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM.