Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

94 z28 vs. 96 mustang GT??

Old 04-14-2009, 08:25 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tanner_94_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nellyville, Mo
Posts: 73
94 z28 vs. 96 mustang GT??

hey you guys i have a 94 camaro z28....and i have the non performance rear end with the 2.73 gears and my friend has a stock 5 speed 96 mustang GT and i was wondering if anyone with a z28 of the same kind raced any mustangs like this both bone stock??
Tanner_94_Z28 is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 08:48 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kantuckee Yo'
Posts: 4,405
The Lt1 will rape that 4.6L SOHC.
wrd1972 is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 08:53 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tanner_94_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nellyville, Mo
Posts: 73
well i wasn't for sure with the 2.73 gears yet...we havn't raced yet lol tho i have complete faith in my lT1!
Tanner_94_Z28 is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 09:53 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kantuckee Yo'
Posts: 4,405
He may get you out of the hole slightly. If he does you will pass him before the 1/8th. get some 3.42's in there and you will be very happy with the low end.
wrd1972 is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 10:06 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
naws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12
i use to own a 97 gt (exactly the same as the 96gt)... regarding the previous comment on a lt1 will rape a 4.6 sohc.. that is incorrect for sure.. the 99-04gt's come with a pi sohc (power improved SOHC) which has a lot of power.. they can be run into the 13's stock i have heard as low as 13.7 from a local guy...

the 96-98gt's however have what is called npi heads/cams/intake (non performance improved) so they only have 225 isntead of the 260 from the pi h/c/i.. my stock 97gt i was only able to run 15.1.. a catback and cai and i ran 14.7... even still that is not quick enough to keep up to a lt1..

so:
lt1 > npi 4.6 sohc
naws is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 10:13 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
6SpdLT1Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lenexa, KS
Posts: 2,598
Your sig says 3.42s

Anyway, either way you should be able to put a easy car length on him on the street.
6SpdLT1Z is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 10:16 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kantuckee Yo'
Posts: 4,405
Originally Posted by naws
i use to own a 97 gt (exactly the same as the 96gt)... regarding the previous comment on a lt1 will rape a 4.6 sohc.. that is incorrect for sure..
lt1 > npi 4.6 sohc
But I was talking about the 96 and not the 99+. The 96 was slow as crap compared to the LT1. What makes that statement incorrect?
wrd1972 is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 10:52 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tanner_94_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nellyville, Mo
Posts: 73
my signature yes says 3.42 i have bought the 3.42 gears but yet to put them on i dont know if i'm not supposed to do that but i wanted to race my friend bone stock against bone stock before i actually did the gear swap and put my mods on
Tanner_94_Z28 is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 02:18 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
bombebomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,856
Originally Posted by 6SpdLT1Z
Your sig says 3.42s

Anyway, either way you should be able to put a easy bus lengths on him on the street.
FIXED They are slow as dirt.

Even on the newer 260hp one's they are by no means a beast (obviously) but half the time they are 5 speeds and no one can drive lol. ( applies to all standards)


Just a little side note this post "might" belong in the lounge.

Last edited by bombebomb; 04-14-2009 at 02:21 PM.
bombebomb is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 03:07 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
6SpdLT1Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lenexa, KS
Posts: 2,598
Originally Posted by bombebomb
FIXED They are slow as dirt.
Yeah I know, I'm not the bragging type. But I did italicize easy
6SpdLT1Z is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 03:33 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
naws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12
Originally Posted by wrd1972
But I was talking about the 96 and not the 99+. The 96 was slow as crap compared to the LT1. What makes that statement incorrect?
ahh i now noticed you specified "That" 4.6... okay i agree you are correct
naws is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 03:50 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
josh77888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 78
my opinion on the 4.6L motor is junk, my buddy has a 95z with intake,headers,exhaust vs 06 mustang GT with an exhaust. My buddy had at least 2 cars on him by 70mph.

mustangs are not fast stock end of story.
josh77888 is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 04:14 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
bombebomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,856
Originally Posted by josh77888
my opinion on the 4.6L motor is junk, my buddy has a 95z with intake,headers,exhaust vs 06 mustang GT with an exhaust. My buddy had at least 2 cars on him by 70mph.

mustangs are not fast stock end of story.
Depends on what you consider fast, coming from an f-body owner they are not fast. They are not your mothers minivan either (unless its a 96-98 ) But yeah, the typical GT is nothing special.
bombebomb is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 04:42 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
mightymouse383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oviedo FL
Posts: 370
SLOWSTANGS...............Enough said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mightymouse383 is offline  
Old 04-14-2009, 06:50 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Bad LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5
Originally Posted by naws
i use to own a 97 gt (exactly the same as the 96gt)... regarding the previous comment on a lt1 will rape a 4.6 sohc.. that is incorrect for sure.. the 99-04gt's come with a pi sohc (power improved SOHC) which has a lot of power.. they can be run into the 13's stock i have heard as low as 13.7 from a local guy...

the 96-98gt's however have what is called npi heads/cams/intake (non performance improved) so they only have 225 isntead of the 260 from the pi h/c/i.. my stock 97gt i was only able to run 15.1.. a catback and cai and i ran 14.7... even still that is not quick enough to keep up to a lt1..

so:
lt1 > npi 4.6 sohc
WTF.... i have a 95 z28 a4 3.42s exhaust only and bald tires!!.... i just raced a 96 gt automatic with full exhaust CAI and 3.73s and a 03 gt automatic full exhaust, CAI drag raidals this past weekend both dig races... before i got outta 1st gear i had 2 cars on on the 96 gt and i was still spinning.. and the 03 gt at 100 there was a 747 between us with me in front!!!! someone stated "slowstangs" no there ****STANGS!!!
Bad LT1 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 94 z28 vs. 96 mustang GT??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 AM.