2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

looked at a 2010 Camaro SS today...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 12, 2009 | 10:12 PM
  #1  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
looked at a 2010 Camaro SS today...

...and was not really overly impressed or moved especially when I saw the $47K sticker price.

In all fairness the 93 4th gens did not move me either but I then fell in love with my 95 drop top.

I did not like the tall look with chop top like windows, the very "plastic'y" dash and the trunk style rear body section. That trunk opening is crazy small too.

Of course the LS3 is bad ***.

I will even venture to say I might like the look of the Mustang better as of right now. Maybe things will change. Just have to wait and see.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 09:02 AM
  #2  
72 Z27's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 149
From: St. Louis, MO
$47k cannot be actual msrp for the car unless it has the 21's/body kit. Find another and don't pay over sticker.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 09:08 AM
  #3  
John_H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 146
Don't judge the car until you can drive it. That's the most important thing when deciding which car to buy.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 03:35 PM
  #4  
z71collector's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 178
From: The Green Mountains
47k is ridiculous. As far as the,"plasicky" dash, I like it. Better then the,"plasticky mustang dash. Because they are BOTH plasticky. Buy a mustang.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 03:47 PM
  #5  
King Moose SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,069
From: Detroit, MI
$47k price on a car can turn any man off, bring your wife next time.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 04:01 PM
  #6  
WhiteHawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 943
Originally Posted by wrd1972
...and was not really overly impressed or moved especially when I saw the $47K sticker price.
I agree. The price is the big turn off on these cars. I think GM is a little over market, and that in a couple years there will be some big incentives. I think the 5th gen V6's are in or above the price of the 4th gens. It is a great car, I am not knocking it, but $47k for a Camaro is nuts. It will be worth less than half that in three years.

-Geoff
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 04:43 PM
  #7  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
In 1989, my brand new loaded Mustang GT was 12.5K IIRC. In 1995 my loaded Z28 Vert was 27K. Damn things have gotten expensive.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 09:22 PM
  #8  
wildpaws's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 287
From: Richmond, VA
Originally Posted by wrd1972
...and was not really overly impressed or moved especially when I saw the $47K sticker price.

In all fairness the 93 4th gens did not move me either but I then fell in love with my 95 drop top.

I did not like the tall look with chop top like windows, the very "plastic'y" dash and the trunk style rear body section. That trunk opening is crazy small too.

Of course the LS3 is bad ***.

I will even venture to say I might like the look of the Mustang better as of right now. Maybe things will change. Just have to wait and see.
I think you'd be hard pressed to option out a 2SS to 47k, sounds like there was a "stealer" value added package included, also known as extra dealer markup. I would agree with your feelings about that particular price, the rest of your perceptions are.....your perceptions, mine are different than yours as I like most everything about the new Camaro.
Clyde
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 10:52 PM
  #9  
FiefSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 873
From: Chicago Burbs
An SS will run you $36k... if they are selling it for $47k... go to another dealership.
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 12:40 AM
  #10  
prophet33's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 186
From: Monroe Wisconsin
paid roughly 31k for my 1ss with sunroof premium sound n auto
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 05:15 PM
  #11  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Originally Posted by FiefSS
An SS will run you $36k... if they are selling it for $47k... go to another dealership.
The sticker said 47K , must have had some premium stuff. I am not looking to buy, I was just checking it out. Mid 30's seems much more practical.
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 06:45 PM
  #12  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
REFUSE CAMARO MARKUPS!!!

Originally Posted by wrd1972
...and was not really overly impressed or moved especially when I saw the $47K sticker price.
Originally Posted by WhiteHawk
I think GM is a little over market
The maximum sticker price of a 5th gen Camaro with no dealer markup and no dealer-installed accessories is $38,775. That's an SS automatic, with the RS package, polished wheels, heated leather seats, the better stereo, a sunroof, Red Jewel Tintcoat paint with hood stripes, and the Inferno Orange interior trim package.

An SS starts at $31,040 (manual trans, cloth seats).

If it was listed at 47k, it either had every possible dealer option (I tried it; without ordering multiples of something, the highest you can get is $46,120), or the dealer adjusted the price to pad his own wallet. Odds are in favor of the latter. Try a different dealership, and make sure you let the general manager of that dealership know that his greed is making you shop elsewhere.
Old Jun 14, 2009 | 07:13 PM
  #13  
2010SSVERT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 200
From: sunny So-Cal
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
If it was listed at 47k, it either had every possible dealer option (I tried it; without ordering multiples of something, the highest you can get is $46,120), or the dealer adjusted the price to pad his own wallet.
Maybe they are just adding in the V.A.T. a little early?
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 07:00 AM
  #14  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by 2010SSVERT
Maybe they are just adding in the V.A.T. a little early?
Kentucky doesn't have a VAT that I'm aware of. They have a 6% sales tax, which brings the fully-loaded (without dealer accessories) total to $41,101.
Old Jun 15, 2009 | 03:01 PM
  #15  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Interesting.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djangoroar
Parts Wanted
2
Feb 21, 2015 11:47 PM
Donwest22
Parts Wanted
3
Jan 14, 2015 03:56 PM
Donwest22
Parts Wanted
0
Dec 12, 2014 05:58 PM
Red_94Formula
Parts Wanted
0
Dec 6, 2014 11:07 PM
Makaveli
Car Audio and Electronics
0
Jul 29, 2002 01:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.