

|
05-01-2009, 10:13 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN & La Porte, IN
Posts: 647
|
LS3 v L99?
Whats the difference? Is one better? I'm good with the LT1 engine, and SBCs for the most part. Know a little about the LS1. Don't really understand any of the other ones though, the newer stuff goes over my head? Anyone want to give a break down?
__________________
1996 Z28 T-Tops BUILT A4-Its quick  when it runs right.
2003 Cadillac CTS Daily Driver
|
|
|
05-01-2009, 11:52 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19z28camaro02
Whats the difference? Is one better? I'm good with the LT1 engine, and SBCs for the most part. Know a little about the LS1. Don't really understand any of the other ones though, the newer stuff goes over my head? Anyone want to give a break down?
|
They are basically the same engine, sort of. The LS3 is the exact same engine that is in the C6 Vette, just a different exhaust in the SS, hence the 4HP less. The L99 is the LS3 but they did some modifications to it in order to include AFM (Active Fuel Management) and VVT. I believe that the cylinder walls in the block were made thicker so it could handle AFM, which the LS3 has issues with AFM. The LS3 puts out 426HP/420 lbs of torque while the L99puts out 400HP/410 lbs of torque. With the taller gearing of the A6 transmission and the L99 the car basically is even in terms of 0-60 times and 1/4 mile times as the LS3 and the M6 transmission. The L99 is about 1 or 2 mpg better in fuel efficiency then the LS3. So in other words even though the L99 puts out 26HP less and 10 lbs of torque less than the LS3, both engines are essentially equal.
|
|
|
05-02-2009, 12:26 AM
|
#3
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 7,542
|
The cylinder walls are the same. The only differences are the inclusion of AFM and VVT in the L99, along with a less aggressive camshaft (which is necessary because the special lifters needed for AFM can't handle the LS3's aggressive lobe profiles) and a corresponding tune. I'm not sure, but I suspect that the L99's engine computer is different. Specifically, it should include the ability to control the AFM and VVT systems. It's possible that the LS3's computer is the same, with those capabilities disabled.
I haven't seen an L99 dyno graph yet, but VVT should broaden the power band on the L99 compared to the LS3.
__________________
2002 NBM Camaro Z28 M6 - best ET 13.21, best MPH 108.9, best 60' 2.14 - 325hp/343tq - Lid, Corsa, SixSpeedsInc T56, Pro 5.0 w/ short stick, 17x9 wheels
1987 Buick Grand National - best ET 13.66, best MPH 101.5, best 60' 2.08 - 253hp/334tq - 93 chip, RJC, meth, Hooker catback, 160 t-stat, shift kit, no-hop bars
|
|
|
05-14-2009, 11:54 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jeffersonville, Indiana
Posts: 17
|
The 2 gents above nailed it.
The L99 does make less hp and torque than the LS3 but I think the aftermarket is going to be very kind to the L99. Comp Cams already has a Phase Limiter Kit that enhances the variable valve timing technology of the L99 that is supposed to make huge peak gains without sacrificing low end.
http://www.camaroz28.com/forums/showthread.php?t=674859
There are going to be some DIRTY L99's out there!
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 PM.
|