Old 09-11-2008, 12:10 PM   #1
Need4Camaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,324
Send a message via AIM to Need4Camaro
Recommended Octane, this confuses me...

Typically the recommended Octane is determined by the Compression Ratio. The higher the Compression Ratio, the higher octane you'll need to prevent pre-detonation.

If you look here...

http://www.chevrolet.com/camaro/pdf/...ifications.pdf

The V6 Camaro actually has a HIGHER Compression Ratio than the V8... Yet the V8 is recommended to use Premium while the V6 is not

V6 - 11.3:1 - Recommended - REGULAR Octane
V8 - 10.7:1 - Recommended - PREMIUM Octane...

Alittle contradicting???

Anyway - at that level of compression, would you think the V6 would benefit from using Premium + a tune?
__________________
Coming Soon - Firebird LS1 Swap with Boltons OR V6 2010 Camaro -- Your Final Day - You will watch your life flash before your eyes. Ask yourself, will it truly be something worth watching?
Need4Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2008, 01:00 PM   #2
cause4panic
Registered User
 
cause4panic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 435
direct injection allows for a higher compression ratio at lower octane ratings
__________________
1982 Caprice two door 1996 LT1/4L60e , 8.5" 10 bolt 3.90 eaton disk brakes, 3500 stall, Custom tranny by me, MPT70 turbo, AlkyControl PIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by GUTTERbOY View Post
Fascinating how a little panic can turn off all higher brain functions in a human being.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssvegas View Post
i love the feeling of the roid splitting
cause4panic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2008, 05:59 PM   #3
bombebomb
Registered User
 
bombebomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by cause4panic View Post
direct injection allows for a higher compression ratio at lower octane ratings
Thats awesom iv learned something today.
__________________
94' z28 lt1 383, A4, 160 t-stat, CAI,Spohn LCA's,Nittos 555R,3.73's,Tuned, e-waterpump, TD's magnaflow, Pacesetter LT's, Stock Heads,
Compstar 6"rod, compstar 3.75 crank,JE pistons,lunati cam, 1.6pro mag
Nitrous hardend rings, 4bolt splayed. 12.2 @114
www.L99Tech.com
bombebomb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2008, 06:59 PM   #4
Need4Camaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,324
Send a message via AIM to Need4Camaro
Quote:
Originally Posted by cause4panic View Post
direct injection allows for a higher compression ratio at lower octane ratings
Cool, howcome they didnt do that for the LS3/L99 Model though? A 400 HP 87 Octane car would've been awsome...
__________________
Coming Soon - Firebird LS1 Swap with Boltons OR V6 2010 Camaro -- Your Final Day - You will watch your life flash before your eyes. Ask yourself, will it truly be something worth watching?
Need4Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2008, 07:34 PM   #5
bombebomb
Registered User
 
bombebomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by Need4Camaro View Post
Cool, howcome they didnt do that for the LS3/L99 Model though? A 400 HP 87 Octane car would've been awsome...
My guess is cost. I think it has been discussed before.
__________________
94' z28 lt1 383, A4, 160 t-stat, CAI,Spohn LCA's,Nittos 555R,3.73's,Tuned, e-waterpump, TD's magnaflow, Pacesetter LT's, Stock Heads,
Compstar 6"rod, compstar 3.75 crank,JE pistons,lunati cam, 1.6pro mag
Nitrous hardend rings, 4bolt splayed. 12.2 @114
www.L99Tech.com
bombebomb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2008, 09:23 PM   #6
Grape Ape
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 94
The V6 is from the “next generation” whereas the LS3/L99 is probably the last V8 of it’s generation. The next V8 should have DI.

The V6 is also aided by more carefully designed cooling including oil squirters that cool the pistons from below.

Detonation is cause by temperature which is the total of:

Intake air temp
+
heat left in the chamber from the last charge

These are multiplied (not literally) by compression. So if you can reduce one factor (chamber temp or intake air temp) you can safely increase another (compression).
Grape Ape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 12:10 AM   #7
Need4Camaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,324
Send a message via AIM to Need4Camaro
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grape Ape View Post
The V6 is from the “next generation” whereas the LS3/L99 is probably the last V8 of it’s generation. The next V8 should have DI.

The V6 is also aided by more carefully designed cooling including oil squirters that cool the pistons from below.

Detonation is cause by temperature which is the total of:

Intake air temp
+
heat left in the chamber from the last charge

These are multiplied (not literally) by compression. So if you can reduce one factor (chamber temp or intake air temp) you can safely increase another (compression).
With that stated, do you think we can expect a change in the Camaro's V8 motor much like we experienced with between 97 and 98 with the 4th Gens? (LT1 to LS1)
__________________
Coming Soon - Firebird LS1 Swap with Boltons OR V6 2010 Camaro -- Your Final Day - You will watch your life flash before your eyes. Ask yourself, will it truly be something worth watching?
Need4Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 08:32 AM   #8
cause4panic
Registered User
 
cause4panic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 435
There is no fuel in the combustion chamber to pre ignite while the compression cycle is occuring. Fuel is injected at high pressure just before ignition occurs.
__________________
1982 Caprice two door 1996 LT1/4L60e , 8.5" 10 bolt 3.90 eaton disk brakes, 3500 stall, Custom tranny by me, MPT70 turbo, AlkyControl PIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by GUTTERbOY View Post
Fascinating how a little panic can turn off all higher brain functions in a human being.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssvegas View Post
i love the feeling of the roid splitting
cause4panic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 05:57 PM   #9
Grape Ape
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by Need4Camaro View Post
With that stated, do you think we can expect a change in the Camaro's V8 motor much like we experienced with between 97 and 98 with the 4th Gens? (LT1 to LS1)
I think that when the new small block is ready GM will look around and see where the return will be highest and put them there (Cadi? trucks? Corvette?). Watch what Ford does with its new twin turbo DI V6 for hints.

If/when the Camaro gets one it will probably be pretty similar output to what it replaces with better mileage, lower displacement. Size and weight could go either way.

But I don’t work for GM and my interest in GM is all post Zeta, so I’m really just guessing so some longterm GM fans may have better guesses.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cause4panic View Post
There is no fuel in the combustion chamber to pre ignite while the compression cycle is occuring. Fuel is injected at high pressure just before ignition occurs.

Sort of. When cruising the DI injector fires close to TDC on the compression stroke to create a small stoichiometric pocket in a much greater volume of air. This means that the computer can hold the throttle open wider at a low load to reduce pumping losses and save fuel.

When under a heavier load the DI injector fires during the intake stroke and uses the incoming air‘s turbulence to distribute the fuel evenly. And of course knock is only ever an issue under heavy loads.

Here is a pretty good wiki article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasoline_Direct_Injection
Grape Ape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2008, 02:01 PM   #10
69-er
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Alamogordo, NM , USA
Posts: 83
There's more to cylinder pressure than just static compression ration. The effects of the cam timing can effect the overall pressures.
69-er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2008, 06:02 AM   #11
SCNGENNFTHGEN
Registered User
 
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 1,496
I read it some where that the DI on the V6, has a cooling affect on the pistons, which allows the higher compression ratio with the lower octane fuel.
__________________
73 Z/28/M21, 94 Z/28/T56, 90 Silverado LT1/A4, 99 Buell X1, 02 Yamaha Raptor 660, 96 Yamaha Warrior "Reality is on vacation, all across a blinded nation.....Mentally under sedation"! >>>> www.honorandremember.org<<>>>.www.woundedwarriorproject.com<<<<
SCNGENNFTHGEN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2009, 07:55 AM   #12
Don 97 SS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Robinson, IL
Posts: 2,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by 69-er View Post
There's more to cylinder pressure than just static compression ration. The effects of the cam timing can effect the overall pressures.
Yes, I understand that overlap plays a role too.
__________________
M6/383Eaglecrank/Lt4heads&manifold/11.8:1cr/ProMag1.6rr/EDtimingset
236/240/110cam/CClifters/Cranedualsprings/DynaSparkOpti/52mmTB
SLPafpr/MSDwires&Digital+/SLPhdrs/Randomcats/LPE3.5shaft/Walbro255
Pulleys/Torsen/SLPpp&flywheel/McLeoddisc/GM3.73gears/LS1brakes
Don 97 SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2009, 04:43 PM   #13
Chevycobb
Registered User
Premium Member
 
Chevycobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 2,076
subscribing for any future posts with info. learned a lot in this thread that I never knew.
__________________
2008 Z06 - black/black, comp gray wheels, mild to wild switch

SOLD 1994 LT1 - forged 357, heads, cam, GMMG cat back and other stuff
Chevycobb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 12:45 AM   #14
Capn Pete
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by 69-er View Post
There's more to cylinder pressure than just static compression ration. The effects of the cam timing can effect the overall pressures.
That and ignition timing too, right? Ignition wasn't mentioned, but it obviously plays a role in the timing of the cycles.

When I first read the spec sheet a few days ago, I was also intrigued at first about the fuel requirement differences, and the high/low comp. ratios of the V6/V8. But then I thought about the D.I. factor, and figured that must be the answer ..... clearly, that's the case .
__________________
2002 Z28: M6, 3.73's, Strano Suspension (HP3) - Goes, Turns, Stops, and even Flies.
1993 Z28: Road Race car - LT1/T56 - SoloSprint #95 - Goes, Blows, Goes and Blows.
1973 Camaro: Dad's - 355, TH350, 4.10's.
1981 Z28: 383 c.i., TH350, 3.42's - sold August, 2000.
Capn Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 12:16 PM   #15
alexss
Registered User
 
alexss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 104
great write up.. im learning alot today...
__________________
1. 2001 camaro z28,..........2. 2002 bmw 325i
3. 2002 camaro SS,,..........4. 2002 M3
5. ?? 2010 camaro SS or corvette Z06??
alexss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply Post New Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1996-2009 CamaroZ28.Com. All rights reserved.
Forums Directory