

|
02-20-2008, 06:51 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 23
|
Concept vs. Preproduction rear
__________________
"We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools."
"Faith is taking the first step, even when you don't see the whole staircase."
*Martin Luther King Jr.*
|
|
|
02-20-2008, 08:01 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 89
|
I guess I don't see much of a difference at all apart from minor details such as the marker lights, exhaust outlets and the fender mounted gas cap (which I will mourn). To me the architecture of the car is remarkably close to the concept. I think the trunk looks longer because there is no spoiler on the pre-production car leaving a larger flat horizontal surface. Also all of pre-production & spy photos combined don't have a fraction of the effort, lenses, lighting, processing and compostion put into any one of the photos of the concept. When real photogs get real access to real 5th gens I'm bettin' we'll see stuff that will blow our socks off.
Or I could be wrong. Can't wait to find out.
__________________
1997 Camaro Z-28 Black. M6, Hurst Comp+, CAGS bypass, 3.42, TA cover/stud kit, SLP CAI, 1LE elbow, TB airfoil, LT4 KM, 1LE D/S & stabilizer bars, SLP sfcs, 17x9 SS/ZR-1 BFG 275/40-17 G-Force Sport.
|
|
|
02-20-2008, 09:27 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeuceGI
I guess I don't see much of a difference at all apart from minor details such as the marker lights, exhaust outlets and the fender mounted gas cap (which I will mourn). To me the architecture of the car is remarkably close to the concept. I think the trunk looks longer because there is no spoiler on the pre-production car leaving a larger flat horizontal surface. Also all of pre-production & spy photos combined don't have a fraction of the effort, lenses, lighting, processing and compostion put into any one of the photos of the concept. When real photogs get real access to real 5th gens I'm bettin' we'll see stuff that will blow our socks off.
Or I could be wrong. Can't wait to find out.
|
i do applaud gm for keeping their promise as far as staying true the concept.  i did't think of the process for the concept over the pre-production model ...  ... i'm just wishing it turns out better than the stang which shouldn't be hard. but other than that i hope there are some decent aftermarket parts for it, and a good looking V6 if the Z/28 is out of my price range.
__________________
"We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools."
"Faith is taking the first step, even when you don't see the whole staircase."
*Martin Luther King Jr.*
|
|
|
02-21-2008, 12:27 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 802
|
There are slight differences - but nothing drastic, imo. And when you consider how pretty much every other car went from concept to production - the Camaro Team has done an OUTSTANDING job...but slap on a spoiler, and the concept's paintjob...and I'd bet 1,000,000 dollars, that the 'WTF' would change to at least a 'okay'.
And truth be told, I honestly like the new rear a little better. that flare they've added for bumper standards actually looks good to me......
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CR97WS6
If you want to buy something else then do it, but you'll be jealous when that 5th gen passes your @ss and all you can do is drool!
|
.................................................. ..........................................
"Keep the Faith."
|
|
|
02-21-2008, 08:36 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 1,093
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye
And truth be told, I honestly like the new rear a little better. that flare they've added for bumper standards actually looks good to me......
|
I like the pre-pro rear quite a bit more than the concept. Less flat, more character.
|
|
|
02-22-2008, 09:45 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 63
|
It's funny this was brought up. This is the ONLY aspect of the pre-prod exterior i'm not thrilled with. I don't care for the extra line at the bottom of the bumper. I'm hoping that piece may be different depending on whether it's v6 vs v8, though I'm not holding my breath. The back of the concept was absolute perfection for me. All in all, this is a small thing considering how well they pegged it elsewhere, but it's worth mentioning.
|
|
|
02-22-2008, 11:09 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SE MI
Posts: 976
|
After fondling every square inch of the concept Camaro the last couple years from our personal memory bank, it's not hard to understand how every deviation from the concept to the pre-production car is large in our eyes.
__________________
Was TA Jack
2008 black Mustang GT Bullitt
2007 Silverado Classic 2500 CCLB LT3 Dmax/Ally
2007 Pontiac Grand Prix
|
|
|
02-22-2008, 11:11 AM
|
#8
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 290
|
The tail is definitely more busier on the pre-prod.
|
|
|
02-22-2008, 01:49 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 54
|
both nice cars. spoiler is a must and the tail lights being indented is really cool. Add the chevy boe tie and it close enough for me while still be pre production. I am sure the mass production model will be different too.
|
|
|
02-23-2008, 10:19 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,066
|
I agree with the first post x10
|
|
|
02-25-2008, 10:50 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 131
|
I hate the bulging door handle and the oversize fin antenna, the concept looked better.
|
|
|
03-13-2008, 07:45 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Annapolis MD
Posts: 2,457
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackMac8
|
Is the afterburner gone? It really grew on me after scotts comment on them.
__________________
perception is reality
|
|
|
03-13-2008, 08:45 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mack and Bewick
Posts: 1,606
|
The location of the reverse lights is awful. I also don't like the second bumper above the plate. The G35 is almost totally smooth so I don't see why Camaro has to have that?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mighty
No. I didn't read what he posted. I didn't read what you posted, either. I just like to randomly quote people and give some sort of inane comment in the hopes that we may be discussing the same topic.
|
http://smiliesftw.com/x/inoutrun.gif
|
|
|
03-13-2008, 10:22 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: northeast Miss.
Posts: 2,580
|
You gotta be freaking kidding me! A photochop of the pre production as the comparison against professionally shot pics of the concept?
__________________
1995 Lexus ES300, 1997 Black Z28 M6, 1999 Black Z28 A4
|
|
|
03-14-2008, 12:34 AM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,508
|
Said this in another thread, but the chrome around the taillights is much more blatant on the pre-pro model. Not sure why this is because the rest of the car is chrome-free.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.
|