Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

V8, far from dead at GM.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2008, 11:49 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
V8, far from dead at GM.....

V8 Engine Is Far From Dead at GM
Date posted: 01-22-2008


DETROIT — Afficionados of the grand ol' American V8 moaned when news came last month that General Motors killed an ambitious program that was well on its way to developing a sophisticated, all-new DOHC V8 architecture. The so-called "Ultra" V8, or UV8 in GM parlance, was to replace the aging Northstar in a variety of GM premium cars, but was mainly earmarked for Cadillac.

Yeah, the UV8 program is shelved, Tom Stephens, GM's group vice president for global powertrain and quality, told Inside Line at the recent Detroit auto show — but he says don't be in a hurry to write any obituaries for the V8 at GM.

First, the ubiquitous small-block V8 architecture remains for any number of applications, including the Corvette, obviously, and Cadillac's high-power V-Series models. GM will go out of business — or be taken over by Greenpeace — before it ever kills its historic small-block V8 architecture.

Second, although in the decision to shelve the UV8, Stephens says, "I think we did the right thing for this moment in time," the UV8 development is "wrapped up with a bow," and the program could be revisited in the future, if market conditions warrant.

In fact, Stephens teased us by saying the UV8 is "as refined as anything in the history of internal-combustion engines. It was the quietest engine we've ever tested."

He also says that while it has been assumed the long-in-the-tooth Northstar V8 would be discontinued by around 2010-'11, "you'll have to wait and see," regarding the ultimate fate of the V8 that has been in production since being introduced in the '93 Allante roadster. The insinuation is clear: Keeping the old Northstar around longer than planned now may be an option for premium-car customers who still insist on seeing a V8 when they lift the hood.

But Stephens says GM already has observed a change in consumers' engine preferences: At the Cadillac division, 85 percent of buyers for the SRX crossover and STS luxury sedan are opting for the 3.6-liter DOHC V6 instead of the Northstar 4.6-liter V8. GM Chief Executive Rick Wagoner recently said buyers of Chevrolet's hot new Malibu midsize sedan also are opting more for the car's base four-cylinder engine than GM planners anticipated.

What this means to you: Fantasize about what might have been with GM's now-discontinued premium V8, but take heart in the knowledge the great small-block V8 remains — including for the all-new Camaro. — Bill Visnic, Correspondent

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=124444
Z284ever is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 12:22 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Z28Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 6,166
Good stuff. I like the part about being taken over by Greenpeace before the small block ever goes away.

MAN it woulda been sweet to see what the UV8 program turned out.
Z28Wilson is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 02:53 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
97z28/m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: oshawa,ontario,canada
Posts: 3,597
sounds like they cheapened out.
97z28/m6 is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 03:00 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
DvBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 940
So they will give-up up-to 15% of their buyer base to save the money in development costs? Not my way of doing things, but i suppose there is always European V8's, or the trusty LSx.
DvBoard is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 03:17 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
soul strife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North of Cincy
Posts: 824
I think the V8 is a hard sell it tops the V6 by only 18hp. V8=320 15/24, V6=302 17/26
soul strife is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 03:38 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Z28Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 6,166
Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
sounds like they cheapened out.
One man's "cheaped out" is another man's "good business". Why waste development money on an engine architecture that may be made obsolete by CAFE?

The choice seems pretty clear -- if CAFE will dictate that only premium vehicles will have V8 options, why would you develop two distinct V8 lines? Put all of your V8 development money in your tried-and-true architecture and in making it more fuel efficient.
Z28Wilson is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 03:44 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
97z28/m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: oshawa,ontario,canada
Posts: 3,597
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
One man's "cheaped out" is another man's "good business". Why waste development money on an engine architecture that may be made obsolete by CAFE?

The choice seems pretty clear -- if CAFE will dictate that only premium vehicles will have V8 options, why would you develop two distinct V8 lines? Put all of your V8 development money in your tried-and-true architecture and in making it more fuel efficient.
but they are still going to build the engine it was to replace.
97z28/m6 is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 03:46 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
97z28/m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: oshawa,ontario,canada
Posts: 3,597
Originally Posted by soul strife
I think the V8 is a hard sell it tops the V6 by only 18hp. V8=320 15/24, V6=302 17/26
yup. which is why they need a newer version.
97z28/m6 is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 03:52 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
rlchv70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 681
I would think that we will find some (all?) of the UV8s refinements in the Gen V LSx engines, including DOHC on some versions.
rlchv70 is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 04:04 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Z28Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 6,166
Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
but they are still going to build the engine it was to replace.
Sure. But they aren't putting more money into it, are they? The article hints that the Northstar will only continue on as long as CAFE will allow it to. That would make sense.

Originally Posted by rlchv70
I would think that we will find some (all?) of the UV8s refinements in the Gen V LSx engines, including DOHC on some versions.
Exactly. And I'm sure you're still saving money by carrying on with one future V8 family in different configurations than two distinct programs. To me, this is just further consolidation, much like GM Powertrain consolidating all of its operations in the 70's/80's, when each division no longer had its own unique engines.

Last edited by Z28Wilson; 01-23-2008 at 04:07 PM.
Z28Wilson is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 05:46 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
nightwave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: S. Indiana, USA
Posts: 123
Originally Posted by rlchv70
I would think that we will find some (all?) of the UV8s refinements in the Gen V LSx engines, including DOHC on some versions.
Personally, I'd look for some of the UV8's refinements to go on the Northstar. That would make sense, since they're limiting developments to current V8 families. Just pure guessing, but I'd expect the Northstar to get a bump sometime in the near future.
nightwave is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 06:17 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
DvBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 940
Originally Posted by soul strife
I think the V8 is a hard sell it tops the V6 by only 18hp. V8=320 15/24, V6=302 17/26
I figured 400hp easy, whoops. Sounds like the V8 needs a lot of work! Not less .
DvBoard is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 06:18 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
First its doom and gloom because GM is dropping all V8s.

What's that? Only the Ultra-V8 program is being put on hitaus?

Now its doom and gloom because GM is trying to cut costs by maintaining the LSx V8 program.

Does anyone else see the irony in this logic?
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 06:19 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
99SilverSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,463
I think we all knew GM wasn't dropping V8's. The Northstar replacement is a setback for Caddy. We'll have to see of CAFE is dealt with by M-B and BMW. But more money for the LS engines is better for all of us. DOHC still on the table?
With the dual system hybrids in the full size trucks there is a potential to place them in passenger cars like Camaro, Vette and Caddy's.
99SilverSS is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 07:15 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
mastrdrver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: O-Town
Posts: 1,817
I still fail to see why GM would pour all that money into a new engine just to kill it before it hits production. Seems like a huge waste of financial resources to me. Even if it was killed because of CAFE, just put it in high dollar low volume cars to keep it from effecting GM's CAFE number so much.
mastrdrver is offline  


Quick Reply: V8, far from dead at GM.....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31 AM.