

|
|
View Poll Results: What V6 would you like to see in the Camaro?
|
|
3.6L DOHC
|
  
|
57 |
74.03% |
|
3.9 L
|
  
|
20 |
25.97% |
03-19-2007, 07:41 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,754
|
V6 Prefrence
3.6L DOHC or 3.9L--which holds the most appeal in a V6 Camaro. Yeah I know, most want the V8 versions but I beleive the V6 deserves to be done well and done right. Not some POS like V6 Stang with its monter truck 225/65/16 tires and marsh mellow suspension...ect Opps sry for my rant
__________________
89 Formula 350
SDPC Vortec TPI Intake, Edlebrock E-Tec 170 heads, ZZ9 cam, 1.6 Crane Gold RR, SLP 1 3/4 headers, SLP runners, Tuner Pro R/T Software
B&M 2400rpm stall ect
2007 Cobalt 2.4 SS auto sedan
|
|
|
03-19-2007, 08:53 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,200
|
3.6L DOHC with direct injection. 300 HP sounds nice.
__________________
1998 Camaro 3.8L M5 - Some bolt-ons, !Rear seats, '93-96 tail light conversion
15.269@90.84 MPH
2009 Malibu LS
2010 Camaro SS/RS M6
|
|
|
03-19-2007, 09:18 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3
|
none
|
|
|
03-20-2007, 01:00 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Inbound for H-Town!
Posts: 3,420
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skorpion317
3.6L DOHC with direct injection. 300 HP sounds nice.
|
I agree!
3.6L FTW
|
|
|
03-20-2007, 01:54 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 4,246
|
3.6 by far. 3.9 is slowly fading away into nothingness.
G6, Uplander and Impala will be the only cars that use the 3.9
Aura, Malibu, G8, CTS, Lambda and Upper level G6 all use the new 3.6. The Vue, Nox and Torrent also use the 3.6.
Time to let it go, 3.6 in either a higher output 275 like the Lambda, or around 300 with DI in the CTS, but I would like to see the power around the 280-300hp range.
__________________
2009 Malibu LT 2.4: My NEW Ride! Yeah...no Camaro...I know I know...
1987 Camaro Z28
1972 Camaro RS: It's easy being green
Mod @ GMInsidenews.com
|
|
|
03-20-2007, 07:29 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glock36
none
|
gee what a good answer
__________________
89 Formula 350
SDPC Vortec TPI Intake, Edlebrock E-Tec 170 heads, ZZ9 cam, 1.6 Crane Gold RR, SLP 1 3/4 headers, SLP runners, Tuner Pro R/T Software
B&M 2400rpm stall ect
2007 Cobalt 2.4 SS auto sedan
|
|
|
03-20-2007, 09:52 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Premium Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 12,357
|
Dare I say I would almost prefer a motor with a single overhead cam for simplicity sake when doing repairs? I remember when I used to have to work on the old 3.4 DOHC motors in the Monte Carlos and Grand Prixs and they were a real headache. That is what pops to mind when I see the option of a 3.6DOHC motor.
__________________
1997 Camaro Z-28
A4,3.23s,T-tops,Black,Leather
Pacesetter LTs,catted ORY,Magnaflow CB,Spohn suspension, NX dual nozzle w/ Gen X2 upgrade,Mad Z28 tune,Mallory 685
|
|
|
03-20-2007, 10:26 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 15,409
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Als Z
3.6 by far. 3.9 is slowly fading away into nothingness.
G6, Uplander and Impala will be the only cars that use the 3.9
Aura, Malibu, G8, CTS, Lambda and Upper level G6 all use the new 3.6. The Vue, Nox and Torrent also use the 3.6.
Time to let it go, 3.6 in either a higher output 275 like the Lambda, or around 300 with DI in the CTS, but I would like to see the power around the 280-300hp range.
|
I agree. 300-320 hp V6's will be common very soon. And GM is pushing to get more HFV6's out there.
__________________
Pony Car: an affordable, compact, highly styled car with a sporty or performance-oriented image.
Last edited by Z284ever; 03-20-2007 at 10:49 AM.
|
|
|
03-21-2007, 06:07 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 52
|
3.6L V6 all the way. If they play this right, GM could parlay the V6 Camaro as a stylish, more affordable 350Z or G35 alternative, as opposed to being just a Mustang competitor.
|
|
|
03-22-2007, 02:09 AM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Huntington, W.V. 25701
Posts: 641
|
re
A 5.3 should be base and probally better gas mileage and as cheap as the DOHC 6. But for insurance maybe they have to have a 6 option.
__________________
94 Formula A4,All forged bottom-end Vortech S-trim. Mac Headers,Vigilante Stall
1.57 60 1/8 7.30 1/4 11.35@ 121.xx with Now tuned by Bluecat! Meow!
|
|
|
03-29-2007, 12:01 AM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 4,246
|
You cannot have a base V8 engine. Not everyone wants a V8 engine.
I think that the 3.6 could offer a great balance of good power for the car without getting crazy. Still would offer a great sports car experiance.
That said, I think that if the 3.6 does come in at 300hp, I dont see the need for a base V8?
__________________
2009 Malibu LT 2.4: My NEW Ride! Yeah...no Camaro...I know I know...
1987 Camaro Z28
1972 Camaro RS: It's easy being green
Mod @ GMInsidenews.com
|
|
|
03-29-2007, 01:55 AM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,027
|
For a car in this type of marketing slot, I would think that whatever GM is offering as the "HF" V6 in other cars would be used as the base engine in Camaro. I see very little point of a sportscar with a "HV" V6.
__________________
2006 GTO
1998 Z/28 TSP Lid, no Flippin traction at all - 13.49@106 *SOLD*
1994 Z/28 14.06@100 - Totalled, 8-25-02.
|
|
|
04-01-2007, 10:51 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 479
|
I beleive the base should be a v-8. I dont see why people get 'sports' cars that have a little ole v-6 in them.
__________________
96 Camaro Z28, 355 LT1, Summit 58mm Throttle Body, CC306 cam, 1.6 S/A Rockers, Hardend push rods, Beehive 918 Springs, High flow oil pump, Accel Opti, Accel 30# Injectors, Accel afpr, Accel Coil, MadZ28 tune, T-tops, 6 Speed, Slp CIA, Pacesetter Long tubes, X-pipe, Dynomax Bullets.
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 03:35 AM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 4,246
|
Not everyone wants a V8. Not everyone wants or needs 400hp+
Its tough to sell 100k units with a V8 only.
V6 will appeal to a much broader audiance then an all V8 set up would...but I got a feeling that you would settle for a revised 4th gen.
__________________
2009 Malibu LT 2.4: My NEW Ride! Yeah...no Camaro...I know I know...
1987 Camaro Z28
1972 Camaro RS: It's easy being green
Mod @ GMInsidenews.com
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 07:26 AM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,754
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 96ZCamaro
I beleive the base should be a v-8. I dont see why people get 'sports' cars that have a little ole v-6 in them.
|
I don't see why you can't see the need for a V6. Lutz wants this puppy to sell!
And like has been said before it needs to appeal to a wide range of buyers.
Whats the production target over 125K per year? Check out production stats for all the years of Camaros ever made. They sold tons of V6 cars.
Some V6 buyers might step up to the V8 but I think most would not. Cost is a big factor. You may not see why people buy V6 cars--but its a nesseicity to have it!
__________________
89 Formula 350
SDPC Vortec TPI Intake, Edlebrock E-Tec 170 heads, ZZ9 cam, 1.6 Crane Gold RR, SLP 1 3/4 headers, SLP runners, Tuner Pro R/T Software
B&M 2400rpm stall ect
2007 Cobalt 2.4 SS auto sedan
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM.
|