Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

anyone see that lexus commercial with auto parrallel parking???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 01:31 AM
  #1  
Klypto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,418
From: New Orleans, LA
anyone see that lexus commercial with auto parrallel parking???

wow... really good layout lol...

but DAYAM haha, thats great...

cory
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 06:53 PM
  #2  
danno02SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
From: Pasadena,CA,USA
???? ????

Sad to say but there is a market for such a thing.

Prediction: Look for this option to be selected by women at a 7 to 3 ratio over men.

Prediction 2: Look for a Lexus recall within a year after some moron tries to auto-parallel on an incline in icy conditions and subsequently wins their uber $$ whiplash law-suit. It's impossible to account for the human factor even in the most complex of failure modes analysis. That's primarily why we don't have cars driving themselves yet.
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 07:09 PM
  #3  
Klypto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,418
From: New Orleans, LA
Originally Posted by danno02SS
???? ????

That's primarily why we don't have cars driving themselves yet.
but going 2-5mph? i dont think you give technology enough credit...

i dunno
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 07:20 PM
  #4  
2001NBMZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,655
From: Jacksonville, FL
Saw the commercial, didn't think it could actually be real?
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 07:40 PM
  #5  
Klypto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,418
From: New Orleans, LA
easily... i watch history/discovery all the time heh... like 3 yrs ago i saw how they already have the technology to put cars on the street hwy controlled my comps... but not public friendly/practical yet...

can easily see them taming it/simular technology to go parallel...
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 12:42 AM
  #6  
danno02SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
From: Pasadena,CA,USA
Originally Posted by Klypto
but going 2-5mph? i dont think you give technology enough credit...

i dunno
It's not the technology I have a problem with, it's the people using it. Even though parallel parking is a relatively easy task to automate, I'm pretty sure someone is going to find a way to defeat the fault protection in that system. Making something idiot proof is almost impossible.

Case in point, I just got a new cell. Here is one of the warnings in the "use and care" instructions:
"Don't try to dry your phone in a microwave oven"

You know someone had to try that for the manufacturer to even mention it. You can't simulate how some people think.
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 01:25 AM
  #7  
Klypto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,418
From: New Orleans, LA
Originally Posted by danno02SS
You can't simulate how some people think.
true... no matter how stupid you think people are, and you come up with everying... there is always someone that surpases pure stupidity heh..

but i still think its pimp

cory
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 08:26 AM
  #8  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
If you can't parallel park...cut up your driving license....you don't deserve it.

This kind of thing is a liability lawyers dream.
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 08:43 AM
  #9  
shock6906's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,577
From: Sandy VJJville
I agree, it just goes to show that there are too many people out there that don't know how to drive. I think that retests should be mandatory at certain intervals. I know I won't have to take my driving test again in at least 10 years and it's already been 5 since I started. Not only that, if I don't let my license expire 10 years from now, I can just apply for a renewal online and I'll never have to step foot in the DMV. Who knows how bad my driving skills my have degraded in that amount of time.
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 09:08 AM
  #10  
JG/70Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 323
From: SK, Canada
Originally Posted by danno02SS
It's not the technology I have a problem with, it's the people using it. Even though parallel parking is a relatively easy task to automate, I'm pretty sure someone is going to find a way to defeat the fault protection in that system. Making something idiot proof is almost impossible.

Case in point, I just got a new cell. Here is one of the warnings in the "use and care" instructions:
"Don't try to dry your phone in a microwave oven"

You know someone had to try that for the manufacturer to even mention it. You can't simulate how some people think.
*runs to microwave*
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 03:23 PM
  #11  
AnthonyHSV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 848
From: Melb, Aust
Originally Posted by danno02SS
You can't simulate how some people think.
Haha mate try and work in IT. People's brain seem to stop, soon as they turn a PC on.
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #12  
Caps94ZODG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,748
From: New England
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
If you can't parallel park...cut up your driving license....you don't deserve it.

This kind of thing is a liability lawyers dream.
sad thing is some states you dont even need to the city's are not set up for it...

found that out right quick when I came home to Boston and was out of practice Iwas like WTF???? 2 years and I was having trouble parking like I used to..its funny how fast you forget to do womething if you havnt practiced it all the time..
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 03:42 PM
  #13  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
I work for a transit agency that drives our trains entirely by computer. You need to give the technology a chance.
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 04:08 PM
  #14  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Originally Posted by jg95z28
I work for a transit agency that drives our trains entirely by computer. You need to give the technology a chance.
trains are a little different.
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 04:39 PM
  #15  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
trains are a little different.
True. However I'd be a little more concerned about a train barreling down on me at 80+ mph than a Lexus. Wouldn't you?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.