Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2007 Tahoe PPV (Police Pursuit Vehicle) is a Impressive Performer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 07:01 PM
  #1  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
2007 Tahoe PPV (Police Pursuit Vehicle) is a Impressive Performer



It looks like the 2007 Tahoe police pkg. is a pretty impressive performer considering its an full-size SUV. The annual Michigan State Police test recently conducted tests on all 2007 model police pkg. and special service pkg. vehicles.

In acceleration and tests the 2007 Tahoe PPV faster than everything except for the Hemi powered Charger and Magnum, and topped out at 137 mph which was a higher top speed than the Hemi powered Magnum attained which was 131 mph.
In braking again the Tahoe PPV at 138 ft outbraked everything from 60 to 0 except for the Charger and Magnum which both took 132 ft to stop.





0-20 MPH (Sec)
0-30 MPH (Sec)
0-40 MPH (Sec)
0-50 MPH (Sec)
0-60 MPH (Sec)
0-70 MPH (Sec)
0-80 MPH (Sec)
0-90 MPH (Sec)
0-100 MPH (Sec)
TOP SPEED

Chevrolet Tahoe PPV E85 5.3L SPFI
2.04
3.26
4.52
6.34
8.49
10.74
13.85
18.40
23.45
137

Dodge Charger 5.7L SPFI
1.57
2.57
3.57
4.97
6.53
8.24
10.69
13.36
16.32
148

Dodge Magnum 5.7L SPFI
1.55
2.56
3.57
5.01
6.54
8.30
10.81
13.48
16.53
131

Chevrolet Impala 9C1 3.9L SPFI
1.95
3.21
4.56
6.36
8.82
11.35
14.21
18.26
24.11
139

Ford Police Interceptor 3.27 axle 4.6L SPFI
1.81
3.11
4.48
6.43
8.71
11.16
14.19
18.74
24.01
130

Ford Police Interceptor 3.55 axle 4.6L SPFI
1.84
3.10
4.52
6.55
8.72
11.14
14.42
18.83
24.01
119

Road Course Average Lap Time

Dodge Magnum 1:37.65
Dodge Charger 1:37.69
Impala 9C1 1:42.95
Tahoe PPV 1:43.78
Ford Police Interceptor 3.27 1:41.00
Ford Police Interceptor 3.55 1:40.91


I tried to copy and paste it all together but the word document just doesn't work with the message board.

Last edited by 30thZ286speed; Oct 31, 2006 at 08:36 PM.
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 07:29 PM
  #2  
FS3800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,028
From: Chicago, IL
this should make it a little easier to compare:
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 07:42 PM
  #3  
blackrat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 587
From: Bay Area, CA
why is the more aggresively geared ford slower in every acceleration comparo? the only thing it did better was getting around the track.
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 09:40 PM
  #4  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
too bad Chevy won't offer the V8 with the impala's 9C1 package

A 6.0L in the Tahoe would be quite mean as well.
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 09:50 PM
  #5  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Do they have MPG figures too?
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 06:18 AM
  #6  
ProudPony's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,180
From: Yadkinville, NC USA
Originally Posted by blackrat
why is the more aggresively geared ford slower in every acceleration comparo? the only thing it did better was getting around the track.
EXACTLY! Somethings way goofy there.
The 3.55's should have shaved time off the accel times if it did nothing else.
Maybe they had ASW tires on one and performance tires on the other?

Also wonder what happened with the Impala that gave it a "jump" between 80 and 100?
It was slower by .36 at 80, faster by .14 at 90, then way slower by .66 at 100?
Sloppy shift at the top end maybe? Hmmm...

Last edited by ProudPony; Nov 1, 2006 at 06:27 AM.
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 09:41 AM
  #7  
slt's Avatar
slt
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,024
Originally Posted by 30thZ286speed
Road Course Average Lap Time
Dodge Charger 1:37.69
Tahoe PPV 1:43.78
Thats kinda funny. 5 seconds is a pretty big difference, but still, its a Charger vs a full size SUV.
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 10:41 AM
  #8  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Tahoe looks cool with those black steelies and aggressive rubber.
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 11:01 AM
  #9  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
Its a shame they couldnt get the V8 in the Impy
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 10:15 PM
  #10  
Caps94ZODG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,748
From: New England
that big white wrapper just begs for some police grafix..
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 10:46 PM
  #11  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
Originally Posted by ProudPony
EXACTLY! Somethings way goofy there.
The 3.55's should have shaved time off the accel times if it did nothing else.
Maybe they had ASW tires on one and performance tires on the other?

Also wonder what happened with the Impala that gave it a "jump" between 80 and 100?
It was slower by .36 at 80, faster by .14 at 90, then way slower by .66 at 100?
Sloppy shift at the top end maybe? Hmmm...

These are the preliminary results from there testing in September, the full report isn't ready yet, which may shed some light on the odd #s. I always take there test results with a grain of salt, real world #s on these cars are always somewhat faster.

In years past the 3.55 has been around half a second faster than the 3.27 Interceptor. I really don't understand the 3.55 option, there is not much difference in the performance, and with the handicap of only topping out at 119 mph really negates the option. For the life of me I can't figure out why Ford won't equip a high speed balanced driveshaft so the 3.55 car can acheive a higher top speed, or further more why not drop a 3V 4.6 in it.

As far as acceleration on the Crown Vic vs the Impala, our '06 Impalas will pull away from the Crown Vic as the speeds get higher, and then at around 120-125 mph its like the Crown Vic stops accelerating, and the Impalas continue to pull away to around 140 mph.

Last edited by 30thZ286speed; Nov 1, 2006 at 10:51 PM.
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 11:23 PM
  #12  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Why don't they offer the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 and the Trailblazer SS?
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 11:37 PM
  #13  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
Originally Posted by number77
Why don't they offer the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT-8 and the Trailblazer SS?

Price would be the main reason, most govt. agencies would not be able to afford them in quantities. For instance the Impala 9C1 is a little over $18K, the Ford Police Interceptor (Crown Vic) is a little over $21K under govt. contract price. I think the Tahoe PPV starts around $25-26K, which is around the same price as the Charger Police Pkg.

Last edited by 30thZ286speed; Nov 1, 2006 at 11:39 PM.
Old Nov 2, 2006 | 07:55 AM
  #14  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
the Impala 9C1 is screaming for that 5.3L.
Old Nov 2, 2006 | 02:29 PM
  #15  
NewbieWar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,370
From: Germany
Originally Posted by 30thZ286speed
Price would be the main reason, most govt. agencies would not be able to afford them in quantities. For instance the Impala 9C1 is a little over $18K, the Ford Police Interceptor (Crown Vic) is a little over $21K under govt. contract price. I think the Tahoe PPV starts around $25-26K, which is around the same price as the Charger Police Pkg.

yea but a Trailblazer SS is no more expensive then a base tahoe... expecially if you removed all the leather and stuff that the trailblazer comes standard with...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 AM.