Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
A move to further bring the brand upscale and increase distance between Honda price points.
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl.../60501001/1041
Moving Upscale
Acura decides to kill the RSX coupe as it moves to separate from Honda brand
By KATHY JACKSON | AUTOMOTIVE NEWS
AutoWeek | Published 05/01/06, 7:46 am et
LOS ANGELES -- Acura will kill the RSX coupe at the end of the 2006 model year.
John Mendel, senior vice president of automobile operations at American Honda Motor Co., says the company is considering replacements for its cheapest vehicle but would not elaborate. Some dealers say Acura will add a coupe version of the TSX.
Elimination of the RSX, Acura's least expensive vehicle by about $8,000, looks like part of Acura's long-term plan to move upscale and separate from sibling brand Honda.
Consumers can now buy a 197-hp Honda Civic Si for about the same price as a base 155-hp RSX.
"The Acura brand has been inconsistent," Mendel said during an interview with Automotive News. "We want to be performance, luxury and technology -- in the BMW area a little bit."
This summer Acura will introduce the small RDX all-wheel-drive crossover, Acura's first vehicle with a turbocharged engine. A redesigned MDX SUV goes on sale this fall with a V-6 engine that Acura promises will deliver more horsepower than any other vehicle in its class.
The base RSX, on the other hand, is powered by a 2.0-liter inline four-cylinder engine making 155 hp. It is priced at $20,940, including the $615 destination charge.
By comparison, the Civic Si is powered by a 2.0-liter inline four-cylinder engine making 197 hp and teamed with a six-speed manual transmission. It sells for $20,840, including shipping.
The RSX was introduced in 2002 and freshened in the 2004 model year. U.S. sales fell 10.6 percent the first three months of this year, to 4,150 units.
By comparison, Acura's best seller, the TL, posted sales of 16,804 in the same period.
Guido Vildozo, automotive analyst with Global Insight in Lexington, Mass., says the RSX needs to go if Acura wants to distance itself from Honda and move upscale. "Where do you position RSX now that Honda has the Civic Si?" Vildozo asks.
Rob Mohr, sales manager for 20 years at Montano Acura in Albuquerque, N.M., says dealers have heard that Acura may add both coupe and convertible models to the TSX sedan, the second-least expensive Acura, which lists at $28,505, including shipping.
But Mohr questions the brand's decision to kill the RSX. He says the inexpensive sticker brought in a lot of customers.
"It's a mistake," he says. "It's a great first car for Acura. We had our chance at the luxury market and blew it. Now we're going to lose a lot of the RSX customers, and I'm not so sure we can get them back."
The RSX is the successor to the Integra, an Acura mainstay in the past. In 1995, for instance, the Integra posted U.S. sales of 61,316.
The Integra outsold the Acura Legend by more than 3-to-1 and accounted for 63.1 percent of Acura sales.
Acura already has learned some lessons about high price tags. The redesigned RL flagship sedan arrived in the fall of 2004 loaded with such equipment as all-wheel drive and a navigation system. The sticker is just shy of $50,000.
But sales are down by more than a third this year. So Mendel says the company will bring out a trim line this summer that will give customers more flexibility with options. He says the vehicle will be priced more in the mid-luxury range.
Acura decides to kill the RSX coupe as it moves to separate from Honda brand
By KATHY JACKSON | AUTOMOTIVE NEWS
AutoWeek | Published 05/01/06, 7:46 am et
LOS ANGELES -- Acura will kill the RSX coupe at the end of the 2006 model year.
John Mendel, senior vice president of automobile operations at American Honda Motor Co., says the company is considering replacements for its cheapest vehicle but would not elaborate. Some dealers say Acura will add a coupe version of the TSX.
Elimination of the RSX, Acura's least expensive vehicle by about $8,000, looks like part of Acura's long-term plan to move upscale and separate from sibling brand Honda.
Consumers can now buy a 197-hp Honda Civic Si for about the same price as a base 155-hp RSX.
"The Acura brand has been inconsistent," Mendel said during an interview with Automotive News. "We want to be performance, luxury and technology -- in the BMW area a little bit."
This summer Acura will introduce the small RDX all-wheel-drive crossover, Acura's first vehicle with a turbocharged engine. A redesigned MDX SUV goes on sale this fall with a V-6 engine that Acura promises will deliver more horsepower than any other vehicle in its class.
The base RSX, on the other hand, is powered by a 2.0-liter inline four-cylinder engine making 155 hp. It is priced at $20,940, including the $615 destination charge.
By comparison, the Civic Si is powered by a 2.0-liter inline four-cylinder engine making 197 hp and teamed with a six-speed manual transmission. It sells for $20,840, including shipping.
The RSX was introduced in 2002 and freshened in the 2004 model year. U.S. sales fell 10.6 percent the first three months of this year, to 4,150 units.
By comparison, Acura's best seller, the TL, posted sales of 16,804 in the same period.
Guido Vildozo, automotive analyst with Global Insight in Lexington, Mass., says the RSX needs to go if Acura wants to distance itself from Honda and move upscale. "Where do you position RSX now that Honda has the Civic Si?" Vildozo asks.
Rob Mohr, sales manager for 20 years at Montano Acura in Albuquerque, N.M., says dealers have heard that Acura may add both coupe and convertible models to the TSX sedan, the second-least expensive Acura, which lists at $28,505, including shipping.
But Mohr questions the brand's decision to kill the RSX. He says the inexpensive sticker brought in a lot of customers.
"It's a mistake," he says. "It's a great first car for Acura. We had our chance at the luxury market and blew it. Now we're going to lose a lot of the RSX customers, and I'm not so sure we can get them back."
The RSX is the successor to the Integra, an Acura mainstay in the past. In 1995, for instance, the Integra posted U.S. sales of 61,316.
The Integra outsold the Acura Legend by more than 3-to-1 and accounted for 63.1 percent of Acura sales.
Acura already has learned some lessons about high price tags. The redesigned RL flagship sedan arrived in the fall of 2004 loaded with such equipment as all-wheel drive and a navigation system. The sticker is just shy of $50,000.
But sales are down by more than a third this year. So Mendel says the company will bring out a trim line this summer that will give customers more flexibility with options. He says the vehicle will be priced more in the mid-luxury range.
Re: Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
The simple fact is that it just wasn't selling well enough, was dragging the brand's image a bit downscale, and they just decided the right time to axe it is when the Civic moved on to its next generation.
The RSX looks bad next to the current Civic because the RSX is based off the old Civic, and IMO you'd be pretty crazy to pay for the old-gen RSX when the new gen Civic is superior in almost every way (save for the name on the front and the service/warranty associated with that) and costs more.
The RSX looks bad next to the current Civic because the RSX is based off the old Civic, and IMO you'd be pretty crazy to pay for the old-gen RSX when the new gen Civic is superior in almost every way (save for the name on the front and the service/warranty associated with that) and costs more.
Re: Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
Does this mean the Prelude can come back?
They'll most likely keep it that way.
Re: Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
I wonder if Acura will be abandoning the coupe market all together. I hope they're not expecting the TSX to take up the slack and be the lone entry level vehicle.
Re: Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
Originally Posted by Sixer-Bird
I wonder if Acura will be abandoning the coupe market all together. I hope they're not expecting the TSX to take up the slack and be the lone entry level vehicle.
Cadillac and Lexus don't offer an entry level 2-door, or any entry level vehicle that starts any less $$... so I don't see where they don't have their bases covered except maybe the entry level 2-door, but as evidenced by the RSX... it just never sold that well.
Re: Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
Originally Posted by unvc92camarors
I don't see the link between a dying 2 door sports coupe and a bulky AWD crossover if you ask me...
Re: Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
Originally Posted by Threxx
They only mentioned it because the article is giving a snapshot of all the other changes going on in the Acura lineup currently. The RDX now shares the new entry level spot in Acura's lineup with the TSX. Of further interest, the RDX is based on the new Civic chassis/platform, albeit lux'd-out and with a significnatly more powerful motor.
Re: Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
Originally Posted by Threxx
The RSX looks bad next to the current Civic because the RSX is based off the old Civic, and IMO you'd be pretty crazy to pay for the old-gen RSX when the new gen Civic is superior in almost every way (save for the name on the front and the service/warranty associated with that) and costs more.
Re: Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
Originally Posted by 90 Z28SS
Different strokes I guess . I would take a Type-S current gen RSX any day of the week over a new Si . Its the SI that was brought up to Type-S standards as far as handling , engine ect. The SI benefits the better structure , but its wierd styling and down right goofey and awkward interior are things I couldnt get over . The tired RSX still shines imo amongst the current compact cars 

So if the subjectives of each car sway against those objectives, then, well, nobody can argue with that.
But from a technical standpoint if the RSX was moved to the new platform it would benefit noticably.
Re: Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
The whole brand is
to me.
The new RL is nice looking, but I dont see anyone paying that much for it even with its super duper all wheel drive. Especially since its not that much bigger than the Accord.
The best thing about that brand is the styling to me.
But then again now they are making the Honda's look like Acuras...
to me.The new RL is nice looking, but I dont see anyone paying that much for it even with its super duper all wheel drive. Especially since its not that much bigger than the Accord.
The best thing about that brand is the styling to me.
But then again now they are making the Honda's look like Acuras...
Re: Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
Originally Posted by Good Ph.D
The whole brand is
to me.
The new RL is nice looking, but I dont see anyone paying that much for it even with its super duper all wheel drive. Especially since its not that much bigger than the Accord.
The best thing about that brand is the styling to me.
But then again now they are making the Honda's look like Acuras...
to me.The new RL is nice looking, but I dont see anyone paying that much for it even with its super duper all wheel drive. Especially since its not that much bigger than the Accord.
The best thing about that brand is the styling to me.
But then again now they are making the Honda's look like Acuras...

With that said, the previous gen RL was definitely trailing in its class IMO.
Re: Acura RSX to be axed after '06MY
Originally Posted by Threxx
Have you ever sat in or driven the new RL? It's an amazing piece of engineering and is a relative bargain considering what it competes with. GS300, E-class, STS, etc... it offers a ton of standard features that the others charge an arm and a leg for. Of course if you don't want the features then the others might be a better deal since their base price starts out a tad lower. But seriously... I can't imagine anyone who has actually driven an RL even thinking of placing it along the same lines as the Accord.
With that said, the previous gen RL was definitely trailing in its class IMO.
With that said, the previous gen RL was definitely trailing in its class IMO.
My point was the brand lacks identity, which wasn't useful I suppose since that was the point of the article.





