

|
06-12-2002, 11:39 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Casselberry, Florida
Posts: 28
|
Need help solving a bet! What is faster stock down the track?
What is faster stock down the track? Would a stock 94 Z28 A4 be faster down the track than a stock 94 M6 z28?
__________________
94' White Z28
18" Zennetti Wheels
3.42s, LCA's, Lowered
99 yami R1
85/88 Black Mustang 5.0
|
|
|
06-13-2002, 05:11 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Orlando, Florida, USA
Posts: 2,305
|
I would think that the M6 "could" be faster with a good driver but the A4 would be easier more consistent and might be faster if the M6 driver didn't pull off perfect launch and shifts.
__________________
2002 SOM SS Vert M6:  *****345hp package, K&N, Predator, Mac mids w/ORY, FRA, BMR STB, DMS springs, DMS Adj PHB, ST 35mm Front Sway Bar, !*! Z06 brake upgrade  !*!  , And yes, I'm autocrossing it yet again. 
13.3 @ 106 stock! Convertibles are slow!
|
|
|
06-13-2002, 05:28 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 7,676
|
Depends on the launch. Stock for stock I think the M6 has an advantage, because they can "stall" the motor before they launch. Only so much you can do with the stock converter.
also is 94 the year with more for acceleration gear ratios on the M6 tranny, or was that only in I think 93s.
------------------
1994 Medium Quaser Blue Camaro 3.4L V6 w/ 5-speed
Homeade CAI with a huge K&N cylinder filter, Single outlet Flowmaster with resonator, Accel 8mm ignition wires, Splitfire plugs, 3.42 gears and posi off a 97 WS6, 1 piece steel driveshaft, Converted to 4-wheel disc brakes, 1LE transmision mount, 1LE sway bars, Prothane bushings and endlinks, BMR Strut tower brace, ASP underdrive pulleys
Lightest Weight W/out driver: 3160
15.696@86.22 with a 2.214 60'!
Best R/T .507
Best 60' 2.106
Father's Stock 2000 Navy Blue Camaro 3.8L V6 w/ 5-speed
15.875@88.25 With wheel spin in 1st
AIM: MustangEater82
__________________
-2007 Pontiac G6 Sedan (Former cars, '85, '94, '00 Camaros, '92 5.0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE1252's Keeper
Yes, and while I'm all for swallowing, I draw the line at yogurt flavored Pepsi. 
|
|
|
|
06-13-2002, 11:19 AM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Orlando, Fl, USA
Posts: 324
|
I would say that it's all dependant on the drivers. But if you have some top-notch drivers that can drive both cars to the limit i would say the M6 just because you can control the engine speed. Just my 2 cents...
------------------
~Wilson........
Smoked out Black 93 Z28
EGA behind passenger window...
Sleeping Midnight Blue 89 GSX-R 750
__________________
~Wilson........
**Sold**
Black 93 A4 Z28, 160 thermo, Airfoil & CAI
"Samantha"
'02 Maxima SE
Midnight Blue 89 GSX-R 750
Once a Marine, always a Marine...
|
|
|
06-13-2002, 01:39 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 7,676
|
Well M6 you also have the ability to power shift, and keep the revs up for a split second between shifts, and in my opinion you can shift faster in an M6 then in a stock auto.
------------------
1994 Medium Quaser Blue Camaro 3.4L V6 w/ 5-speed
Homeade CAI with a huge K&N cylinder filter, Single outlet Flowmaster with resonator, Accel 8mm ignition wires, Splitfire plugs, 3.42 gears and posi off a 97 WS6, 1 piece steel driveshaft, Converted to 4-wheel disc brakes, 1LE transmision mount, 1LE sway bars, Prothane bushings and endlinks, BMR Strut tower brace, ASP underdrive pulleys
Lightest Weight W/out driver: 3160
15.696@86.22 with a 2.214 60'!
Best R/T .507
Best 60' 2.106
Father's Stock 2000 Navy Blue Camaro 3.8L V6 w/ 5-speed
15.875@88.25 With wheel spin in 1st
AIM: MustangEater82
__________________
-2007 Pontiac G6 Sedan (Former cars, '85, '94, '00 Camaros, '92 5.0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE1252's Keeper
Yes, and while I'm all for swallowing, I draw the line at yogurt flavored Pepsi. 
|
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 12:18 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orlando,Fl
Posts: 4,091
|
It all comes down to the driver
__________________

AIM: NX LT1 Z28
CFFB #54 - '00 Maxima GLE D.D. - '94 Z28 A4 Not stock.
NITROUS!!! Is it in you... yet?
http://www.nitrousoutlet.com/
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 11:34 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 1,619
|
Assuming all things were equal from the factory (eninge HP and such), and discounting driver skill, traction, then I would figure the 6M to be quicker due to less HP lost through the drivetrain and the 3.42 gears versus the 3.23 for the auto and overall vehicle weight.
Now that is a lot to have happen. In the real world I would bet on the auto unless the driver of the 6-speed is very good.
Later ... Larry S.
------------------
'95 Trans Am - Powerdyne
11.874 @ 118.92 MPH
__________________
'95 Trans Am - Powerdyne
11.760 @ 118.96 MPH on Nitto DR's
429 RWHP & 440 RWTQ
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 01:29 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: oviedo
Posts: 326
|
Just a FYI.. There is NO WAY IN HELL that a 6 speed driver and "shift" faster than an A4.
Just no way.
I will also agree with the M6 being faster.. Put a stall converter on and its a different story.
__________________
2000 T/A M6
Intake
FTRA,Direct Flow(Fram),GMS MAF,Fernco 3x3 coupler, Ported Throttle Body, LS6 Intake.
Exhaust
MAC Headers w/offroad pipe, SLP Loudmouth
Engine
Stage 2 heads "JPR", MTI T1 Cam, ASP Pulley,
Suspension
BMR trak pak + relocation brackets, Eibach Lowering kit. BMR K Member
Misc.
B&M ripper, HPP3 (6600 RPM's, 160 t-stat), Decals, Cartek Clutch!, Strange 12 bolt w/3.73's "4.10's in the closet"
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 04:41 PM
|
#10
|
|
Guest
|
I have to disagree with that last statement. Frank(96blackss) can shift faster than most auto's, trust me on this one. I have never seen anyone shift a manuel as fast as him, anyone who's ridden with him knows what I mean  But, I'd have to say that with a good driver the M6 is gonna win, but if the driver is anything less than good it's the auto's race.
------------------
Camride ~ 1994 Bright Red Camaro Z28 A4. For sale.
Camride's Page
|
|
|
|
06-14-2002, 05:25 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 7,676
|
Agreed with the staement above, I shift faster then hell to, with a power shift you get a split seocnd spike in the RPMS too, not worth much, but engines, and weight being the same may make the difference.
------------------
1994 Medium Quaser Blue Camaro 3.4L V6 w/ 5-speed
Homeade CAI with a huge K&N cylinder filter, Single outlet Flowmaster with resonator, Accel 8mm ignition wires, Splitfire plugs, 3.42 gears and posi off a 97 WS6, 1 piece steel driveshaft, Converted to 4-wheel disc brakes, 1LE transmision mount, 1LE sway bars, Prothane bushings and endlinks, BMR Strut tower brace, ASP underdrive pulleys
Lightest Weight W/out driver: 3160
15.696@86.22 with a 2.214 60'!
Best R/T .507
Best 60' 2.106
Father's Stock 2000 Navy Blue Camaro 3.8L V6 w/ 5-speed
15.875@88.25 With wheel spin in 1st
AIM: MustangEater82
__________________
-2007 Pontiac G6 Sedan (Former cars, '85, '94, '00 Camaros, '92 5.0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE1252's Keeper
Yes, and while I'm all for swallowing, I draw the line at yogurt flavored Pepsi. 
|
|
|
|
06-15-2002, 01:08 AM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 1,559
|
FYI- the 93's were the year for the good trannys with the close ratios. 94+ came with taller ratios.
Yeah it al depends on both drivers.
The auto could be dumb and blow it at the line just as the Manual driver too. Most likely the Auto car would launch better by around 2 tenths, but the Manual car would make up that time by the end of the 1/4 mile, that is if the driver is GOOD.
So have the guys do some runs with other people and see how they do at the line. Then you can do the bet.
------------------
my93z286spd@yahoo.com
93 Z28 M6
01 WS6 Trans Am A4
91 Talon TSi AWD Turbo
89 Suzuki GSX-R 750
Brevard Muscle Car Enthusiasts Founder
www.gmmuscle.cz28.com
Street Lethal Performance & F-Body Organization
www.streetlethalperfomance.com
Page w/ Mods & Movies !
www.93z286spd.cz28.com
|
|
|
06-15-2002, 08:07 AM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 1,619
|
Just a thought on an auto shifting as fast as a 6 speed. Remember to factor in the PCM into the equation since it looks for RPM's, speed, and load to determine when to shift. Granted most of this is in microseconds but they still have to all meet the criteria for a shift before the PCM directs the shift and it is then executed.
For example. My T/A has a built tranny and lots of special items. I have it programmed to shift at 5400 RPM. In looking at logged runs the shift actually happens at 5800-5900 RPM due to vehicle acceleration being faster than the PCM reading all parameters and actually completing the shift. If I program it to shift 6100 then it hits the rev limiter at 6700 before it shifts.
For the most part (on "equal" cars) the determining factors will be traction (60' times) and vehicle weight. Unless of course the 6-speed drivers is pretty bad at shifts or misses a shift.
Just my .02
Later ... Larry S.
------------------
'95 Trans Am - Powerdyne
11.874 @ 118.92 MPH
__________________
'95 Trans Am - Powerdyne
11.760 @ 118.96 MPH on Nitto DR's
429 RWHP & 440 RWTQ
|
|
|
06-17-2002, 02:33 AM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Casselberry, Florida
Posts: 28
|
Hey everyone thanks for winning me a 50$ bar tab! Also, I am moving to Orlando anyone know of any good club meeting around there?
Thanks again for all the input
__________________
94' White Z28
18" Zennetti Wheels
3.42s, LCA's, Lowered
99 yami R1
85/88 Black Mustang 5.0
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.
|