

|
10-15-2003, 01:46 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: pa
Posts: 1,993
|
do bone stock 88 mustang gt's run 13.9
this loud mouth kid is talking crap to my friend saying he is bone stock and runs a 13.995 i thought they were 14.6-15.3 range
__________________
1994 trans am 398 ci lt1, baur solid roller, lloyd elliot cut and welded heads,
th400 rev man shift, moser 9in, 4.30's
2000 tl1000r - 10 inch stretch, 200 mm drag radial, tre, lowered and nasty
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 02:03 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: online
Posts: 12
|
Depends on what his definition of stock is. I really don't think an 88 5.0 could run those times straight off the showroom floor.
__________________
1993 Eagle Talon TSi AWD (sold)
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 02:07 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: pa
Posts: 1,993
|
he has headers x-pipe and thats it on street tires 5spd with 3.08 gears
__________________
1994 trans am 398 ci lt1, baur solid roller, lloyd elliot cut and welded heads,
th400 rev man shift, moser 9in, 4.30's
2000 tl1000r - 10 inch stretch, 200 mm drag radial, tre, lowered and nasty
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 03:15 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 3,685
|
Not bone stock. With headers and a x-pipe along with a set of slicks and skinnies I think it could be done...it would take a hell of a 60' though cause w/full exhaust those cars are only trapping 95-96 mph. I'm sure SteveY and Scott9050 will chime in a say they run 13s stock.  I have never seen a stock 5.0 run anywhere near 13s - morel ike 14.7-15.6 depending on year/tranny.
__________________
'93 Z28 M6 | Nutek 396 | F.A.S.T. EFI | LE2/LE4 | 11.7 @ 119 N/A
'05 GTO M6 - DD
More Info
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 08:16 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bentonville, AR
Posts: 1,666
|
Quote:
Originally posted by amean94ta
he has headers x-pipe and thats it on street tires 5spd with 3.08 gears
|
Technically thats not stock  Plus I would *think* from my experience that it would take more than that to get one of those cars into the 13.99 range. But that is my guess from what I have seen....
There are always factory freaks, BlackHatch's stock Fox went like 14.2X So they exist...
Has he got slips to prove his claim?
__________________
2004 GTO
2006 Mazda 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Threxx
Like for example, try to describe to me how a computer works in Ebonics. You just can't. 
|
Last edited by Kris93/95Z28; 10-15-2003 at 07:10 PM.
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 10:05 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Eastampton/ Mt.Holly, New Jersey
Posts: 6,845
|
Highly unlikely, but i have heard some guys either do it or get damn close w/ good tires...
__________________
1995 Z28 w/ LS1 Swap -
K&N CAI, Mac Mids, SLP LM1 CB, Fuddle 3600 Stall, Hayden Trans. Cooler, P&P TB, A4 w/ 342’s, Hotchkis LCA’s, UMI STB, !AC, Black C5 Wheels...96mm PP Intake & NW 90mm TB Coming.
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 10:10 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Lansing/Howell/Farmington Hills
Posts: 38
|
Unfortunatley I was never able to run completley stock, as my stock h-pipe was in dire need of replacement when I bought the car.
With just the o/r h-pipe though I was able to click off some 13.9's on the stock width street tires (dunlops) and the stock 2.73's.
Granted I do have quite a weight advantage over gt's and even the lx hatches.
With that being said, if he does have aftermarket headers and a x-pipe I could see one clicking off some 13.9's with the 3.08s'.
If he's telling you the truth, just ask to see his timeslips. I know I always keep my best ones in my glovebox  .
EDIT: I forgot to mention my times were run on my stock 160,000 mile engine, drivetrain, suspension etc.
__________________
1989 lx 5.0 (notch)
96 Exploder engine, twin .60/.48 turbos, 42lb injectors, 3 1/2" pro-m univer maf, 255 intake pump, 24x12x3 intercooler, Off-road H-pipe, Edlebrock Performer, Intake, Flowmasters, Nitto 275 40 17's, 3.73's, AJE Tubular k-member/A-arms, maximum lowers, Ford Uppers, 99 Disc Brake Conversion
Last edited by millhouse; 10-15-2003 at 10:13 AM.
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 10:35 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tryon, Ok
Posts: 75
|
I now own a fox (1993 LX notch) 5.0, and in a lot of research, it isn't likely, but there have been more than a few. it's also entirely possible that the car has some mods without him knowing. A ported lower, underdrives can be put on an virtually undetectable. With Long tubes and an X then yeah, I've heard of more than one guy pulling 13's with those mods.
The mustang is a lot about driver and 60'. I've never seen the ET's with such low traps (and I am used to AWD cars!) Course most stangs on the street have good traps and crap ET's
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 11:15 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 455
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Kris93/95Z28
Technically thats not stock Plus I would *think* from my experience that it would take more than that to get one of those cars into the 13.99 range. But that is my guess from what I have seen....
There are always factory freaks, BlackHatch's stock Fox went like 13.2X So they exist...
Has he got slips to prove his claim?
|
Actually the stang hasn't gone 13.2's...that was the nearly stock Z that did that.
Stang ran low low 14's with a very ****ty sixty foot time. The traction lock is burned up so my 60ft time was like the 2.3 range and mph was around 98.
That was a completely stock mustang down to the paper air filter and stock air silencer. Stock exhaust, timing, etc.
Mike 92LX was there at the track with me and saw the runs as a couple of other Tealnet.com members.
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 12:28 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 1,048
|
Quote:
Originally posted by 97bowtie
Not bone stock. With headers and a x-pipe along with a set of slicks and skinnies I think it could be done...it would take a hell of a 60' though cause w/full exhaust those cars are only trapping 95-96 mph.
I agree. Maybe add 3.73 gears too, to get there.
I'm sure SteveY and Scott9050 will chime in a say they run 13s stock.
I have never seen a stock 5.0 run anywhere near 13s - morel ike 14.7-15.6 depending on year/tranny.
That's about right for what I've seen.
|
Maybe it is possible to run a 13.9 stock, but it is like the high 12 second LS1 or my car running 13.6 stock, very unlikely and very unusual.
__________________
'00 Mustang GT, 5-speed.
Intake, cat back, tuner, synthetic oils, pulleys, 180 lbs. of weight reduction, 3.73s, DRs.
'98 Jeep Cherokee, I-6, automatic, K&N.
Father's car that I drive and wrench on:
'98 Z28, auto, 3.23s, T-tops, dronemaster cat-back, lid, K&N, tune, free mods.
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 12:36 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 1,032
|
I forget exactly which year, but I think it was 88, wasn't their a few mustangs made that were stripper cars. Had no accesories, or you could order them like that. I believe one of the mags tested one of the stripper cars and got a 13 sec run out of it.
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 05:49 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Pedro, CA
Posts: 853
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sax1031
I forget exactly which year, but I think it was 88, wasn't their a few mustangs made that were stripper cars. Had no accesories, or you could order them like that. I believe one of the mags tested one of the stripper cars and got a 13 sec run out of it.
|
It was a stripped notch back with no power accersories, no ac no radio etc...
They called them the "sleepers" because it was a stock class car "no mods" but could run pretty hard
I have an old edition of Mustangs and Fast fords where they chronicled the 5.0L history....pretty good read I will dig it up and get the trap
__________________
06 350z Track Model - 280.2hp (dynapack) times coming
95 Civic Del Sol Project car -- times coming
93 Civic Si Hatch 156whp CFE 14.6@96 2.2 60' SOLD
95 Civic Del Sol 144whp - never run - low 15's or so
99' Civic Hatch 160whp CFE 13.63@101 w/ 2.08 60' SOLD
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 07:14 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bentonville, AR
Posts: 1,666
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BlackHatch
Actually the stang hasn't gone 13.2's...that was the nearly stock Z that did that.
Stang ran low low 14's with a very ****ty sixty foot time. The traction lock is burned up so my 60ft time was like the 2.3 range and mph was around 98.
That was a completely stock mustang down to the paper air filter and stock air silencer. Stock exhaust, timing, etc.
Mike 92LX was there at the track with me and saw the runs as a couple of other Tealnet.com members.
|
yeah sorry about that I meant low 14s....
I guess I was half asleep when I posted that... lol
I edited it, before the bs flags start rising
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 10:56 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vegas
Posts: 262
|
i have a friend that has a 92 gt, auto, that says he could beat a z28....what would his car run, also he has 100,000 on the clock, and bone stock.
|
|
|
10-15-2003, 11:32 PM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: online
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
Originally posted by PoloGreen 3.4
i have a friend that has a 92 gt, auto, that says he could beat a z28....what would his car run, also he has 100,000 on the clock, and bone stock.
|
Depends on what year z28. Just know that his car's not fast.
__________________
1993 Eagle Talon TSi AWD (sold)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.
|