NOS "Noszle" kits ???

bowtiepwr · 06-19-2002, 09:21 AM

>Has anyone seen or know anything about this kit ? part # is 08008NOS and it 's supposed to connect to the intake manifold w/out drilling or plumbing . I couldn't find it on their web site , but it's on page 53 in Aug. 2002 Super Chevy magazine .
Later ...

stay safe

bowtiepwr · 06-19-2002, 09:27 AM

>I found it at Summit Racing (go figure

)
NOS-08008 CYLINDER KIT MPFI NOZZLE UNIV $1,499.95

, but no photo

Later ...

stay safe

[This message has been edited by bowtiepwr (edited June 19, 2002).]

Injuneer · 06-19-2002, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bowtiepwr:
>Has anyone seen or know anything about this kit ? part # is 08008NOS and it 's supposed to connect to the intake manifold w/out drilling or plumbing . I couldn't find it on their web site , but it's on page 53 in Aug. 2002 Super Chevy magazine .
Later ...
stay safe

You have to look closer.....

http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/ProdLin...OS/NOSzle.html

They list it under "Ford", but its a "universal" kit.

I've seen this setup intstalled on a Pro 5.0 Mustang. You still need to "plumb" the nitrous and the fuel to the individual NOSzles. And, depending on what kind of engine you are putting it on, you will need to raise the fuel rails to accomodate the added height of the injectors.

There have been a couple of posts on this system over the past few months... might want to do a "search".

Administrative note... you are required to have a "visible" e-mail address. Please go to the "profile" screen and check "yes" in the correct box.

------------------
Fred
94 Formula A3: 381/TH400/N2O
Detailed Mod's List
11.513@115.59 on motor; 11.162@127.67, 1.643 60' on a 125-shot. Going with a 275-shot this year

[This message has been edited by Injuneer 94FormM6 (edited June 19, 2002).]

bowtiepwr · 06-19-2002, 11:32 AM

>You mean this ... ?

"Keep your email address viewable to other users when you post notes? yes ( ) no (x)
-this was an option isn't it ?
I didn't see where it says it
"you are required to have a "visible" e-mail address."
let me know and I will check the "correct" box .
Later ...

stay safe

bowtiepwr · 06-19-2002, 11:34 AM

>Oh ... thanks for finding that . I normally don't look at Mustang parts , but there is room for change

.
Later ...

stay safe

KTamez · 06-19-2002, 03:33 PM

First Paragraph in the CZ28.com FAQ Section:
http://www.camaroz28.com/bb/faq.html#register

On the topic, The NOSzle intrigues me, but maybe I'm too "Old School" for it. Just seems like it would create a problem with the Fuel Injector, being it needs to pass through a 3/4" "Corridor" much smaller then it normally has when placed into the Bung....Probably just my paranoia...

------------------
Kurtis Tamez
LT4-396.com
97 Z28 LT4-396
94 Firehawk LT1-396

Hot Rod Hawk · 06-19-2002, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bowtiepwr:
>You mean this ... ?

"Keep your email address viewable to other users when you post notes? yes ( ) no (x)
-this was an option isn't it ?
I didn't see where it says it
"you are required to have a "visible" e-mail address."
let me know and I will check the "correct" box .
Later ...
stay safe

Yes you must be visible with your e-mail addy, without it how can we send you your "Free gifts"...Thanks for stoping by!!

[This message has been edited by Hot Rod Hawk (edited June 19, 2002).]

Injuneer · 06-19-2002, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KTamez:

On the topic, The NOSzle intrigues me, but maybe I'm too "Old School" for it. Just seems like it would create a problem with the Fuel Injector, being it needs to pass through a 3/4" "Corridor" much smaller then it normally has when placed into the Bung....Probably just my paranoia...

Kurt:

I asked the guys that did the Pro 5.0 install (Second Street Speed, Perkasie PA, builders of the engine for the world's quickest LT1...

- the Pro 5.0 is there own shop car) if they were concerned about the NOSzles interfering with the injector spray pattern. They said they thought about it, and did a before and after "all motor" engine dyno test on the NOSzles, and found absolutely no change in power output. They also were able to do a chassis dyno comparison on nitrous with their previous fogger nozzle setup, and they picked up 30rwHP with the NOSzles. But, that was using them for nitrous only.... they are strong proponents of controlling fuel directly through the injectors, and the latest MoTeC 800 ECU makes it very easy to do it that way.

They seemed to feel the NOSzles were a significant improvement. Of course this does not address the life expectancy or reliability of the NOSzles, as the car is still waiting for its intial track shakedown runs.

juicey · 10-15-2002, 03:38 PM

In all reality, you'd think NOS would do a whole bunch of testing before releasing it to the public. So, I really doubt it interferes with anything. It just doesn't seem logical. NOS could be in a lot of trouble if they released a system and people started melting **** down left and right.

So, I am pretty confident that the system is pretty fool proof if installed correctly.

Thats probably the key part, installing Correctly.
later
wes