Lt4 valve spring retainers(caps), differences from LT1
#1
Lt4 valve spring retainers(caps), differences from LT1
Whats the difference from the LT4 valve spring retainers than the Lt1's, the meterial? If so what are they both made out of? Also what about the keepers(locks) any different?
#9
Not doubting you, [and Lloyd seems to agree...]
That is why my interest is piqued here..
Would be interesting to know if they ARE the same?
I find this info:
10212802 LT1 Cap, (Retainer) valve spring
10212808 Valve Spring Cap LT4 - ZZ4
These valve spring caps are used on 1996 LT4 Corvette ZZ4 engines as well as the special service only heads P/N 12556463. These are light weight caps.
Technical Note: Use with spring P/N 12551483.
Sure is interesting...
If they are in fact the same, I wasted the $$ on them when I swapped to LT4 springs...
Anyone got one of each, for measurements/weight comparisons?
Thanks!
Charlie
That is why my interest is piqued here..
Would be interesting to know if they ARE the same?
I find this info:
10212802 LT1 Cap, (Retainer) valve spring
10212808 Valve Spring Cap LT4 - ZZ4
These valve spring caps are used on 1996 LT4 Corvette ZZ4 engines as well as the special service only heads P/N 12556463. These are light weight caps.
Technical Note: Use with spring P/N 12551483.
Sure is interesting...
If they are in fact the same, I wasted the $$ on them when I swapped to LT4 springs...
Anyone got one of each, for measurements/weight comparisons?
Thanks!
Charlie
#10
they definitely "seem" to be the same. They are VERY close if they are not the same.
Even though they are possibly the same, the spring and retainer set up seems to be OK for a Hot Cam and 1.6 rockers. I do not know of anyone that has had problems with them but on paper, a better spring would be better. These only have about 100 lbs open and 280 open there is barely room before coil bind so you cant shim them for any more pressure. I guess it is the slower ramp of the Hot Cam that makes them suffice but you would normally like more seat pressure, more open pressure and more room before coil bind.
For anyone using the Hot Cam, Combination Motorsport has the 612 kit that fits with no machining and can handle up to .580 lift and is only like $80 for springs, retainers and locks.
After checking the specs and clearance of the hot cam springs, I am amazed that more people have not had problems but they seem to be OK. They just "should" have problems.
NightTrain66
Even though they are possibly the same, the spring and retainer set up seems to be OK for a Hot Cam and 1.6 rockers. I do not know of anyone that has had problems with them but on paper, a better spring would be better. These only have about 100 lbs open and 280 open there is barely room before coil bind so you cant shim them for any more pressure. I guess it is the slower ramp of the Hot Cam that makes them suffice but you would normally like more seat pressure, more open pressure and more room before coil bind.
For anyone using the Hot Cam, Combination Motorsport has the 612 kit that fits with no machining and can handle up to .580 lift and is only like $80 for springs, retainers and locks.
After checking the specs and clearance of the hot cam springs, I am amazed that more people have not had problems but they seem to be OK. They just "should" have problems.
NightTrain66
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
02-09-2016 09:21 PM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
07-04-2005 05:00 PM