Iron LT1 head Vs Aluminum LT1 head - CamaroZ28.Com Message Board


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-25-2003, 08:31 PM   #1
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 267
Iron LT1 head Vs Aluminum LT1 head

Which is better flowing head.

Read that the iron head has 5% better flow.

http://www.automotiverebuilder.com/ar/ar99928.htm
BlueCamaroZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2003, 08:37 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 950
The iron heads do flow better, but the additional weight will far out-weigh any flow advantages it may have over the aluminum castings.
carlos64030 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2003, 08:38 PM   #3
Registered User
 
ibanez6rg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 4,585
You can get more out of the iron heads.
ibanez6rg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2003, 07:48 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: smog zone adjacent to a great lake
Posts: 1,462
Might you have links to info that will substantiate that response?
arnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2003, 08:02 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Pasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,368
I think this is a matter of personal preference. I've seen many a argument about this, iron or aluminum. It seems you get better flow with iron heads but more weight reduction with the aluminum. Its the ketchup or mustard battle. IMO, go with the aluminum.
Pasky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2003, 08:34 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: smog zone adjacent to a great lake
Posts: 1,462
The original ? refers to flow, and flow alone. While it is agreed (?), that in regards to oem virgin castings, the iron has the flow advantage. However, to be fair, I believe the answer/discussion should also include flow with the full potential of the head realized, IOW, ported.

To uncomplicate the issue, leave the weight or durability variable out of the discussion. This way, the answer would not be a matter of personal preference. Now for the links giving the flow advantage to iron. Or was the above reply referring strictly to oem virgin casting flow #s?

Last edited by arnie; 12-26-2003 at 08:37 AM.
arnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2003, 02:30 PM   #7
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 267
Talking

How about the combustion chamber size? What is the spec for each. Heard that the iron is 64cc ,while Aluminum is 58cc, yielding less compression.

Last edited by BlueCamaroZ28; 12-26-2003 at 02:41 PM.
BlueCamaroZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2003, 04:04 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Posts: 1,967
Umm people, aluminum heads are the ones that are sought after. They disperse heat way better than iron.
96 WS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2003, 04:15 PM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,213
Quote:
Originally posted by 96 WS6
Umm people, aluminum heads are the ones that are sought after. They disperse heat way better than iron.
And need more compression to make the same power because of that.
LameRandomName is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2003, 04:17 PM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: smog zone adjacent to a great lake
Posts: 1,462
Quote:
Originally posted by 96 WS6
Umm people, aluminum heads are the ones that are sought after. They disperse heat way better than iron.
That is a negative, not a positive. Heat is energy. If it goes in the radiator, it is not turning the tires.
arnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2003, 04:32 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: smog zone adjacent to a great lake
Posts: 1,462
Quote:
Originally posted by 96 WS6
...aluminum heads are the ones that are sought after...
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueCamaroZ28
How about the combustion chamber size?
Which is better flowing head?

It would be great, if we could stick to the topic/question. Iron does have larger C C, precise specs not handy, but the relevancy here, as I perceive it, is not the size as it relates to CR, but the flow influence (unshrouding) any additional area available, surrounding the valves generates, plus any flow influence/difference, in general, the different combustion chamber shape causes. Although an all around different shaped chamber could be considered an intangible, cuz it may have little affect on measured flow bench #s, but influence flame travel, which could have an effect on dyno #s.

Last edited by arnie; 12-26-2003 at 04:46 PM.
arnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2003, 11:15 AM   #12
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 796
The iron LT1 heads flow better than the aluminum F-body LT1 heads straight out of the box. The iron heads are the same as the Corvette aluminum LT1 heads, but the F-body aluminum LT1 heads are different(you know, the Corvette can't be slower than the Camaro). As for which head is better, the iron will hold the heat better which will make more power at the top end. Both heads can be ported to flow the same so that is a moot point. It comes down to preference if you want to save weight, go with the aluminum.
Jeff H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2003, 11:21 AM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 860
Iron normaly flow better, and have a stronger cast. Iron works well on boosted cars but they can develope hot spots. Alum lifts. I really think it boils down to the combo and goals you have.
94SLUG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2003, 11:23 AM   #14
Registered User
 
Fastbird93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Waynesboro, PA
Posts: 4,833
Quote:
Originally posted by Jeff H
The iron heads are the same as the Corvette aluminum LT1 heads, but the F-body aluminum LT1 heads are different(you know, the Corvette can't be slower than the Camaro).
I beg to differ. The Corvette heads were the same as the F-body heads. The difference comes in the cam profile, but that's another topic.

The Iron Heads will flow better than the aluminum straight out of the box.
Fastbird93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2003, 01:49 PM   #15
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 478
Ive always wondered why the ironheaded LT1 makes less power. Im guessing the cam profile is designed for more low end torque to get B-body cars off the line. or maybe a more restricted exhaust?

Impala SS's usually dyno 210-225rwhp
Auto LT1 f-bodys usually dyno in the 230-240rwhp range.
meengreen 94z is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
original vented opti, 97 timing cover, heads *Emilia* Parts For Sale 9 05-13-2015 10:05 AM
LT1 into a 3rd gen InfernalVortex LT1 Based Engine Tech 3 01-17-2015 10:35 AM
LT1 Head Gaskets, Head Bolts, Aluminum Heads HectorM52 Parts Wanted 2 01-10-2015 10:01 PM
what all interchanges between the iron and al heads Brandon Wittmer General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech 0 12-07-2014 01:15 PM
hey hey hey thenewkid New Member Introduction 5 11-27-2014 10:41 AM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Copyright © 1996-2013 CamaroZ28.Com. All rights reserved.