Welcome to CamaroZ28.Com, the ultimate Source for Camaro enthusiasts! Here you can join over 90,000 Camaro enthusiasts from around the world discussing all things related to Camaros and more. You are currently viewing as a guest which gives you limited access to view discussions
To gain full access to our forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
Participate in over 40 different forums and search/browse from over 5 million posts.
Is this okay for everyday driving? Am I going to be leaving a bunch of power on the table by not incresing the compression to say 11.0:1 or even 11.5:1? This is going to be a nitrous solid roller motor.
Thanks
This ad is not displayed to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on CamaroZ28.com!
i'm sticking to exactly the same thing for my 355 hydrallic engine...
people say they run 11.5:1 but all machine shops said, even with reverse flow cooling heads u still wanna stay in the 10's...
i'd say thats perfect, can't get much better than stock!
i'm sticking to exactly the same thing for my 355 hydrallic engine...
people say they run 11.5:1 but all machine shops said, even with reverse flow cooling heads u still wanna stay in the 10's...
i'd say thats perfect, can't get much better than stock!
i think the lt4 was 11.1 if i remember correctly
__________________
Newbie - US ARMY - Germany
1994 formula Firebird green - RIP, for now
1995 Camaro z28 T56 3.42, kooks, Magnaflow, AFR Elbow, LPE CAI, UMI suspension stuff...
Elaborate please...
The cam in my car is a custom ground Cam Motion solid roller camshaft. The specs of the cam are = 245.7/251.1, .654/.606 installed at a 111.8 Lobe seperation. The Duration is at .05
Yeah, I plan on driving it around some, but mainly to local car shows and events. It should still do fine for street/strip duty, even with that cam. Jordon used that very same cam grind and loved how it acted on the street.
it all depends on your static compression. Dynamic compression is not all that important. My 383 is running 10.5:1 compression, and I wish I would of went with 11.5, which would of netted me a rough 8.5 static compression, which you want to stay under 9.0 for pump gas.
__________________
1995 Pontiac TA M6
383, LE AFR'S, BAUER Cam, Kook 1 3/4 stepped to 1 7/8 Kook SS Headers, Borla, DHM, Custom Clutch, Moser 12 Bolt (4:10) All Spohn Suspension,QA1's, all the bolt ons possible, and Daily Driven. 443rwhp 408 tq
it all depends on your static compression. Dynamic compression is not all that important. My 383 is running 10.5:1 compression, and I wish I would of went with 11.5, which would of netted me a rough 8.5 static compression, which you want to stay under 9.0 for pump gas.
I'm running 12.5 CR and race my car on pump gas most of the time. My cam is bigger than the one you listed though. No pinging and the car runs great on it. In fact..my 10.7 pass was on 93 pump gas.
__________________
95 firebird M6, 355, stock crank, Steve Stumph/SAR2K ported lt4 heads, custom Futral Motorsports solid roller,Moser 9" with 4.71's and a spool. Madman suspension
10.39@131.6 1.42 60' NA 476 rwhp/408 rwtq(pump gas and old lt4 setup..new setup coming soon)
10.93 @ 125.8 1.47 60' Na on old lt1 heads/intake.(428rhwp/407 rwtq)
i'm sticking to exactly the same thing for my 355 hydrallic engine...
people say they run 11.5:1 but all machine shops said, even with reverse flow cooling heads u still wanna stay in the 10's...
i'd say thats perfect, can't get much better than stock!
My machine shop said the same but I heard different from Lloyd and Brett. Dynamic compression plays a role along with cam selection. I choose a custom grind based on my piston cc and deck height. I'll have a tight quench of .036 so we went from there. Lloyd didn't even want to do a cam selection till I had deck height and piston cc. I was told it will be close to the GM847 but... with a lil more lift
__________________
It ain't stock ....94 Z-28 A4 383 12.4:1 CR on 93 octane... Lunati Crank... Manley 6"H-beams...Mahle pro series flat tops... AI 200cc Head/Cam/Intake ... 58MM TB, Racetronix fuel system kit, Lucas 37# injectors, 160* T-stat, E.W.P., TransGo Shift kit, 3400 Edge Stall, Strange S60 w/4.10's full suspension
All else being equal.. I've heard that each point of compression you come up is worth ~10hp... Personally I'd think it to be more, since any blown motor application (i.e. 9.0:1) I've seen dyno about 40rwhp less than it probably would if it were up around 11:1 . Then again.. Who am I to talk? My car only makes 385rwhp and is 12.2:1 .. lol. I suck!
next question?
__________________
Shawn
2006 Black Trailblazer SS - 12.25@110mph : Custom cam, Kooks LT's and 3600 Vig TC
2005 Seadoo RXP
TexasTA,
It really depends on the complete setup like Rich said. Its all about the dynamic compression, not the static. I am running a 12 to 1 using a solid roller thats 254/262 on a 111 LSA. It nets me a dynamic of about 8.5 to 1. BTW, can we hook up this week.
Michael
__________________
1995 Formula 383, BRE Solid Roller Cam, Larry Meaux AFR 227s, LE Victor E, Nitrous Express Plate, Fast XFI, M6