LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

stock rear gear ratio, '01 Z28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2002, 01:04 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
DS01Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central California
Posts: 148
stock rear gear ratio, '01 Z28

Does anyone know what the stock rear end gear ratio is on a 2001 Z28? It has the 5.7 litre motor and automatic transmission. I looked at the owner's manual (nothing there) and the original window sticker from when I bought it (no mention there either). My Z28 has NO upgrade packages. So, is it a 2.73? 3.23? or 3.42? Buehler? Buehler? Anybody?!


Thanks much gang!
Daryl
'01 Z28: K&N, FlowMaster, HyperTech
DS01Z28 is offline  
Old 12-14-2002, 01:14 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
2001NBMZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,655
A4's came with either 2.73 or 3.23. Check the RPO code on the driver's door:

GU2- 2.73

GU5- 3.23
2001NBMZ28 is offline  
Old 12-14-2002, 01:19 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
96Forged281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16
they came with 2.73s and they still run mid 13s?? damn why cant the camaro look good then id buy one
96Forged281 is offline  
Old 12-14-2002, 01:21 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
DS01Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central California
Posts: 148
Thanks Indy,
Just checked.... it's a GU2, therfore a 2.73 rear gear ratio. Many, many thanks... Now I can go program my HyperTech!

Thanks again,
Daryl
DS01Z28 is offline  
Old 12-14-2002, 01:25 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
DS01Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central California
Posts: 148
thanks also to Forged 281. Good piece-of-mind confirming that gear ratio!

Thanks much,
Daryl

P.S.- what's so bad about the looks of the Camaro?
DS01Z28 is offline  
Old 12-14-2002, 05:56 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
96Forged281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16
ok not to start a flame its just my opnion of why i dont like the looks 1. the dash is too long feels like your sitting in a cockpit 2. seats feel like you are seating on the ground not really comfortable to me 3. passanger side theres that bump i guess where the tranny is i dunno? 4. 93-97s look worse 98-02 dont look as bad i just dont like the look of the long nose NOW the transam even though on the inside i dont like those for the same reason, on the outside i think they just look plain mean
96Forged281 is offline  
Old 12-14-2002, 06:31 PM
  #7  
Moderator
 
PhantomTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Chelsea, MI
Posts: 2,881
Lots of people say they dont like the hump.. Allthough ost people have never rode in the passenger side of a f-body yet they still say they dont like it. Doesnt effect the driver. And i dont even notice it if im in the passenger seat.

The low seating is fine to me.. all the old musclecars were like that. plus with my power seats i can raise the seat.. and its fine.

You sound like %95 of the corral who have never drover ridden in an F-body
PhantomTA is offline  
Old 12-14-2002, 09:20 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
SteveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Poway, CA
Posts: 368
Talking

96Forged281;

Don't be so critical of the F-bodies, if you had any real taste at all, YOU WOULD NOT BE DRIVING A FORD IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!

JMHO

SteveC
SteveC is offline  
Old 12-14-2002, 09:33 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
96Z28TealM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 118
Where do you guys find the GU2/GU5, I heard it's in the glove department..I remember there was a paper stick to the glove department but it's gone now...so 3.42 was on all M6 from 93-97 or was it an option at one time.
96Z28TealM6 is offline  
Old 12-14-2002, 09:52 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
96Z28TealM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 118
sorry thought I was in the LT1 tech
96Z28TealM6 is offline  
Old 12-14-2002, 11:45 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
99blackSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,719
Originally posted by 96Forged281
ok not to start a flame its just my opnion of why i dont like the looks 1. the dash is too long feels like your sitting in a cockpit 2. seats feel like you are seating on the ground not really comfortable to me 3. passanger side theres that bump i guess where the tranny is i dunno? 4. 93-97s look worse 98-02 dont look as bad i just dont like the look of the long nose NOW the transam even though on the inside i dont like those for the same reason, on the outside i think they just look plain mean
I like the cockpit feeling although the dash board and nose are too long. That bump is a little annoying, it is for the cat. on the V6 models. GM could have taken out that bump on the V8 models but they were to cheap and lazy. All is over looked by the raw power.
99blackSS is offline  
Old 12-15-2002, 12:36 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
pineapplesink6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 205
i thought if it had the Z rated tires, 245's, it had 3.23. yes or no? maybe i am wrong........what are other ways of telling that it had 3.23 besides the tac!
pineapplesink6 is offline  
Old 12-15-2002, 01:03 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
Exclamation

Originally posted by pineapplesink6
i thought if it had the Z rated tires, 245's, it had 3.23. yes or no? maybe i am wrong........what are other ways of telling that it had 3.23 besides the tac!
Tires have nothing to do with what gears the car has......................it depends on the transmission (obiously ) where the M6 comes standard with 3.42's, and the auto comes standard with 2.73's, while 3.23's are an option (and apparently the car gets an aluminum driveshaft with 3.23's?? ).

You can tell by checking the door jamb sticker (again, GU2 = 2.73, GU5 = 3.23, GU6 = 3.42) or if you're still in 2nd gear at the end of the 1/4 mile........you've got 2.73's!
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 12-15-2002, 09:08 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
SteveC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Poway, CA
Posts: 368
Smile

Capn Pete;

I respectfully disagree with your above statement concerning the tires not making a difference in what rearend you get.

When I ordered my 2201 Z28 from the factory (maybe different with 2002), if you did not order the "Z" rated tires (code QLC or QEC I think), you could not get the GU5 or 3.23 rearends. This would also have the cars top speed limiter set to 117 MPH.

I have seen the dealers where I live pull alot of fast ones though. Case in point, I saw a brand new 2002 Z28, with an additional charge of $700 for "Chrome rims", and they mounted the "RSA" tires on them, with the RPO code in the door saying it had the GU5 option, which meens they removed the more expensive tires, with the addition of the chrome rims.

SteveC
SteveC is offline  
Old 12-15-2002, 12:21 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
Arrow

Originally posted by SteveC
Capn Pete;

I respectfully disagree with your above statement concerning the tires not making a difference in what rearend you get.

When I ordered my 2201 Z28 from the factory (maybe different with 2002), if you did not order the "Z" rated tires (code QLC or QEC I think), you could not get the GU5 or 3.23 rearends. This would also have the cars top speed limiter set to 117 MPH.

SteveC
OK, I hear your point...................maybe you must have Z-rated tires to get the 3.23's, but Z-rated tires certainly don't determine what gears you have, since my car (unless it's only the case for 2002's??) has 2.73's and Z-rated tires. You could be right though..........maybe until '02 things were different, because AFAIK, all '02 Z28's & T/A's came with Z-rated tires, while the 3.23 vs. 2.73 was still an option.
Capn Pete is offline  


Quick Reply: stock rear gear ratio, '01 Z28



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 AM.