LS1 Based Engine Tech LS1 / LS6 / LS2 / LS3 / LS7 Engine Tech

1998 Camaro, Engine Build Up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2012, 05:21 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Barney3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 15
Arrow 1998 Camaro, Engine Build Up

The motor in my Camaro went out and I'm thinking about a new motor. I have $2000-3000 to spend and I would like to get about 400+ rwhp n/a. Any ideas on setups and tuning options.
Barney3 is offline  
Old 05-03-2012, 06:09 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Need4Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,459
Re: 1998 Camaro, Engine Build Up

Originally Posted by Barney3
The motor in my Camaro went out and I'm thinking about a new motor. I have $2000-3000 to spend and I would like to get about 400+ rwhp n/a. Any ideas on setups and tuning options.
Easiest thing to do, buy a used LQ4 / LQ9 truck motor and swap over all your LS1 Accessories, Intake, Wiring and then throw on L92 heads and you're easily at 400 RWHP

LQ4's can cost about $1,200 and the heads are about $1,200 too so $2,400 and you're at 400RWHP on a newer / stronger engine.

If you go LQ4 you can boost later on but you wont make as much power N/A as a LQ9.

The LQX motors are basically Iron LS1's and are the same physical dimensions, have the same bolt patterns with the exception that you have to tap / drill an alternator bolt.

They might be slightly heavier but mod for mod will absolutely slaughter LS1's

Edit - Btw I forgot you will need either an LS3 or L76 intake with the L92 heads.
Need4Camaro is offline  
Old 05-03-2012, 06:37 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Barney3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 15
Re: 1998 Camaro, Engine Build Up

I was planning on boosting it and would like to get 400hp right now and add more later on. since I dont want to change engines 4 or 5 times which would be better lq4, 383 stroker, or a 408 with minor upgrades. I was also told that the lq4 and lq9 were not good for a bunch of boost because they weren't forged. do you know anything about this.
Barney3 is offline  
Old 05-03-2012, 07:16 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Need4Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,459
Re: 1998 Camaro, Engine Build Up

Originally Posted by Barney3
I was planning on boosting it and would like to get 400hp right now and add more later on. since I dont want to change engines 4 or 5 times which would be better lq4, 383 stroker, or a 408 with minor upgrades. I was also told that the lq4 and lq9 were not good for a bunch of boost because they weren't forged. do you know anything about this.
dont waste your time on the 383, the 408 makes alot more power for almost the same price. It depends on what you want though. Obviously the LQ4 is going to be more reliable under boost than the 408 is (less rotational mass) but the 408 is going to make a good bit more power, although a boosted LQ4 will FAR from dissapoint you as you should easily be up in the 600 HP range under boost.

Now if you want N/A now and boost later I would go LQ4... btw if you only have a budget of $3k...you're not getting a 408 for that...
Need4Camaro is offline  
Old 05-03-2012, 07:34 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Barney3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 15
Re: 1998 Camaro, Engine Build Up

Thanks for the advice but I have one last question. What kind of transmission should I run if I am going to run a turbo. Also what size turbo kit should I use and what brand.
Barney3 is offline  
Old 05-04-2012, 01:55 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Need4Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,459
Re: 1998 Camaro, Engine Build Up

Originally Posted by Barney3
Thanks for the advice but I have one last question. What kind of transmission should I run if I am going to run a turbo. Also what size turbo kit should I use and what brand.
once again depends on what you want. Either way you're ganna have to beef up the trans if you're ganna turbo. Another thing is your rear end, it's not going to take the abuse of a 600 HP motor for long at all so you're ganna need a 12 bolt or a 9"

Either trans will be fine as long as they're strengthened up a bit... Auto's are always more predictable.

As for turbo's, the forced induction section would be a better advocate for that.
Need4Camaro is offline  
Old 05-04-2012, 06:05 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Barney3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 15
Re: 1998 Camaro, Engine Build Up

-thanks, would it be better if i ran a ls9 clutch and flywheel or the stock ls1.
Barney3 is offline  
Old 05-05-2012, 01:47 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
rod442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 385
Re: 1998 Camaro, Engine Build Up

Originally Posted by Barney3
-thanks, would it be better if i ran a ls9 clutch and flywheel or the stock ls1.
does the ls9 clutch work in an f-body? how much is one?

and really, if your going to go turbo eventually; neither of those options is that great. the ls1 shouldn't even be on the table.

I know the zr1's are rated at 638hp, and Im sure the clutches are decent; but if your going FI in a heavier f-body; get a clutch that will last. and will hold more tq. the Zr1 makes less tq than hp, and a LSx turbo car will usually make MORE tq than hp. so you see the issue.

Ive been happy with my spec stg 4, but some people have had problems with em.

looks like a company that makes an ls9 kit to work in an f-body is at around 1500? very pricey. other twin disks are a bit cheaper. textralia used to be a good one. 12-1300?

ls9 is more than 1500. damn. http://ls1tech.com/forums/manual-tra...-body-gto.html

Last edited by rod442; 05-05-2012 at 01:55 AM.
rod442 is offline  
Old 05-05-2012, 07:19 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Need4Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,459
Re: 1998 Camaro, Engine Build Up

Originally Posted by Barney3
-thanks, would it be better if i ran a ls9 clutch and flywheel or the stock ls1.
The stock LS1 clutch will melt like a M&M under your foot with that kind of power. The LS9 clutch will probably handle the abuse for quite awhile but it is a good idea to go aftermarket unless you really want the LS9 clutch for drivability concerns.

Keep the stock flywheel. Going lighter makes launching much worse due to less rotational mass.
Need4Camaro is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jrlt1
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
01-03-2015 07:38 PM
hotrodyou1
Cars For Sale
1
12-20-2014 10:05 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
12-17-2014 02:50 PM
Bearmans
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
2
12-03-2014 05:28 AM
squirrels
Site Help and Suggestions
4
07-13-2002 01:58 AM



Quick Reply: 1998 Camaro, Engine Build Up



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.