General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

HELP: Conflicting 1969 Camaro Powertrain REAR AXLE Availablities

Old 12-23-2013, 07:43 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
camarosource's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 296
HELP: Conflicting 1969 Camaro Powertrain REAR AXLE Availablities

Hello,

I sincerely would appreciate some help on this matter of CONFLICTING information on the 1969 Camaro. I've literally spent HOURS researching and resulted in nothing more than a bad headache.

CONFLICTING INFORMATION

CONFLICT: #1

[ENGINE] : 200hp 307ci

[SOURCE] : 1969 Restoration Package (1 part of the technical information)
[DATE] April 1969

- Indicates the M40 "Turbo Hydra-Matic" had the following for the REAR AXLE:

[W/O A/C] - Std. : 2.56
[W/O A/C] - Econ. : NO
[W/O A/C] - Perf. : 2.73
[W/O A/C] - Spec. : NO

HOWEVER:

[SOURCE] : 1969 Restoration Package (1 part of the technical information)
[DATE] October 15, 1968

- Indicates the M40 "Turbo Hydra-Matic" had the following for the REAR AXLE:

[W/O A/C] - Std. : 2.56
[W/O A/C] - Econ. : NO
[W/O A/C] - Perf. : 2.73
[W/O A/C] - Spec. : 3:08 <----

HOWEVER:

[SOURCE] : 1969 USA Brochure
[DATE] UNKNOWN

- Indicates the M40 "Turbo Hydra-Matic" had the following for the REAR AXLE:

[W/O A/C] - Std. : 2.56
[W/O A/C] - Econ. : NO
[W/O A/C] - Perf. : 2.73
[W/O A/C] - Spec. : 3:08 OR 3.36 <----




CONFLICT #2

[ENGINE] : L22 155hp 250ci

[SOURCE] : 1969 Restoration Package (1 part of the technical information)
[DATE] October 15, 1968

- Indicates the M40 "Turbo Hydra-Matic" had the following for the REAR AXLE:

[W/O A/C] - Std. : 2.56
[W/O A/C] - Econ. : 2.73
[W/O A/C] - Perf. : NO
[W/O A/C] - Spec. : 3:08 OR 3.36 <----

HOWEVER

[SOURCE] : 1969 Restoration Package (1 part of the technical information)
[DATE] April 1969

- Indicates the M40 "Turbo Hydra-Matic" had the following for the REAR AXLE:

[W/O A/C] - Std. : 2.56
[W/O A/C] - Econ. : NO <--- Switched places?
[W/O A/C] - Perf. : 2.73 < --- Switched places?
[W/O A/C] - Spec. : 3:08 OR 3.36 <----

HOWEVER

[SOURCE] : 1969 USA Brochure
[DATE] UNKNOWN

- Indicates the M40 "Turbo Hydra-Matic" had the following for the REAR AXLE:

[W/O A/C] - Std. : 2.56
[W/O A/C] - Econ. : NO <--- Switched places?
[W/O A/C] - Perf. : 2.73 < --- Switched places?
[W/O A/C] - Spec. : 3:08 OR 3.36 <----


There is not a lot of 1st gen information that breaks down the powertrains down to the axles and combinations so I am having a difficult time finding the truth. I can't tell what is TYPO's (GM Brochures, and documentation is just FULL of bad typo's) and what are upgrades. Before anything goes on my site, I research and cross-reference between 1000's of sheets of information along with books, online resources, brochures, and magazines.. But there is not a lot of information with this deep of combinations on the 1st gen's..

Thanks
camarosource is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4586
Parts For Sale
2
01-03-2015 07:22 PM
nodnarb481
Middle Atlantic
0
01-01-2015 11:43 PM
rockync7
Cars For Sale
0
01-01-2015 05:10 AM
Collector Car
Cars For Sale
0
12-17-2014 01:12 PM
30thZ286speed
Car Audio and Electronics
1
08-03-2002 04:54 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: HELP: Conflicting 1969 Camaro Powertrain REAR AXLE Availablities



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 PM.