General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

97 V6 - How reliable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2005, 10:54 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
96SSConv#2033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 126
97 V6 - How reliable?

My SS is acting up so I am looking at buying another car. It is a 97 v6 with 65,000 miles. I am aware of the squeaks and rattles that plague our cars, but are there any quirks/major problems that stand out for the v6 (like the opti-crap on my SS)
Thanks.
96SSConv#2033 is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 10:56 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
shoebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 27,709
Re: 97 V6 - How reliable?

The 3800 V6 is a very good engine. Plug wires seem to be the thing that dies on them first (just normal maintenance stuff).
shoebox is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 10:59 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
lt11997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fargo,ND
Posts: 502
Re: 97 V6 - How reliable?

The 3.8's are good engines and last a long time.
lt11997 is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 11:03 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
MotorCityNova572's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Waterford / Clarkston Mich.
Posts: 220
Re: 97 V6 - How reliable?

My buddy has a 95 or 96 V-6 camaro...And he loves that thing....Still runs at good as it did back when it was new....Yea its got its little things but come on he babys this car...it got over 90k miles still runs strong....hits 110 MPH no problum
MotorCityNova572 is offline  
Old 07-30-2005, 01:52 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
breakmyfootoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Odessa/Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 1,066
Re: 97 V6 - How reliable?

I have a 97 V6 to commute to work in (see sig) and that thing never breaks. I call it my work truck. I have hauled a short block in it, and today I picked up a 2 piece Snap On tool box and enough tools to fill the box, it was literally sitting on the bump stops. When I hauled the short block from here to Lubbock I just pulled out the passenger seat, installed a cardboard "bedliner", and set the shortblock on the floor board where the passenger seat was. I hauled the block for the current engine in my 94 to and from the machine shop and all kinds of other stuff. The car has 130,00 miles on it and it never gives me any trouble, plus I get around 26 MPG on the highway. The only bad thing about it is pulling up to red lights next to Z28s and Mustangs wishing I was in one of my other cars.
breakmyfootoff is offline  
Old 07-30-2005, 08:20 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
johnnyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Greenville, PA
Posts: 785
Re: 97 V6 - How reliable?

dont 97 have 3.4 ? i thought 3.8 started in 98
johnnyb is offline  
Old 07-30-2005, 08:35 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
MustangEater82's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 4,738
Re: 97 V6 - How reliable?

Originally Posted by johnnyb
dont 97 have 3.4 ? i thought 3.8 started in 98

93-95.5 is the 3.4L

95.5-02 was the 3.8L

99+ 3.8L with tubular manfiolds(shorty header like, much easier to change plugs/wires)



Only problem I have read about the 3.4L is the rear main seal. It happens but not nearly as much as the opti-spark. I woudln't even say its common, but if I heard about it on a 3.8L I wouldn't be surprised.

There are people running up to 200k on these motors, boosting and juicing them to over 100k.

hell guy recently was running a 225 shot poorly setup, and it still didn't blow the motor.


BUT remember it is an f-body... so power windows, sqeuks rattles and everything else...


honestly I think the v6 is a good Daily driver for f-body guys, I'd say 85% of the parts are interchangeable if you had a few small problems with things.
MustangEater82 is offline  
Old 07-30-2005, 09:12 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
johnnyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Greenville, PA
Posts: 785
Re: 97 V6 - How reliable?

Originally Posted by MustangEater82
93-95.5 is the 3.4L

95.5-02 was the 3.8L

99+ 3.8L with tubular manfiolds(shorty header like, much easier to change plugs/wires)

WOW! I guess i was way off then. I thought the v6 changed when the v8 did
johnnyb is offline  
Old 07-30-2005, 08:11 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
GM_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 36
Re: 97 V6 - How reliable?

I know of several 3.8's with over 500,000miles on them. Not a single issue. I had a 88 park avenue with a 3.8 in it. Best car I ever had. I did some mods and was able to hang with stock LS1's. The 3.8 holds a whole lot of awards.
GM_man is offline  
Old 07-30-2005, 08:24 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Klypto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,419
Re: 97 V6 - How reliable?

yea, the v6 isnt anything fast (at all) but they do run great....

i have a z28 and a v6... well had a z.. swapping it all over next week totaled my z

cory
Klypto is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
03-13-2016 03:37 PM
WobblySausage
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
10-07-2015 02:44 PM
WobblySausage
Drivetrain
4
10-07-2015 10:09 AM
WPHIG2
Cars For Sale
0
08-27-2015 06:37 AM
karpetcm
Parts For Sale
5
08-14-2015 03:02 PM



Quick Reply: 97 V6 - How reliable?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 AM.