383 or 388?
#1
383 or 388?
my LT1 is bored .030 over to a 355, the 3.75 inch crank brings it to a 383, right?
a friend of mine said that some one on a mustang board told him the 6 inch rods make it a 388. i didnt think it did since it wouldnt increase the com,bustion area at all it would just add 3 tenths of an inch to the bottom and top of the stroke. so its still a 383 right?
i apreciate all responces. i just need some reassurance on this, id feel like a jack *** building a motor and not even knowing what i had.
thanks
a friend of mine said that some one on a mustang board told him the 6 inch rods make it a 388. i didnt think it did since it wouldnt increase the com,bustion area at all it would just add 3 tenths of an inch to the bottom and top of the stroke. so its still a 383 right?
i apreciate all responces. i just need some reassurance on this, id feel like a jack *** building a motor and not even knowing what i had.
thanks
#2
Rod length has no influence on cubic inches...just rod/stroke ratio.
Cubic inches = ((cylinder radius squared * 3.14)*stroke length)*# of cylinders
BTW, a 388 is attained by boring the block .060" over (4.060" bore) and using a standard 400 stroke (3.75").
Cubic inches = ((cylinder radius squared * 3.14)*stroke length)*# of cylinders
BTW, a 388 is attained by boring the block .060" over (4.060" bore) and using a standard 400 stroke (3.75").
Last edited by mongse_1; 04-16-2004 at 11:51 PM.
#5
Originally posted by Anderson
Just wondering, do you guys loose usable safe RPM's when you go to a longer stroked engine??
Just wondering, do you guys loose usable safe RPM's when you go to a longer stroked engine??
On that same note, you would lose usable rpms if you're running the same lift #s, of course, but it wouldn't hurt the engine to take it to the same point it was before.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post