CamaroZ28.Com Message Board

General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech For general F-Body discussion that does not fit in any other forum.
For F-Body Technical/Information Discussion ONLY

1994 LT1 was the best Year

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2004, 10:41 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
GreenDemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mishawaka, IN
Posts: 1,771
95
Or 96&97 due to the fact that the SS was back. Those have got to be my favorite years for the SSs, it seems like they lost some of that aggression when the LS1 SS came out.
GreenDemon is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-2004, 03:19 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
rpm4lalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Zip Tie Island
Posts: 725
95 best for LT1's.

Mine had the hardened pushrods, but I swapped them out for 1 piece hardened trick flow pushrods. The stockers were a two piece welded design, crap in my opinion.

The T56 in the 95 is also rated for more torque than the 93's T56.
rpm4lalo is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-2004, 03:34 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
MTL_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 885
Don't forget the '96's and '97's were dual cat vs. single cat before. Don't know if that makes much of a difference but they are rated 10 HP higher from the factory (285 HP vs. 275 HP for 1995 and before).
Last edited by MTL_Z28; 04-19-2004 at 03:37 PM.
MTL_Z28 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-2004, 04:03 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
JoeliusZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,926
95
JoeliusZ28 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-2004, 06:57 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
Tang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 225
Originally posted by JoeliusZ28
95
Amen brother!
Tang is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-2004, 09:44 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Kris93/95Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bentonville, AR
Posts: 1,451
Originally posted by lovescamaros25
I think the 94 camaro is the best because the convertible and t-top camaro returned.
The 93 s did have T-Tops as an option.. They are just not as plentiful as the later years.

it got the 4l60e transmission which replaced the 4l60.
Big win there

It also got an optional keyless entry system,better sound system,
You sure about that? Many 94s have the same 3 speaker system as the 93s, wasn't the 3->5 speaker a mid year option?

sequential fuel injection which was a huge improve ment over multi-port.It gave the camaro a smoother idle and also helped reduce emissions.
What? I have NEVER noticed a difference in idle in any year LT1 that was stock cammed... I have driven many, and have many friends with these cars of all years. Also I have never heard of anyone being restriced by the fuel injection setup on a 93, as in they had to switch to a 94+ to get it to run right, Make power, et al.
Kris93/95Z28 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2004, 08:26 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
O-taka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: somewhere in time
Posts: 98
94 and 95 Z28s have the nicest ***!
O-taka is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2004, 09:01 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
MTL_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 885
Originally posted by O-taka
94 and 95 Z28s have the nicest ***!
Actually to tell you the truth I really like the '97 tri-color tail lights...
MTL_Z28 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2004, 09:18 PM
  #39  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
kaoshen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 62
Don't forget 94+ had the 3.23 Gears on the 6 Speeds

And i think all years had 2.72s on the Autos
kaoshen is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2004, 09:27 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
whoa guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 113
Originally posted by shoebox
You mean after 1995. All 1995 LT1 f-bodies were OBD-I.
WRONG! Mine was OBDII. They switched to OBDII later half production. The earlier ones were OBDI
whoa guy is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2004, 09:28 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
scoobysnax83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 2,481
Originally posted by kaoshen
Don't forget 94+ had the 3.23 Gears on the 6 Speeds

And i think all years had 2.72s on the Autos
I have 3.73's
scoobysnax83 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-22-2004, 01:40 AM
  #42  
Registered User
 
MTL_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 885
Originally posted by kaoshen
Don't forget 94+ had the 3.23 Gears on the 6 Speeds

And i think all years had 2.72s on the Autos

I'm pretty sure the 94+ 6-speeds have 3.42's stock.
MTL_Z28 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-22-2004, 04:29 AM
  #43  
Registered User
 
BiGGinZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: California
Posts: 805
Originally posted by kaoshen
Don't forget 94+ had the 3.23 Gears on the 6 Speeds

And i think all years had 2.72s on the Autos
94+ autos had either 2.73's or 3.23's.
BiGGinZ is offline  
Reply
Old 04-22-2004, 05:45 AM
  #44  
Registered User
 
Mtrhds94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ... USA
Posts: 1,955
Originally posted by whoa guy
WRONG! Mine was OBDII. They switched to OBDII later half production. The earlier ones were OBDI
All 95's are OBD I.. They just have an OBD II 16 pin plug under the dash, which leads to the confusion..
Mtrhds94Z is offline  
Reply
Old 04-22-2004, 01:54 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
NOMAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Under my Car as usual :)
Posts: 1,327
Originally posted by whoa guy
WRONG! Mine was OBDII. They switched to OBDII later half production. The earlier ones were OBDI
Actually, all 1995 cars were OBDI with an OBDII hook up. All cars made in 1995 for the 96 years were OBDII

-Shannon
NOMAD is offline  
Reply



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: 1994 LT1 was the best Year


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.