Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
#32
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
LS1's can change their intake for the bolt-on records....
I sure hope we can I was planning on that being one of my mods for the bolt-on record....
Not like I will get their any time soon.
I sure hope we can I was planning on that being one of my mods for the bolt-on record....
Not like I will get their any time soon.
#33
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
Hey roadtrip, are you gonna be at the track this Sunday (march 20th)? Id really like to see that thing run. Also was it very hard to do your gear swap? Im thinkin my 78 TA needs some gears but I don't know anyone thats ever done it.
#34
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
Originally Posted by darkangel95
LS1's can change their intake for the bolt-on records....
I sure hope we can I was planning on that being one of my mods for the bolt-on record...
I sure hope we can I was planning on that being one of my mods for the bolt-on record...
Originally Posted by cc89formula
Hey roadtrip, are you gonna be at the track this Sunday (march 20th)? Id really like to see that thing run. Also was it very hard to do your gear swap? Im thinkin my 78 TA needs some gears but I don't know anyone thats ever done it.
#35
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
Sweet ill be there too, in the black 89 formula and ill be with the Top of Texas Trans Am group if you get a chance id like to talk to you and check out your car.
#37
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
Sar2k
how much Hp were you pushing when you set the record??
Race Weight??
How about a ruling on the Intake question, Are we, or arn't we allowed to have ported/aftermarket intakes????
I understood nothing oil based, except rockers, but the LS1 have them( I know the LS1's are not oil based). But i figured if you had one then the rest of us could run them if we chose. Just asking to clairify
how much Hp were you pushing when you set the record??
Race Weight??
How about a ruling on the Intake question, Are we, or arn't we allowed to have ported/aftermarket intakes????
I understood nothing oil based, except rockers, but the LS1 have them( I know the LS1's are not oil based). But i figured if you had one then the rest of us could run them if we chose. Just asking to clairify
#38
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
I don't see how an aftermarket intake would not be a 'bolt-on'. You aren't removing stock engine parts, and it doesn't require any machine work to the block, I fail to see how its any different than adding headers. Take off the old, bolt on the new. I don't see whats so hard about it.
#39
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
Originally Posted by TQdrivenws6
I don't see how an aftermarket intake would not be a 'bolt-on'. You aren't removing stock engine parts, and it doesn't require any machine work to the block, I fail to see how its any different than adding headers. Take off the old, bolt on the new. I don't see whats so hard about it.
#40
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
I suppose, but I see an intake manifold as an intake manifold. If you have to drain the oil or coolant to do a job I think thats going past a bolt on.
#41
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
Originally Posted by TQdrivenws6
If you have to drain the oil or coolant to do a job I think thats going past a bolt on.
I have not thought about the intake as an upgradeable part with the stock cam.....
#42
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
first..there are no intakes out there for the lt1. I would think converting to a SBC intake would kinda put the car in another class besides bolt on and the LTx from steve Q would get you nada on a stock motor. You really have to get up in the rpms to take advantage of his great design. But I think that if you wanted to do something to your stock intake and bolt it back on it should be allowed. Thats really kinda like free mods if you do something yourself. The ls1s are putting on the ls6 intake but we dont' have that kind of option since the lt4 doen't really work on a stock lt1 head.
#43
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
Originally Posted by 95Bird
first..there are no intakes out there for the lt1. I would think converting to a SBC intake would kinda put the car in another class besides bolt on and the LTx from steve Q would get you nada on a stock motor. You really have to get up in the rpms to take advantage of his great design. But I think that if you wanted to do something to your stock intake and bolt it back on it should be allowed. Thats really kinda like free mods if you do something yourself. The ls1s are putting on the ls6 intake but we dont' have that kind of option since the lt4 doen't really work on a stock lt1 head.
I think in the end it is our choice anyway, it is not like their is a committy to decide the rules for what is considered bolt-on. Maybe we should do a poll.
Last edited by darkangel95; 03-16-2005 at 02:26 PM.
#44
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
I've been following this thread with a little interest. Not that I'm going for "the record" or anything, just out of interest.
Anyway, perhaps "bolt-on" could be further clarified as exactly what it says: Bolt-ON. Someone mentioned a cam. That is a bolt-IN part. Pistons, rods and cranks are bolt-in parts. You can further clarify a non bolt-on part if it's something where you have to drain the oil and/or coolant and disassemble major components of the engine to install them and they sometimes (but not always) require machine work to work right. Heads would obviously fall under the catagory of non bolt-on.
However, if you classify something as not being a bolt-on because you have to drain coolant and/or oil, then technically you are going to have to exclude throttle bodies because in original form they have coolant running through them. And I think rockers are a gray area: They are wetted parts
Anyway, perhaps "bolt-on" could be further clarified as exactly what it says: Bolt-ON. Someone mentioned a cam. That is a bolt-IN part. Pistons, rods and cranks are bolt-in parts. You can further clarify a non bolt-on part if it's something where you have to drain the oil and/or coolant and disassemble major components of the engine to install them and they sometimes (but not always) require machine work to work right. Heads would obviously fall under the catagory of non bolt-on.
However, if you classify something as not being a bolt-on because you have to drain coolant and/or oil, then technically you are going to have to exclude throttle bodies because in original form they have coolant running through them. And I think rockers are a gray area: They are wetted parts
#45
Re: Bolt-On LT1 guys... who's shooting for the record???
Here is a bench race for everyone
I just beat a consistant cammed LT, 12.5 at 110mph , by two cars
From a 30 roll, he was close to track form. I was on 17x11 Zr1's, i have 15x3.5 pro stars and 245 nitto's for the track. He even has the same 1.86 60ft as me. Sounds like i need to take my little LT to a nice/ lower altitude track
MAd props Silver bullet, your car runs good
B-Rad
I just beat a consistant cammed LT, 12.5 at 110mph , by two cars
From a 30 roll, he was close to track form. I was on 17x11 Zr1's, i have 15x3.5 pro stars and 245 nitto's for the track. He even has the same 1.86 60ft as me. Sounds like i need to take my little LT to a nice/ lower altitude track
MAd props Silver bullet, your car runs good
B-Rad