Becca_007
03-28-2003, 08:49 AM
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=342260
I know there is some controversy about the new benchmark. People with cards that aren't capable of running the new tests at max get considerably lower scores. The overall scale has also been lowered. I think this is the bench for future games though, so let's see the numbers!
Yomama
03-28-2003, 09:51 AM
Becca, look in the street in front of your work. See any Tire marks? I took the SS out lastnight for a Spin.:D
Becca_007
03-28-2003, 10:47 AM
Lol... the road out there is pretty dirty and wet in some areas so I can't see anything permanent!
Yomama
03-28-2003, 11:49 AM
I'LL try harder next time.
Timberwolf
03-28-2003, 01:14 PM
Originally posted by Becca_007
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=342260
I know there is some controversy about the new benchmark. People with cards that aren't capable of running the new tests at max get considerably lower scores. The overall scale has also been lowered. I think this is the bench for future games though, so let's see the numbers!
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=506572
Edit: I just ran it again with the settings pushed a little harder and got 4031. I can't post the URL because it says I've done too many and need to buy the pro version first :D
Becca, our systems seem to only differ in the amount of RAM and the card clock speeds. If you use my URK there you'll see the settings I used for that score. For this new score I am using 378 core and 297 mem. For some reason I can't push it as hard in 3dmark03 as I can in 01. I run 385 and 310 there...