Jim S. '95 Z28
01-22-2003, 01:42 PM
Per ARP:
You will also note that ARP® offers specially undercut studs for several engines. This procedure (done only to the shorter studs) more equalizes the “stretch” of both studs, which makes for a more consistent clamping force—and one that compensates for head gasket compression when the cylinder heads are installed. This helps prevent blown head gaskets, and assures optimum engine sealing!
Unfortunately, ARP tech support isn't all that helpful regarding when they recommend stepping up to undercut studs from standard studs.
To the experts out there, how extreme must an application be to justify running them in a forced induction motor? Are we talkin' only in motors like Brady's (www.turbocharged.net) or in any motor where cylinder sealing (sans o-ringing) is a critical issue?
Note: this is with the same top end as the motor in the sig, but with lower CR and a maxed T-Trim blower.
TIA
You will also note that ARP® offers specially undercut studs for several engines. This procedure (done only to the shorter studs) more equalizes the “stretch” of both studs, which makes for a more consistent clamping force—and one that compensates for head gasket compression when the cylinder heads are installed. This helps prevent blown head gaskets, and assures optimum engine sealing!
Unfortunately, ARP tech support isn't all that helpful regarding when they recommend stepping up to undercut studs from standard studs.
To the experts out there, how extreme must an application be to justify running them in a forced induction motor? Are we talkin' only in motors like Brady's (www.turbocharged.net) or in any motor where cylinder sealing (sans o-ringing) is a critical issue?
Note: this is with the same top end as the motor in the sig, but with lower CR and a maxed T-Trim blower.
TIA