Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

VW unveils 282 mpg car (1.0L/100km)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 10:32 AM
  #1  
muckz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
VW unveils 282 mpg car (1.0L/100km)

http://www.wheels.ca/Article%20Category/article/781881

I don't think it's a plug-in hybrid. Beats Volt's 240 mpg rating.
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 10:36 AM
  #2  
95redLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Where does the 2nd person sit?


Old Sep 15, 2009 | 10:36 AM
  #3  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
282 miles per Imperial gallon
Not EPA miles per US gallon.
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 11:12 AM
  #4  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by 95redLT1
Where does the 2nd person sit?
My guess is that the 2nd person sits behind, not beside the person.

I also see that it is imperial gallon as well and that won't add up to be better than the Volts 240mpg. Also consider, that this car is still a concept. I kind of like the idea of having a small car like this, but I wonder about crash test ratings of a car that is so light.
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 01:08 PM
  #5  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
They've been working on that for quite a while. Do a goole search for older articles and photos.

You are all correct passenger sits behind driver.
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #6  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Originally Posted by muckz
Beats Volt's 240 mpg rating.
Aside from the "Imperial" rating difference, the Volt is an actual four+ passenger car for sale next year.
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 03:47 PM
  #7  
mdenz3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,173
No way in hell I would ever drive that thing.
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 07:12 PM
  #8  
texas94z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 374
From: Denton, Texas
Stupid...
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 08:46 PM
  #9  
TrackMagicWS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 374
Id drive it. My commute is 104 miles roundtrip. Make it VW
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 08:55 AM
  #10  
muckz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally Posted by jrp4uc
Aside from the "Imperial" rating difference, the Volt is an actual four+ passenger car for sale next year.
OK, I didn't realize it's in imperial gallons (it's about 235 mpg US), but having said that, Volt's numbers are pulled out of someone's ****. They're completely meaningless. You can go infinite miles per gallon in Volt, or you can go as low as 40 mpg if running from depleted batteries that are being charged by the gas engine.

So for VW to actually have a "car" (it's not much of a car, I agree) that is not a plug in hybrid and consistently gets 200+ mpg is a considerable achievement. This VW is more of a proof of concept I think.

If they could make it a 4 seater and if it still got 80+ mpg that would be better.
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 08:58 AM
  #11  
muckz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally Posted by texas94z
Stupid...
why?
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 09:41 AM
  #12  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by muckz
OK, I didn't realize it's in imperial gallons (it's about 235 mpg US), but having said that, Volt's numbers are pulled out of someone's ****. They're completely meaningless. You can go infinite miles per gallon in Volt, or you can go as low as 40 mpg if running from depleted batteries that are being charged by the gas engine.

So for VW to actually have a "car" (it's not much of a car, I agree) that is not a plug in hybrid and consistently gets 200+ mpg is a considerable achievement. This VW is more of a proof of concept I think.

If they could make it a 4 seater and if it still got 80+ mpg that would be better.
Actually, I have done some reading from different places, it seems that goal was 1.0L/100km, it doesn't appear that they have achieved that. Some sites say they got 1.2L/100km and other say 1.38L/100km and I read another that said 1.49L/100km. This brings the mileage to 196mpg to 170mpg or 157mpg.

Either way, the mileage is impressive, but there is little to no storage space, and we haven't seen a crash test rating for this car. I am afraid this car would get flattened on a US highway.
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 10:04 AM
  #13  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
If we are talking concepts then I would rather have the Opel Eco-Speedster

During initial testing the 112 hp concept car reached a maximum speed of more than 155 mph while fuel consumption on the combined cycle was an incredible 113 mpg.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AlaskaZ28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
9
Jan 1, 2015 12:30 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 3, 2014 12:30 PM
The Seer
Classic Engine Tech
2
Nov 26, 2014 05:55 PM
USAirman93
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
Nov 24, 2014 03:37 PM
MIGHTYMOUSE
Car Audio and Electronics
5
Aug 29, 2002 09:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 PM.