Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Katech Corvette Z06 ClubSport - An alternative to the mighty ZR1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 12:36 PM
  #1  
geetee500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 9
Katech Corvette Z06 ClubSport - An alternative to the mighty ZR1?

I think it looks a heckuva lot better, and hard to argue with 1.12g's on the skidpad.

Katech Corvette Z06 ClubSport


Gravity isn’t one of those things most people think much about. We bet you’d notice, though, if it suddenly increased 10 or 15 percent or shifted polarity and pulled you, say, to the east instead of down. Imagine this (but don’t actually do it): take the chair you’re sitting in right now and bolt its feet to a roof that slants at a 45-degree angle. Now try sitting in it. What you’d be experiencing is approximately what someone feels in a car cornering at 1.00 g.

We measure cornering ability in fractions of a g—1.00 g is earth’s gravitational pull on you at sea level—and to street cars, a full g of cornering is what a 400-lb bench-press is to the average gym rat. In the last year or so, we have tested 210 cars, only a handful of which have met or exceeded 1.00 g on the skidpad: we spotted a Viper SRT10 at an even 1.00 g, a Corvette Z06 at 1.03, a Viper ACR at 1.08, and now this Katech Corvette Z06 ClubSport at an astonishing 1.12 g. The only car we’ve tested in the last year that bests that number was a Porsche 911 GT3 Cup—a purpose-built race car—with a 1.16.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...y_file?cid=336
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 12:46 PM
  #2  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Those wheels are horrible looking, IMO. At least in pics. I believe it also has a bunch of vents in the hood that are not very appealing IMO.



EDIT: Uh, wouldn't it feel like 1.00 g if the chair were turned completely sideways (i.e. rotated 90 degrees from verticle)?
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #3  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
EDIT: Uh, wouldn't it feel like 1.00 g if the chair were turned completely sideways (i.e. rotated 90 degrees from verticle)?
Yeah, but then you're missing the normal (vertical) component that you feel in a vehicle during a 1.00g corner.

Bolting a chair to a 45-degree surface would similar a car that has a nominal limit of 1.00g but then decreased the Earth's gravity to 0.717g (ignoring, of course, a variety of tire non-linearities including the effects of the mechanical strength of the tread).

</geek>

It'd be very interesting to see the skidpad numbers on a dead-stock Z06 if one simply swapped out the stock tires for some really sticky DOT-legal autocross rubber (Kumho V710 or Hoosier A6).
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 02:44 PM
  #4  
Northwest94Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 511
From: Mill Creek, WA
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
Yeah, but then you're missing the normal (vertical) component that you feel in a vehicle during a 1.00g corner.

Bolting a chair to a 45-degree surface would similar a car that has a nominal limit of 1.00g but then decreased the Earth's gravity to 0.717g (ignoring, of course, a variety of tire non-linearities including the effects of the mechanical strength of the tread).

</geek>

It'd be very interesting to see the skidpad numbers on a dead-stock Z06 if one simply swapped out the stock tires for some really sticky DOT-legal autocross rubber (Kumho V710 or Hoosier A6).
That's a number I would love to see as well.
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #5  
KyleW93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 113
From: Ft Collins, Colorado
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
Those wheels are horrible looking, IMO. At least in pics. I believe it also has a bunch of vents in the hood that are not very appealing IMO.



EDIT: Uh, wouldn't it feel like 1.00 g if the chair were turned completely sideways (i.e. rotated 90 degrees from verticle)?
I really like the wheels, ive been looking for something like that for my camaro.
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 03:27 PM
  #6  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
Originally Posted by Northwest94Z
That's a number I would love to see as well.
What's stopping you?

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Sizes....osier&model=A6

Old Oct 15, 2008 | 04:13 PM
  #7  
Chewbacca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 859
From: AR (PA born and fled)
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
\It'd be very interesting to see the skidpad numbers on a dead-stock Z06 if one simply swapped out the stock tires for some really sticky DOT-legal autocross rubber (Kumho V710 or Hoosier A6).
Well if big ol' ugly cars similar to mine can pull 1.3 steady state g's (peak g's in excess of 1.4) on a surface like HPT.......

I say "similar" because I don't actually have a datalogger in my car but know the results of those that do.



ESP is fun until you have to pay that annual / bi-annual tire bill.
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #8  
Northwest94Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 511
From: Mill Creek, WA
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
Tires is the easy part. How does one go about accurately measuring sustained g's. I don't trust my built in G-meter as scientific.
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #9  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
Originally Posted by Chewbacca
Well if big ol' ugly cars similar to mine can pull 1.3 steady state g's (peak g's in excess of 1.4) on a surface like HPT.......

I say "similar" because I don't actually have a datalogger in my car but know the results of those that do.
I've got a datalogger, and have seen 1.19g on Kumho V700s during steady-state cornering. Some people without dataloggers have told me that this isn't a "real" number

ESP is fun until you have to pay that annual / bi-annual tire bill.
My personal research suggests that the situation does not improve when you have a car that weighs 4348 lbs with driver + fuel.
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 04:54 PM
  #10  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
Originally Posted by Northwest94Z
Tires is the easy part. How does one go about accurately measuring sustained g's. I don't trust my built in G-meter as scientific.
http://racepak.com/

I'm currently running an older V300 + an older G2X. Only the latter is necessary for autocross and road course work (the V300 works best for drag racing). Less than $1000 will get you up and running. The toughest part of the installation for you would be finding a flat level spot for the main ECU, and figuring out how to mount the magnetic GPS antenna on your roof
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 05:25 PM
  #11  
SSCamaro99_3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,179
From: Ballwin, MO
I like it, except for the ClubSport decal.
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 07:33 PM
  #12  
Chewbacca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 859
From: AR (PA born and fled)
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
Some people without dataloggers have told me that this isn't a "real" number
Jealousy? Can't imagine what they mean by that. Maybe because it wasn't measured on a "standard" 300 ft skid pad? Who cares? It's not like we're using aero to generate that grip.


Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
My personal research suggests that the situation does not improve when you have a car that weighs 4348 lbs with driver + fuel.
Ouch. That's exactly 963 lbs more than mine. *EDIT* Without its fat driver *EDIT* 1.17 is a pretty good number for a car that big on only V700s.

What do you run for tires? 335s all the way around?

Naturally I run the ESP standard on all four corners. 315 Hoosier A6s on CCW Classics.

Last edited by Chewbacca; Oct 16, 2008 at 08:51 AM. Reason: clarity
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 10:37 PM
  #13  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Northwest94Z
Tires is the easy part. How does one go about accurately measuring sustained g's. I don't trust my built in G-meter as scientific.
The easy way is to mark out a circle of known diameter (100-300 meters is typical for magazines). Get the car going around the circle as quickly as it can, and time the laps. Take your best lap, or the average of your best three, or however you want to do it, and then it's just a matter of doing the math.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 08:07 AM
  #14  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
The easy way is to mark out a circle of known diameter (100-300 meters is typical for magazines). Get the car going around the circle as quickly as it can, and time the laps. Take your best lap, or the average of your best three, or however you want to do it, and then it's just a matter of doing the math.
The math is easy (just a matter of doing the proper unit conversion and using V^2/R), but driving a car at its absolute limit around a large skidpad is an extremely difficult task! And don't forget the tire wear. On a grippy surface with soft tires on a heavy car, just a few laps might wipe out a set of tires

BTW - the factory G-meter on the Vette should be very accurate - it's tied into the accelerometer that's part of the stability control system (probably one of Analog Device's two-axis parts with a range of +/- 1.8G). The biggest issues are that the data isn't stored in any sort of easily-accessable form, there's probably some filtering going on that might yield slightly lower numbers in transient situations, and the update rate probably isn't quite fast enough to prevent aliasing issues. Using an aftermarket data logger simply makes it easier to collect and analyze the data.

Originally Posted by Chewbacca
Jealousy? Can't imagine what they mean by that. Maybe because it wasn't measured on a "standard" 300 ft skid pad? Who cares? It's not like we're using aero to generate that grip.
Too many folks think that they "know" exactly how hard any car can corner by doing a quick comparison to their mental database of magazine test numbers. Yeah, a stock-suspension Impala SS on BFG all-seasons at the stock tire pressure of 30 PSI only does 0.80-0.82g. There's a big difference between that and a highly-modified car on sticky race tires, but good luck explaining that to someone who's never quantitatively measured the performance of a vehicle.

I run 275/40s up front and 315/35s out back. If I ever switch to the V710 or A6, I'll run a 295/35 in the front. Trying to stuff a 315 in the front fenderwheels is too much effort for a car that frankly isn't going to ever be competitive in Street Mod.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 10:24 AM
  #15  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by robvas
Just get out your lasers for timing and measuring distance...
With a reasonably large skidpad, small errors in timing won't have a big effect on the resulting g-force calculation. A handheld stopwatch should do the trick.

Originally Posted by robvas
Wouldn't a batter idea be to hang a scale from the inside of a car and put a small weight on the end of it? Lets say it's a 1kg weight. If the scale goes to say....1.2 kg you have made 1.2 g, right?
That would work reasonably well if you could hang the scale on a totally rigid structure so that it never moved or rotated.

How do you plan on reading the scale while driving?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.