Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

New Jetta (60mpg)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 09:59 AM
  #1  
indieaz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 915
From: Tucson, AZ
New Jetta (60mpg)

The '09 Jetta due this summer apparently gets 60mpg highway with a TDI making 138hp and 236 lb-ft. That's a big deal...the gas mileage of a hybrid without the batteries and weight. And it's probably faster than a prius (and definitely looks better than one).

Also the price beats a Prius if the article is right. Coming in a hair under $20,000.

http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/04/coming-soon-to.html
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 10:04 AM
  #2  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
That is really nice, the only problem now is that diesel (at least in my area) is well over $4 a gallon now (I've seen it for as much as 4.50). Regular is hovering around 3.60. Seems we're right back at the "hybrid cost up front vs. traditional powertrain cost down the road" comparison.
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 10:09 AM
  #3  
shock6906's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,577
From: Sandy VJJville
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
That is really nice, the only problem now is that diesel (at least in my area) is well over $4 a gallon now (I've seen it for as much as 4.50). Regular is hovering around 3.60. Seems we're right back at the "hybrid cost up front vs. traditional powertrain cost down the road" comparison.
That does suck that diesel is so expensive now, but I wonder what the gas mileage is of other cars in that price range that run on unleaded gasoline. It's possible that you would still come out ahead even with diesel considering that the gas mileage is so high on that VW.
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 11:40 AM
  #4  
Todd80Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 439
From: Northern VA
87 octane is $3.45 here. Diesel is $4.29. That brings the advantage down to 48mpg.

Now, let's amortize the $2000 price premium over a 7-year period (let's call that the typical ownership length). That's $285/year that I'd have to spend on gas, which would buy me 82 gallons.

Let's assume an all-highway scenario for the year, and use the 60mpg highway. That's 250gal a year, or $1072.50 in fuel.
Let's assume the "plain ole" Jetta gets 35mpg highway. That's 428gal/year- 82gal/year in the additional cost = 346gal or $1193/year.

So, when it's all said and done, you'll save $10/month at current rates by going with the diesel. That's assuming the diesel will actually hit 60mpg, and the gas version will only hit 35mpg.

Did I do that right?

That's impressive nonetheless. It's too bad the diesel refiners have found another opportunity to grab at our wallets.
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #5  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
I truely believe that we're going to move to a point where diesels will become the answer over hybrids or alternate fuels. Diesel fuel contains the highest amount of energy, diesel engines produce high levels of torque despite modest horsepower, and achieves high fuel economy.

I suspect it's going to be easier and cheaper to adjust fuel production to produce more diesel (either voluntarily or with mandates) and to play with fuel tax rates or tax breaks to favor diesels over gasoline powered vehicles than it's going to be to set up manufacturing and distribution of E85, Ethonol, or set up a network of natural gas stations or even engineer electric cars that equal the cruising range of today's gas powered vehicles.


But what also needs to be understood is that the purpose of CAFE is to reduce our oil usage, NOT to save you money.

"Estimating down" fuel economy by adjusting for the price difference of diesel is useful only for your pocketbook. A vehicle that gets 60 mpg doesn't care if diesel is $4 per gallon or $400 per gallon. The point is that you use less fuel going from point "A" to point "B", which means less need for oil.

Last edited by guionM; Apr 27, 2008 at 12:21 PM.
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #6  
DAKMOR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,406
From: Philaduhphia
Originally Posted by guionM
But what also needs to be understood is that the purpose of CAFE is to reduce our oil usage, NOT to save you money.

HAHAHAH! Have you people never heard me say that oil usage will not drop, but rather be steady or increase due to the cheapness of the fuel since it goes 2x as fars as it used to.
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 08:19 PM
  #7  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
Why did diesel used to be much closer in price to regular 87 octane gas and why is it now ~10% more expensive than premium gas?

60 mpg sounds great... even with a 20% premium over 87. VW reliability doesn't sound great, though.

Honda has a diesel coming out in the Accord fairly soon - maybe they also plan to put it in the Civic?

GM have any small car diesel plans anytime soon?
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 08:45 PM
  #8  
Todd80Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 439
From: Northern VA
"Estimating down" fuel economy by adjusting for the price difference of diesel is useful only for your pocketbook.
Wait a minute. I just used the anti-hybrid argument, but it's not allowed for diesels??
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 08:51 PM
  #9  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by Threxx
Why did diesel used to be much closer in price to regular 87 octane gas and why is it now ~10% more expensive than premium gas?
Diesel is getting more scarce; simple supply and demand. Refineries can be built many different ways, and how they are built will determine how much Diesel and gasoline are produced from a barrel of oil. North American refineries have typically maximized gasoline production, while European refineries have maximized Diesel production. In recent years European's new vehicle mix has been over 50% Diesel, straining even their Diesel-biased capacity, such that Europe now has a relative surplus of gasoline and has been exporting it to NA. Meanwhile NA's Diesel demand has not fallen off like its gasoline demand (trucks and trains have to run regardless of the price of fuel) so Diesel has been in short supply coming out of our refineries too. Thus overall, Diesel is becoming scarce and prices have risen accordingly.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 10:40 AM
  #10  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Its actually supply and demand. If more vehicles required diesel fuel, production would have to be increased and the price would come down accordingly. IMHO biodiesel is the answer. It is far easier and cheaper to make biodiesel over ethanol. In my area today diesel is $4.39 /gal where biodiesel is $4.59 /gal. However biodiesel is far scarcer and harder to come by. Increase biodiesel production and again the prices would drop accordingly.

I'm hoping manufacturers catch on sooner than later.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 10:58 AM
  #11  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by jg95z28
If more vehicles required diesel fuel, production would have to be increased and the price would come down accordingly.
It's actually not that simple. Once a refinery is built, it's not easy to make significant changes in the relative output of the various types of fuel. NA refineries simply cannot make much more Diesel, and Europe is already maxed out. Thus we're not likely to see much relief on the supply side of Diesel.

edit: a better explanation from http://www.caranddriver.com/features...t_of_it_column

Al Mannato, a fuel-issues manager at API, explains that oil refineries tend to fall into two categories: catalytic cracking and hydrocracking. Most U.S. refineries are set up for catalytic cracking, which turns each barrel of crude oil into about 50-percent gasoline, 15-percent diesel, and the remainder into jet fuel, home heating oil, heavy fuel oil, liquefied petroleum gas, asphalt, and various other products. In Europe and most of the rest of the world, refineries use a hydrocracking process, which produces more like 25-percent gasoline and 25-percent diesel from that barrel of oil. So the rest of the world is already maximizing diesel production. In fact, despite using a refining strategy that minimizes the production of gasoline, Europe still ends up with too much of the stuff, so it exports it to America—about one of every eight gallons of gasoline that we consume.

Meanwhile, Americans are already using most of the diesel fuel that our refineries produce, so if sales of diesel cars take off, keeping the diesel flowing here will put further demands on tight worldwide diesel supplies and probably cause the price to rise even more. Our oil industry could, of course, start converting its refineries from catalytic to hydrocracking and start producing more diesel and less gasoline.

Doing so—and here’s the Catch-22—would reduce the output of gasoline and likely increase its price. Moreover, such a switch, Mannato explains, amounts to a major refinery change that would take 5 to 10 years to accomplish. Building some new hydrocracking refineries would add diesel capacity without squeezing gasoline supplies, but due to their nearly universal unpopularity, there hasn’t been a new refinery built in America since 1979.

Last edited by R377; Apr 28, 2008 at 03:15 PM.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:11 AM
  #12  
Todd80Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 439
From: Northern VA
Where did the sudden North American diesel demand come from? We've not had a massive inrush of diesel vehicles onto the market. Sure, trucking miles are up incrementally, and I'm sure the clean diesel requirement had some to do with it, but a 25% additional increase beyond what gas has done makes no sense.

I cannot help but feel that the market price is being manipulated.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:11 AM
  #13  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by R377
It's actually not that simple. Once a refinery is built, it's not easy to make significant changes in the relative output of the various types of fuel. NA refineries simply cannot make much more Diesel, and Europe is already maxed out. Thus we're not likely to see much relief on the supply side of Diesel.
Obviously we'd need to build more refineries or expand existing ones. The same holds true if we are going to switch to ethanol, hydrogen, etc. You need to build the infrastructure to support the changes in the vehicles. So technically, it is that simple, it just requires huge start-up costs.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:52 AM
  #14  
cjmatt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 983
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by guionM
I truely believe that we're going to move to a point where diesels will become the answer over hybrids or alternate fuels. Diesel fuel contains the highest amount of energy, diesel engines produce high levels of torque despite modest horsepower, and achieves high fuel economy.
I think ford ecoboost will get near diesel economy and power w/o diesel. The combo of both direct injection and turbocharging seems to be a worthy contender
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 12:54 PM
  #15  
Flip94ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 610
From: Akron, OH.
Couple things, is more oil based than gas, when oil goes up diesel is more likely to follow suite, supply issues are also starting to pop-up as mentioned.

None of us knows what gas or diesel will cost in the future so guesstimating costs over 7 years is hopeless. Its a dice roll.

There are also alot of varibles like miles driven. Where did you get the 35 mpg figure for the gas jetta? Two coworkers both own 5 cylinder autos and neither has gotten more than 30 mpg highway. In real world metro usage one averages 23 mpg and the other 25mpg. I do think the diesel can do alot better in town like double the gas mpgs, the diesel usage in heavy traffic like idleing is very low like 1/3 as much fuel. On the highway it can also double mpgs over the gas version. At todays prices the diesels return could be pretty good in real world driving. And fuel prices very signifigantly by locale, I pay $3.60 for gas and $4 for diesel here. I drive about 30,000 highway miles a year. My savings would be $1500 a year at todays prices. If the TDI is a $2000 option my payback is in 16 months. If I drove 10000 miles a year my payback would be four years.

So what are the odds that one of us will be able to go to the local VW dealership and pick-up a tdi for under $20,000. My personal experience with a local dealer was that they wanted $27 or 29K for the last two tdi's they had in stock. That makes it pull even with the prius in cost

Biodiesel is a great answer, when I worked for USPS I was putting B20 in my mail truck, great stuff. Grown in the the USA, refined in the USA, blended in the USA and the money spent is kept in the USA. And it burned clean. I was told regular diesel is about 60% foreign oil 40% domestic, replacing that 20% with US product is great. I really wish the farm lobby pushed for biodiesel as much as the did for E85, Wall street and the consumer have figured out that E85 is a bad product, atleast in todays flexfuel vehicles. I just saw on CNBC that corn ethanol subsidies will be lowered and Cellouse subsidies will be on the table per the new farm bill.

BTW the average 1st owner time with a new car is 3.xx years.

.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 AM.