Supporting Vendor Index    -    Advertising Information
PDA

3.4 info?

94TeALFiReBiRd
12-12-2002, 12:57 PM
give me as much stock info as possible.... 1/4 0-60 etc..... engine things compression stock cam everything possible about the 3.4
ibanez6rg
12-12-2002, 03:18 PM
drivetrain/front engine, rear-wheel drive
engine code/L32
compression ratio/9.0:1
displacement(liters,c.i.d.)/3.4L, 207
hp-rpm/160 @ 4600
torque-rpm/200 @ 3600
fuel induction/SFI (sequential fuel injection)
fuel injectors/24lb
Tiago
12-12-2002, 06:32 PM
the injecctors are 17lb! ;)
Ve/\/om
12-12-2002, 08:53 PM
The 3.4 DOHC is better!!! I know...mid 15's vs. high 17's :p
ibanez6rg
12-12-2002, 09:13 PM
Originally posted by Tiago
the injecctors are 17lb! ;)

You sure?? :)
V6 Punk 93
12-12-2002, 09:26 PM
Originally posted by Ve/\/om
The 3.4 DOHC is better!!! I know...mid 15's vs. high 17's :p

High 17's? Maybe a few poorly tuned 3.4's are running high 17's but most of them I see are running mid-high 16's.
94GrayV6
12-12-2002, 10:43 PM
This should help... http://engine.firebirdv6.com/

Oh yeah typical stock acceleration times are 0-60 in 9ish and 1/4 in the high 16s.
Ve/\/om
12-13-2002, 01:47 PM
Originally posted by 94GrayV6
This should help... http://engine.firebirdv6.com/

Oh yeah typical stock acceleration times are 0-60 in 9ish and 1/4 in the high 16s. http://wp.netscape.com/fishcam/fishcam.html
MustangEater82
12-13-2002, 02:22 PM
Originally posted by Ve/\/om
The 3.4 DOHC is better!!! I know...mid 15's vs. high 17's :p

the dohc 3.4L is very unreliable, likes to eat alternators, break timing chains, and a huge long list.... Very expensive to maintain.


THe 3.4L has cast aluminum pistons.... which is a downfall when it comes to severely tuning it.

3.4L are typically high 16s..


and hey my 3.4L is mid 15s:)
94TeALFiReBiRd
12-13-2002, 02:31 PM
yea i know someone with a 3.4 lumina z34 always messes up.......
All_InTheRED
12-13-2002, 02:59 PM
Originally posted by V6 Punk 93
High 17's? Maybe a few poorly tuned 3.4's are running high 17's but most of them I see are running mid-high 16's.

And some very well maintained ones that run 17.8.

.......and I have seen others do the same at the same track.
fbird95
12-13-2002, 08:03 PM
the dohc 3.4 Certainly does go along with the general scheme of grand am engines being unreliable.
94TeALFiReBiRd
12-14-2002, 01:10 AM
Originally posted by fbird95
the dohc 3.4 Certainly does go along with the general scheme of grand am engines being unreliable. yea so true they suck!!!!
Ve/\/om
12-16-2002, 12:14 PM
Originally posted by MustangEater82
the dohc 3.4L is very unreliable, likes to eat alternators, break timing chains, and a huge long list.... Very expensive to maintain.


THe 3.4L has cast aluminum pistons.... which is a downfall when it comes to severely tuning it.

3.4L are typically high 16s..


and hey my 3.4L is mid 15s:)

Unreliable? Not really if well maintained....and there timing belt engines. ALL dohc 3.4's are forged aluminum rods/pistons.