Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GT-R weight and HP/Tq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 10:49 AM
  #1  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
GT-R weight and HP/Tq

http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl.../71017001/1065

473-hp, 433-lb-ft

Curb Weight: 3792 pounds

I hope the Camaro is lighter than that.

Last edited by Z28x; Oct 17, 2007 at 11:23 AM.
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 10:54 AM
  #2  
Silverado C-10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,897
From: Greenville, SC
Doubt it, but it sure will look a lot better
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 10:56 AM
  #3  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
*Yawn*.

Corvette-Killer it ain't.

Earlier, Mizuno-san had offered some lap times from the Nordschliefe for various cars driven by the German magazine SportAuto. Those times are driver-dependent, track-knowledge-dependent, weather-, traffic- and bunny-crossing-the-track dependent. But Mizuno suggested the GT-R could get anywhere from 7:44 on up, with most laps coming in between 7:55 and 7:58. So he suggested the GT-R's strong suit was that it offered "the best cost per lap time." For whatever that's worth.
I see no mention of a 7:38 lap time around the Nordschliefe. They only say "7:44 on up." I'm betting the car won't crack 7:40.

Last edited by skorpion317; Oct 17, 2007 at 11:03 AM.
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 10:56 AM
  #4  
Evilfrog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 750
From: Alton IL
And cost about a third of the price.
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 11:11 AM
  #5  
Silverado C-10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,897
From: Greenville, SC
Does this thing look like 3 or 4 different cars pieced together to anyone else? Nothing really looks like it flows...
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #6  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Prediction: Z51 performance at twice the price.

If it is built in Japan then the price might be higher come May '08 as the dollar falls against the Yen
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #7  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
The curb weight is disapointing. It will be a fast and powerful car but I'd hold back on giving it a supercar title. It's not in the F430 or Gallardo range and maybe that was not the point. But with all the hype it was just made out to be the best car ever.

It's interesting how Nissan is pushing the price per lap and low cost of this car. It's in the Z06, Viper, and 911 range and seems to offer similar performance so I don't see what is so special.

Last edited by 99SilverSS; Oct 17, 2007 at 01:01 PM.
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 12:55 PM
  #8  
93Phoenix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 392
From: Roch, NY
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
It's interesting how Nissan is pushing the price per lab and low cost of this car. It's in the Z06, Viper, and 911 range and seems to offer similar performance so I don't see what is so special.
IT'S A SKYLINE U NUB

Old Oct 17, 2007 | 01:24 PM
  #9  
Chris_Doane's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 401
Originally Posted by 93Phoenix
IT'S A SKYLINE U NUB
Actually the correct way to say that would've been...

"It'S TeH skyzline u nOOb!!"

Old Oct 17, 2007 | 01:52 PM
  #10  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by Z28x
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl.../71017001/1065

473-hp, 433-lb-ft

Curb Weight: 3792 pounds

I hope the Camaro is lighter than that.
I doubt if the top Camaro uses a supercharged V8 that it will be any lighter. Shelby's GT500 is nearly 3900 pounds, and I doubt the same size Camaro would be much more than 100 to 200 pounds lighter (though I'd worry that it would be more fragile then the Shelby).

Lots of horsepower + lots of torque + durability = lots of weight.
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 01:58 PM
  #11  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by 93Phoenix
IT'S A SKYLINE U NUB

Sorry I forgot;
Greatest inventions known to man,
1. Wheel
2. Turbo
3. V-Tech
4. NOS
5. Skyline
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 02:13 PM
  #12  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
Sorry I forgot;
Greatest inventions known to man,
1. Wheel
2. Turbo
3. V-Tech
4. NOS
5. Skyline


I think you have that list inverted though...
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 04:02 PM
  #13  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by skorpion317
I see no mention of a 7:38 lap time around the Nordschliefe. They only say "7:44 on up." I'm betting the car won't crack 7:40.
Yes that is quite interesting. But then again this does seem to be for the base car which only costs $70,000.
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 04:13 PM
  #14  
KLee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 370
From: Honolulu, Hi USA
Originally Posted by skorpion317
*Yawn*.

Corvette-Killer it ain't.



I see no mention of a 7:38 lap time around the Nordschliefe. They only say "7:44 on up." I'm betting the car won't crack 7:40.
skorpion317 has spoken the correct.
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 04:15 PM
  #15  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by KLee
skorpion317 has spoken the correct.
I try



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 PM.