Camshaft LCA statements within. ARE THEY CORRECT?
Camshaft LCA statements within. ARE THEY CORRECT?
Given two single pattern cams with different LCA's on a blown engine. (108 & 116)
1. 116 cam will have later intake open/close
2. 116 cam will have earlier exhaust open/close
3. 116 cam will have decreased overlap
4. 116 cam will have snappier throttle response
Now, make the 116 cam a split pattern with 14 more degrees exhaust duration (from 224 to 238)
1. later exhaust closing point
2. Increased exhaust efficiency to make up for "weak" or "overpacked" exhaust ports.
3. slight increase in overlap intake to exhuast
4. Will maintain crisp throttle response due to later intake timing.
All installed straight up for their respective lca's.
Oh, and.......
1. The decrease in overlap would be 16 degrees going from 108 to 116.
BUT, HOW MUCH WOULD BE PUT BACK WITH THE INCREASE IN EXHAUST DURATION???????
1. 116 cam will have later intake open/close
2. 116 cam will have earlier exhaust open/close
3. 116 cam will have decreased overlap
4. 116 cam will have snappier throttle response
Now, make the 116 cam a split pattern with 14 more degrees exhaust duration (from 224 to 238)
1. later exhaust closing point
2. Increased exhaust efficiency to make up for "weak" or "overpacked" exhaust ports.
3. slight increase in overlap intake to exhuast
4. Will maintain crisp throttle response due to later intake timing.
All installed straight up for their respective lca's.
Oh, and.......
1. The decrease in overlap would be 16 degrees going from 108 to 116.
BUT, HOW MUCH WOULD BE PUT BACK WITH THE INCREASE IN EXHAUST DURATION???????
Re: Camshaft LCA statements within. ARE THEY CORRECT?
Originally posted by ToddR
All installed straight up for their respective lca's.
Oh, and.......
1. The decrease in overlap would be 16 degrees going from 108 to 116.
BUT, HOW MUCH WOULD BE PUT BACK WITH THE INCREASE IN EXHAUST DURATION???????
All installed straight up for their respective lca's.
Oh, and.......
1. The decrease in overlap would be 16 degrees going from 108 to 116.
BUT, HOW MUCH WOULD BE PUT BACK WITH THE INCREASE IN EXHAUST DURATION???????
are you saying that the cam's LSA is going to change totally, or are you going to change the ECL?
I always thought that the overlap was the reason for the throttle response and not the LSA, but they are directly related.
Bret
I'm thinkin it's the decrease in overlap too??? But the intake installed centeline seems to have alot to do with it also. Just trying to figure this stuff out...........
What's your take?
What's your take?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



