New GTS dyno numbers

HP: 445.9
TQ: 471.96


No mods, just wish these cars came with some gearing.

RSI car with 16miles (http://www.viperalley.com/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/574962/page/0/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/1)

That is pretty much what the Viper has been dynoing since 2003 anyway, so no shock there.

Isn't there a thread going on right now, saying that these cars as suppost to have more than the z06's?

I just read a thread this morning where a new Z06 bone stock did 453, they even posted the dyno graph, but I can't remember which site it was on.

Anyway ya look at it though , the dodge boys will need to do a bit more than just match the output of the Z06 . Its got that lil weight diff to make up too ;) Not knockin the Viper by any means ...its still an amazing car , but the Z06 is gonna be putting the new GTS on the trailer too .

Isn't there a thread going on right now, saying that these cars as suppost to have more than the z06's?
They probably meant area under the curve. The torque peak on the Vipers dyno sheet is 1 lb-ft higher than the Z06's is rated at the crank. I wouldnt be suprised at all if the powercurve of Dodge's V10 was broader.

I just read a thread this morning where a new Z06 bone stock did 453, they even posted the dyno graph, but I can't remember which site it was on.

I am sure with only a 5hp difference in the rating of the two engines, there will be a few z06 engines that dyno higher than Viper engines due to variances in the engines.

They probably meant area under the curve. The torque peak on the Vipers dyno sheet is 1 lb-ft higher than the Z06's is rated at the crank. I wouldnt be suprised at all if the powercurve of Dodge's V10 was broader.

I would be suprised if the Viper's torque curve wasn't significantly broader than the z06s.