How much more drivetrain loss from auto? Worth buying another car over?
How much more drivetrain loss from auto? Worth buying another car over?
OK. First off, This is based completely on performance. I could care less If i have an A4 or M6. Ive been bitten HARD by the bug this year and Im gonna start modding beyond my lid and cutout.
Im thinking about going through a heck of a lot of trouble to sell my car and buy pretty much the same car I have now except have it be stick.
Is it worth it? Is the performance difference even there if I get a torque converter?
Im thinking about going through a heck of a lot of trouble to sell my car and buy pretty much the same car I have now except have it be stick.
Is it worth it? Is the performance difference even there if I get a torque converter?
Re: How much more drivetrain loss from auto? Worth buying another car over?
No matter what anyone says I don't think there is that much performance difference between the two M6 vs A4.
I have now had both 2002 A4 and my 2000 M6 w/SLP Cat-Back. There will be a little more RWHP soaked up by the A4 but gear ratios and faster shifts make up for that.
I have now had both 2002 A4 and my 2000 M6 w/SLP Cat-Back. There will be a little more RWHP soaked up by the A4 but gear ratios and faster shifts make up for that.
Re: How much more drivetrain loss from auto? Worth buying another car over?
I think an auto loses 1-2% more then a manual transmission. With a higher stall this may be lowered but I'm not positive. Theres really no need to sell you car if you are happy with either transmission, just upgrade the auto to handle more power.
Re: How much more drivetrain loss from auto? Worth buying another car over?
If two equal drivers were drag racing two equal cars except for one being the Auto and being the M6, most likely the M6 would win. However, the driver of the M6 would need a flawless launch and near perfect shifting. Its really, really hard to miss a shift with an auto tranny.
When I was looking to buy a Z28, I thought I must have the M6 but couldn't find one that didn't have a ton of mods done to it and if wasn't modified, I couldn't afford it. The autos are much easier to find and now after having it for many years, I don't regret it one bit. Driving in the city sucks with a manual.
When I was looking to buy a Z28, I thought I must have the M6 but couldn't find one that didn't have a ton of mods done to it and if wasn't modified, I couldn't afford it. The autos are much easier to find and now after having it for many years, I don't regret it one bit. Driving in the city sucks with a manual.
Re: How much more drivetrain loss from auto? Worth buying another car over?
In general the difference between an auto and a manual tranny is roughly 5%. Manuals do have more efficient drivetrains and so conserve more of the power getting to the ground.
HOWEVER, automatic trannies are the easiest to make go fast. Easier to launch, no worries about misshifts.
Auto for track racing, Manual for joyriding and races from a roll.
HOWEVER, automatic trannies are the easiest to make go fast. Easier to launch, no worries about misshifts.
Auto for track racing, Manual for joyriding and races from a roll.
Re: How much more drivetrain loss from auto? Worth buying another car over?
If you aren't shifting, you aren't driving.
Autos are boring and the 4L60E isn't the best transmission for high-horsepower longevity, either.
Mike
Autos are boring and the 4L60E isn't the best transmission for high-horsepower longevity, either.
Mike
Re: How much more drivetrain loss from auto? Worth buying another car over?
Originally Posted by Kraest
If you aren't shifting, you aren't driving.
Autos are boring and the 4L60E isn't the best transmission for high-horsepower longevity, either.
Mike
Autos are boring and the 4L60E isn't the best transmission for high-horsepower longevity, either.
Mike
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



