After Modifying My VE Tables, I Still Run Rich!!!!
What gives when I reduce my VE tables so I should be at 128 BLM's and then the car reads a rich condition and starts immediately lowering them. Within 20 min I am at 108 again at idle.
I have done 8 iterations of adjusting my VE tables based upon the rich condition and have gone from the stock VE of somewhere in the 40's to now the low 21's for the idle blocks (800 RPM/ 20-30 KPA).
My mods are 1.6 lifters, mild porting, larger valves, headers. Do I have a vacuum leak? my upper RPM and KPA values seem to be unaffected, but they don't run the vacuum I do at idle and I do not operate in the upper RPM/KPA area nearly as long as I do at idle.
Please any input is appreciated.
Ben
I have done 8 iterations of adjusting my VE tables based upon the rich condition and have gone from the stock VE of somewhere in the 40's to now the low 21's for the idle blocks (800 RPM/ 20-30 KPA).
My mods are 1.6 lifters, mild porting, larger valves, headers. Do I have a vacuum leak? my upper RPM and KPA values seem to be unaffected, but they don't run the vacuum I do at idle and I do not operate in the upper RPM/KPA area nearly as long as I do at idle.
Please any input is appreciated.
Ben
Originally posted by gb95zconv
The VE tables are only going to help you in open loop....they are not used in closed loop.
The VE tables are only going to help you in open loop....they are not used in closed loop.
How did I miss that little tidbit of info? I have used vemaster software and they do not mention that it is only for open loop.
Thanks for the info. So what should I adjust to keep from going rich?
Ben
Originally posted by gb95zconv
The VE tables are only going to help you in open loop....they are not used in closed loop.
The VE tables are only going to help you in open loop....they are not used in closed loop.
I always thought the VE table was used only in SD mode and it ran of the MAF tables all other times (open and closed loop)
Originally posted by Soma07
Are you sure?
I always thought the VE table was used only in SD mode and it ran of the MAF tables all other times (open and closed loop)
Are you sure?
I always thought the VE table was used only in SD mode and it ran of the MAF tables all other times (open and closed loop)
I think I read somewhere that if the SD mode (using VE Tables) was more accurate then in MAF mode then it would switch over. This could be a reason why some cars will see results tuning their VE Tables. Or am I smoking crack again?
Well, I did research into VE tables and found that they are used in closed loop operation. So is it a good idea to possibly change my MAF tables?
I could change the MAF to read less air (at lower RPM's only) coming in and thus it reads a lean condition which might offset my rich condition I cannot overcome by modifying the VE tables?
However in the end, if I have an underlying problem within my engine this is just a bandage. What problems can I have to cause this constant rich condition no matter what I do to change the VE tables?
Could it be a vacuum leak, fouled plugs (I will take them out here in the next few days) problem sensor (map, maf, o2's) or something else.
I could change the MAF to read less air (at lower RPM's only) coming in and thus it reads a lean condition which might offset my rich condition I cannot overcome by modifying the VE tables?
However in the end, if I have an underlying problem within my engine this is just a bandage. What problems can I have to cause this constant rich condition no matter what I do to change the VE tables?
Could it be a vacuum leak, fouled plugs (I will take them out here in the next few days) problem sensor (map, maf, o2's) or something else.
I wrote VEMaster and what Wilson said is correct AFAIK. The VE tables are only used in SD mode (MAF disabled). Try resetting your VE tables to stock and disabling the maf, then log some data and run VEMaster. I wouldn't run with the tables as they are now, because if you run VEMaster over and over again, it's going to keep lowering (in this case) your VE tables based upon blm's, but they're not changing because the MAF is being used for fueling.
Some people have seen changes when using VEMaster during normal (maf) operation. Others have not. I would say you fall into the latter category.
Ben, so where are your BLM's at cruise? I didn't see a cam listed. How about a TB? Are both sides 108 or just one? 108 means rich, a vacuum leak would cause high blm's, where the computer is adding fuel to correct what it sees as a lean condition. You still running the stock injectors at stock fuel pressure?
Joe
Some people have seen changes when using VEMaster during normal (maf) operation. Others have not. I would say you fall into the latter category.
Ben, so where are your BLM's at cruise? I didn't see a cam listed. How about a TB? Are both sides 108 or just one? 108 means rich, a vacuum leak would cause high blm's, where the computer is adding fuel to correct what it sees as a lean condition. You still running the stock injectors at stock fuel pressure?
Joe
Last edited by jgeorger; Oct 10, 2002 at 07:21 AM.
Just a thought, but why don't you try setting the injector size as 2 - 3 # larger than what you actually have in the car. That will cause the computer to adjust the pulse widths down to compensate and that may lean you out a bit.
All this assumes your O2 sensors, plug wires, and opti and ... and ... and all the electrical stuff is in good working order.
You may want to have the car scoped to check it out further.
Hope this helps
LWM
All this assumes your O2 sensors, plug wires, and opti and ... and ... and all the electrical stuff is in good working order.
You may want to have the car scoped to check it out further.
Hope this helps
LWM
Originally posted by LWM
Just a thought, but why don't you try setting the injector size as 2 - 3 # larger than what you actually have in the car. That will cause the computer to adjust the pulse widths down to compensate and that may lean you out a bit.
LWM
Just a thought, but why don't you try setting the injector size as 2 - 3 # larger than what you actually have in the car. That will cause the computer to adjust the pulse widths down to compensate and that may lean you out a bit.
LWM
Originally posted by jgeorger
I wrote VEMaster and what Wilson said is correct AFAIK. The VE tables are only used in SD mode (MAF disabled). Try resetting your VE tables to stock and disabling the maf, then log some data and run VEMaster. I wouldn't run with the tables as they are now, because if you run VEMaster over and over again, it's going to keep lowering (in this case) your VE tables based upon blm's, but they're not changing because the MAF is being used for fueling.
Some people have seen changes when using VEMaster during normal (maf) operation. Others have not. I would say you fall into the latter category.
Ben, so where are your BLM's at cruise? I didn't see a cam listed. How about a TB? Are both sides 108 or just one? 108 means rich, a vacuum leak would cause high blm's, where the computer is adding fuel to correct what it sees as a lean condition. You still running the stock injectors at stock fuel pressure?
Joe
I wrote VEMaster and what Wilson said is correct AFAIK. The VE tables are only used in SD mode (MAF disabled). Try resetting your VE tables to stock and disabling the maf, then log some data and run VEMaster. I wouldn't run with the tables as they are now, because if you run VEMaster over and over again, it's going to keep lowering (in this case) your VE tables based upon blm's, but they're not changing because the MAF is being used for fueling.
Some people have seen changes when using VEMaster during normal (maf) operation. Others have not. I would say you fall into the latter category.
Ben, so where are your BLM's at cruise? I didn't see a cam listed. How about a TB? Are both sides 108 or just one? 108 means rich, a vacuum leak would cause high blm's, where the computer is adding fuel to correct what it sees as a lean condition. You still running the stock injectors at stock fuel pressure?
Joe
My BLM's at cruise are now in the low 110's. at idle (or 0 TPS from high rpm) I am at 108 or close to it - both sides. Yes I am running stock fuel pressure with stock injectors. My cam and TB are also stock. I guess the only thing I did is took out my TB screen. I "thought" since I had a scoop that my air would be more laminar than a stock setup and therefore would not need it. I could be wrong.
Ben
Originally posted by Wilson
Well, you would only want to adjust the injector constant only if your BLM's are off throughout the entire rpm range. If your BLM's are only off at low rpm then you would start tweaking your injector pulsewidths. If your having problems with your BLM's at mid-upper rpms & load then your want to tweak your MAF tables.
Well, you would only want to adjust the injector constant only if your BLM's are off throughout the entire rpm range. If your BLM's are only off at low rpm then you would start tweaking your injector pulsewidths. If your having problems with your BLM's at mid-upper rpms & load then your want to tweak your MAF tables.
Please restate what you just said here. I think it is critical, but your message may have come across garbled.
Thanks bud.
Ben
Originally posted by 95Blackhawk
My BLM's at cruise are now in the low 110's. at idle (or 0 TPS from high rpm) I am at 108 or close to it - both sides. Yes I am running stock fuel pressure with stock injectors. My cam and TB are also stock. I guess the only thing I did is took out my TB screen. I "thought" since I had a scoop that my air would be more laminar than a stock setup and therefore would not need it. I could be wrong.
Ben
My BLM's at cruise are now in the low 110's. at idle (or 0 TPS from high rpm) I am at 108 or close to it - both sides. Yes I am running stock fuel pressure with stock injectors. My cam and TB are also stock. I guess the only thing I did is took out my TB screen. I "thought" since I had a scoop that my air would be more laminar than a stock setup and therefore would not need it. I could be wrong.
Ben
I don't understand it. Something must be wrong somewhere. Especially with a stock cam. How are your O2's looking? Are they swinging back and forth at idle/part throttle? I assume you descreened the maf, not the tb. I did that way back when before I knew better, but it hasn't adversely affected me.
What the other guys are saying is that you could raise the injector constant - that would in effect lean you out across the whole rpm range. And your blm's should rise. If they go back to 108, you know something mechanical is wrong. Make sure the intake tract is sealed between the maf and tb.
Joe
Hey all, thanks for the help!
OK tonight I am going to set my VE tables back to stock and see what happens. I guarantee you that the idle blocks at the very least will head towards 108 in a matter of minutes.
After that, I am gonna start playing with my MAF tables and see if I can lean it out only in the lower RPMs/AFGS range because that is where I am having problems.
I will post my results to you all.
BTW, is there a way of me getting you all access to a file I have? How can I do that through the internet? Can I attach a file here on this board or do they not allow it?
OK tonight I am going to set my VE tables back to stock and see what happens. I guarantee you that the idle blocks at the very least will head towards 108 in a matter of minutes.
After that, I am gonna start playing with my MAF tables and see if I can lean it out only in the lower RPMs/AFGS range because that is where I am having problems.
I will post my results to you all.
BTW, is there a way of me getting you all access to a file I have? How can I do that through the internet? Can I attach a file here on this board or do they not allow it?
You can email it to me at wilson@wilsonch.d2g.com
And if you want me to post it online just let me know and I'll put it on my webserver.
And if you want me to post it online just let me know and I'll put it on my webserver.


